India!
 

Why are sending money we don't have to India, when they're spending over $1T on infrastructure projects?

13 new steel plants.
10 thermal power plants.
3 nuclear power stations.
$75B of new roads.
$26B of new railways.
$266B in petrochemical.

Well done Dave. We're all it in together. :rolleyes:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1259909

The modernisation of IGIA and the addition of a FOURTH runway rankles with me. While the Govt has cancelled increased airport capacity in the south east in a nod to the greens, expansion of aviation across the world continues apace, far outweighing the carbon saved at home. We're getting left behind, led by donkeys beholden to their bankster mates. :mad:

It's all about politics, any question of right or wrong with people's money, or economic benefit, is out of the window.

Would be nice if we could sort ourselves out first

Well someone voted the tw4ts in. We cant even fix our pot holes. LMFAO

I'm just impressed that the effort of watching LiveAid re-runs every night has meant that the Indian government has been able to afford what it's peasant farmers need to live on ... http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110531/164329503.html ...

"... The two countries signed a contract stipulating the supply of 12 single-seat MiG-29Ks and four two-seat MiG-29KUBs to India in January 2004. The contract is part of a $1.5-billion deal to deliver the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier, currently being retrofitted in Russia for the Indian Navy. ...".

Oh look, an aircraft carrier! Funny, thought we had a spare one of those hanging about somewhere ... :wonder: Probably down the back of the sofa somewhere ....:idea:

Damn! Looks like those pesky Frogs have beaten the Indians to the crease. ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ay-French.html ... "... While France only has one carrier, it is possible that the second of two 60,000-ton British carriers being built could be shared by the two countries to be used only for training in a move that would save millions for both nations. ...". What dashed good idea. Save us all loadsa wonga! 'Course, it's all been thought up recently. No way was this the plan since the mid-90s to share equipment so EU countries would never be able to act alone again. No way. That wouldn't have been the plan at all .... :Suspiciou

Anyway, back to the Indians, or anyone getting aid from us. F"ck off and earn your own bleddy money to pi55 up the wall. We're having to borrow to give aid. I mean, WTFecketyFeck is Call Me Dave on! ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????

Dave

It appears that 'we' need to provide aid to the poor and needy because the Indian government chooses not too as it is too busy having a pi$$ing contest with Pakistan, etc to worry about the people it pretends it is protecting. It appears we need to pay aid (bribes) to ensure business comes our way - not including TATA who is busy making people redundant in the UK...

It is wrong to provide aid to a government who could do it themselves but chooses no to - such as India. However, if we do not then these vunerable people starve to death and/or die of illness - which imho is even worse.

The government and middle/upper classes need to pull their head out of the asses and start to take care of their own people first and foremost!

It is a country who have a apathetic attitude to death and real suffering be it men, women and children so hardly surprising things are they way they are.