DHL E-mail that's actually a virus attack ?
Just received one, luckily Chrome said "NO !".
Is this a new trick or am I behind the times ? dunx |
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
<customerservice.no.5358@dhl.com>: Remote host said: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected customerservice.no.5358@dhl.com [RCPT_TO] --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Received: from [217.146.183.216] by nm4.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2010 20:58:04 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.62] by tm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2010 20:58:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2010 20:58:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 265395.26502.bm@omp1031.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 58379 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Nov 2010 20:58:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1289422684; bh=eOWAs0VR+1zs05ViZUe+9CojWtSRSIwcg/nSkHJ7QLU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0XoV4TILd5pc0EkI1/A/B+4MMw5jE252r/+e3KIrQD0qfOjqHrW0yET1CFFJ6kPVUGBo1c/lXNSLHmVu60t250q/AtqbhBSWIRqw1rW4JY2V0C/1amg20z08W0It0nVNL0jOp1VxFwaYecVyFbPYoGOEfEjviw7Ho rJMjpj7s3k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5ZpwDp8/wQdR92AhqnSaTUeVxCxkjwgVfuztbHEa0od+eBlbxViSkRtyhY izdF/yP65BSWfc3dxxm0bnrXVdBTCZyBBpS3/DPaF91tfCAEX++vf4WG7auohHv2SjjSGyVX63vetM98/6r4UkfeJIEQEXLHnmlsIar1u8YaPljLM=; Message-ID: <57365.56526.qm@web27604.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: FsdEIKkVM1nRir9MEcKCszuHBs0jh8U8t9ydrb_yVJCfrJw 63aiAazNb2XLjuIDQbDuGau.ho7bg7QM8fr4y5eJDv2bCQHMwa yHFfvCOdmu kH8E4WOlkBG.NHxPA6I312gWRx2rfOQeOEiv5kUgJuDA0x.ya_ I93Sb3C.9i G6vljdji4rM3YvdsTPjVx5IGMy3pN1_KDPRPXK5etkb__.AE9k .x.yTlU0vl ZXTI4lZaF4WyH9LPCchVrwabaAxMi5h66mKfVwLaAJTdRqUuTP l2MTNYufEu iIuMTPpoBylDvWgDHpI9j6nKowrt9QGZzrvgCrhJoCh2gOw-- Received: from [90.200.31.203] by web27604.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:58:03 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 References: <000f01cb7fdd$79c7595e$3f0fa8c0@user-e0502298ea> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:58:03 +0000 (GMT) From: duncan campbell <campbed04@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: Re: DHL service. Get your parcel No171544 To: DHL Global Services <customerservice.no.5358@dhl.com> In-Reply-To: <000f01cb7fdd$79c7595e$3f0fa8c0@user-e0502298ea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-490731983-1289422683=:56526" --0-490731983-1289422683=:56526 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Virus attached !=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFr om: DHL Gl= obal Services <customerservice.no.5358@dhl.com>=0ATo:"ME" o.uk=0ASent: Tue, 9 November, 2010 6:12:31=0ASubject: DHL service. Get your= parcel No171544=0A=0A Dear Customer!=0A=0AYour package has been returned = to the DHL office.=0AThe reason of the return is - Incorrect delivery addre= ss of the package!=0A=0AAttached to the letter mailing label contains the d= etails of the package =0Adelivery.=0AYou have to print mailing label, and c= ome in the SDF office in order to receive =0Athe packages.=0A=0AThank you.= =0ADHL Logistics.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AIt is not quite accurate to say th= at in deduction we proceed from the more to =0Athe less general, still less= to say, as is often said, that we proceed from the =0Auniversal to the par= ticular.For it may happen that the consequent is of =0Aprecisely the same a= mount of generality as the antecedent. This is so, not only =0Ain most form= s of immediate inference, but also in a syllogism which consists of =0Asing= ular propositions only, e. =0A=0A=0A=0A --0-490731983-1289422683=:56526 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></he= ad><body><div style=3D"font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, se= rif;font-size:14pt"><div>Virus attached !</div><div style=3D"font-family:ti= mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt"><br><div style=3D"fon= t-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size= =3D"2" face=3D"Tahoma"><hr size=3D"1"><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;"= >From:</span></b> DHL Global Services <customerservice.no.5358@dhl.com&g= t;<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> "ME" hoo.co.uk<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tue, 9 = November, 2010 6:12:31<br><b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject:</s= pan></b> DHL service. Get your parcel No171544<br></font><br><meta http-equ= iv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-control" content=3D"off">=0A=0A =0A =0A<style></style>= =0A=0A=0ADear Customer!<br>=0A<br>=0AYour package has been returned to the = DHL office.<br>=0AThe reason of the return is - Incorrect delivery address = of the package!<br>=0A<br>=0AAttached to the letter mailing label contains = the details of the package delivery.<br>=0AYou have to print mailing label,= and come in the SDF office in order to receive the packages.<br>=0A<br>=0A= Thank you.<br>=0ADHL Logistics.<br>=0A<br>=0A<br>=0A<br>=0A<br>=0A<br>= 0A<b= r>=0A<p><font color=3D"#FFFFF6">It is not quite accurate to say that in ded= uction we proceed from the more to the less general, still less to say, as = is often said, that we proceed from the universal to the particular.For it = may happen that the consequent is of precisely the same amount of generalit= y as the antecedent. This is so, not only in most forms of immediate infere= nce, but also in a syllogism which consists of singular propositions only, = e. </font></p>=0A=0A=0A<meta http-equiv=3D"x-dns-prefetch-control" content= =3D"on"></div></div><div style=3D"position:fixed"></div>=0A=0A=0A</div><br>= =0A=0A=0A=0A </body></html> --0-490731983-1289422683=:56526-- |
I get the same emails from time to time, my anti virus has always picked them up plus my spam filter always picks them before they get to my inbox. :mad:
I think some of them have been known to contain spyware/walware, no doubt Nigerians are involved somewhere down the line. :Suspiciou |
yep also get them from fedex and ups as well
|
Nigerian scammers using same trick and still using only Yahoo...
|
just had one from UPS
|
Had one this morning from DHL
|
Yep i get them all the time saying Fedex was unable to deliver your item today blah blah blah, i dont click the link in these emails i just delete them.:Suspiciou
|
Phew ! I am expecting Snail Mail, but they seem to have lost my parcel...
Thanks fellas ! dunx |
I keep getting DHL ones. The attachment is an .exe file. I'm not dumb enough to run it and just dlete them as thy come in, I've had about 4 now.
|
just deleted a Fedex one.Norton anti-virus picked up on it.
|
You deserve a virus if you're dumb enough to open random emails with attachements (sp?) ...
TX. |
Fine but I'm expecting a parcel, that has gone missing...
Easy to get caught out in the rush. dunx |
Originally Posted by dunx
(Post 9710480)
Fine but I'm expecting a parcel, that has gone missing...
Easy to get caught out in the rush. dunx |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands