ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   ScoobyNet General (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/)
-   -   2 Litre 2.5 Litre Scooby Engines (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/721860-2-litre-2-5-litre-scooby-engines.html)

Alan MaC 30 October 2008 09:00 PM

2 Litre 2.5 Litre Scooby Engines
 
Jst wondering which is the best for mods & what you can acheive.

I have a 2 litre but notice the 2.5 litre seems to be able to handle bigger mods/bhp etc.

Wondered what the rest of you think and, any examples of power on 2/2.5 blocks.

Regards


Alan MaC

JohnD 30 October 2008 11:16 PM

I was lead to believe that the 2.5 in standard form, was not quite as strong as the 2ltr? (in STi form) Re-built with uprated componants, it would then be capable of big bhp with the extra half litre offering good torque gains.

JohnD

dunx 30 October 2008 11:21 PM

A std STI engine like mine have been run at up to 450 bhp.
The 2.5 engine isn't going to get to that figure, however the huge torque figures they produce make an awesome road car.

Mine 380/360 2.0 STI, Bez's 2.5 WRX 300/380 but at much lower revs. so he will be quicker !

HTH

DunxC

phil_wrx 31 October 2008 12:59 AM


Originally Posted by dunx (Post 8234961)
A std STI engine like mine have been run at up to 450 bhp.
The 2.5 engine isn't going to get to that figure, however the huge torque figures they produce make an awesome road car.

Mine 380/360 2.0 STI, Bez's 2.5 WRX 300/380 but at much lower revs. so he will be quicker !

HTH

DunxC

not if u give its some beans

T5NYW 31 October 2008 01:36 AM

Horses for Courses :rolleyes:

will depend on the Turbo, how it's MAPPed etc etc. WRX lighter/STi 6sp heavier ;) Lots have big "power" differences but not that much difference in 1/4 mile times or 2secs faster on this circuit 2 secs slower on that circuit etc etc. I'd prefer the 2.5ltr WRX 5sp on the road but the STi 6sp on the Track ;)

This is my personal preference and the "Stig" may get better results, I've tried most newage Scoob variation ;)

I have beaten cars with lest weight AND greater peak BHP than mine on twisties/handling etc. so numbers aren't everything ;)

Tony

bighead 31 October 2008 01:59 AM

2.35 is the best option for power and reliabilty

Shaun 31 October 2008 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by bighead (Post 8235245)
2.35 is the best option for power and reliabilty

Why is that then..... or is this one of these Subaru Tuning myths! ;)

Peanuts 31 October 2008 02:51 PM

Step away from the keyboard Shaun, or at least tell me what the block mod is by PM ;) :p

Shaun 31 October 2008 03:01 PM

roflol

bighead 31 October 2008 05:59 PM


Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 8236052)
Why is that then..... or is this one of these Subaru Tuning myths! ;)

yr at it again shaun:)

2.35 =closed deck, that will rev = power :)

Shaun 31 October 2008 06:10 PM

I appreciate the CDB thing, but at what power level has it been proven (not saying it has not) that a semi-open deck block gives up and a CDB will continue to keep on going?

My 2.5L will rev well beyond 8k. The rev limit has been set at 8200 since it was put in and is used. ;) So much for 2.5's not reving hey! :D It is as happy to rev to 8200rpm as the 2ltr engine that came out. :)

dynamix 31 October 2008 06:35 PM

but .... why rev the nuts off it when you have the power everywhere else ?

Got to be a 2.5 every time - there is no substitute for engine capacity. Oh and over 400 on a std 2.5 sti engine is as reliable as over 400 bhp on a std 2.0 sti from what I have seen.

oh and Peanuts .... I am 99% sure I know what the mod is ... but I'm not telling either :D

will_wrx 31 October 2008 06:38 PM

The 2.0 is a more reliable engine when tuning, thats fact.

:)

Shaun 31 October 2008 06:47 PM

In most cases, that is utter horse crap!

Shaun 31 October 2008 06:47 PM

Duncan,
I like to rev my nuts..... don't you! :D

dynamix 31 October 2008 06:52 PM


Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 8236555)
Duncan,
I like to rev my nuts..... don't you! :D

Shaun - no offense, but I really dont want to think about your nuts :eek:

Somebody please take the nasty man away :D

dunx 31 October 2008 08:36 PM

Come on, Subaru can't get 400 bhp out of one (2.5).... out the box !

DunxC

Shaun 31 October 2008 08:39 PM

When someone says "tuning" I assume that means the ability to alter internals if required, as I certainly have not said anything about standard. ;)

bighead 31 October 2008 08:56 PM


Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 8236480)
My 2.5L will rev well beyond 8k. The rev limit has been set at 8200 since it was put in and is used. ;) So much for 2.5's not reving hey! :D It is as happy to rev to 8200rpm as the 2ltr engine that came out. :)

yes but how much work/expence have yr heads had !!!!

Shaun 31 October 2008 09:03 PM

Still a 2.5 though init. ;) :D

You can't beat a bit of head. :D

John Stevenson 01 November 2008 12:26 AM


Originally Posted by will_wrx (Post 8236531)
The 2.0 is a more reliable engine when tuning, thats fact.

:)

What a lot of p!sh !!

martwrxsl 01 November 2008 01:37 AM


Originally Posted by John Stevenson (Post 8237428)
What a lot of p!sh !!

Why? Thicker cylinder liners etc.. explain..? 2.0 tuned to death like a vtec engine would be far stronger than a 2.5 less material. Do you not agree?:wonder:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands