Originally Posted by webby v7 slipperwagon (Post 8181058)

Another bashing the innocent copper thread.

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181092)

There's nothing quite like making yourself popular with people who could make life difficult for you! :thumb:

Originally Posted by webby v7 slipperwagon (Post 8181113)

You know what, they make there own lives difficult, i'm not into copper bashing because i really believe the post 90's coppers are ok. But these new breed of young clowns are hard to believe, it seems they just take any CLOWN on board to make up the numbers.

Originally Posted by dpb (Post 8181107)

is she disabled herself

Originally Posted by GC8 (Post 8181102)

Paul, that is shameful. Reassure her that she wont be prosecuted if she insists on a jury trial. If the police court is her only option then it will be dropped when she appeals to the higher court.

Simon

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181146)

I'm sure the car park should have some sort of CCTV covering the front of the store which would probably also cover the disabled parking spaces.

So has she been charged and released on bail pending further investigation? Or simply cautioned?

Originally Posted by webby v7 slipperwagon (Post 8181167)

Released on bail. But told not to worry WTF:mad:

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181092)

There's nothing quite like making yourself popular with people who could make life difficult for you! :thumb:

Originally Posted by Tam the bam (Post 8181238)

Cops are supposed to be here to to serve and protect us, not use their badge to get back at society for the bullying they received at school!

Originally Posted by webby v7 slipperwagon (Post 8181058)

Another bashing the innocent copper thread.Well iv'e tried to stand up for you cnuts, but tonight you out did yourself. My mom 67 yo, was arrested and bruised by you scummy lot because she had an argument at tesco car park about someone who was not disabled parking in a disabled parking bay. The two fat scumbags in the disabled parking bay called out to the security idiot who managed to get two on duty officers in tescos, to the scene. So what do they do nick my 67 yo mom, not the fat pricks who are in the wrong but my mom. She was manhandled, has CANCER and is now in a terrible state, as she has been charged with common assault. YOU LOT REALLY ARE A LOAD OF PRICKS

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181286)

I've not seen anything that states that the other people invloved did not have a disabled badge in their vehicle.

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181286)

I've not seen anything that states that the other people invloved did not have a disabled badge in their vehicle.

Originally Posted by zip106 (Post 8181295)

Like this bit?

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181315)

Here's one for you to all look at which will help with getting to the bottom of things.



Now answer these 5 questions as either
True (the conclusion from the situation is true from the facts known about it)

False (the conclusion is false given the situation described and the facts known about it)

Impossible to say (it is impossible to say if it is either true or false given the situation and the facts known about it)

1: The robber was a man.

2: Steven Tibbs may have been the robber.

3: The cashier reported the robbery to the police.

4: The robber could be a friend of the cashier.

5: Pete Mickson could have been the robber.

This should only take you 5 minutes to complete. I'll post the correct answers later.

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181321)

Maybe I should have been clearer. I've not seen anything, bar what the accused has claimed, that the other car did not have a disabled badge. Hence why I am not jumping to conclusions.

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't (Post 8181321)

Maybe I should have been clearer. I've not seen anything, bar what the accused has claimed, that the other car did not have a disabled badge. Hence why I am not jumping to conclusions.