ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Manchester City or Manchester United ? (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/638204-manchester-city-or-manchester-united.html)

Buckwheat 02 October 2007 06:57 AM


Originally Posted by The Rig (Post 7298355)

apart from the title last season,what have we really won this decade ???

not much glory is it

Three league titles (2000, 2001, 2003), an FA Cup(2004) and a League Cup (2006)? :lol1:

MattW 02 October 2007 09:03 AM

1.29 miles L1 Wrexham A F C Ltd LL11 2AH
23.52 miles L1 Tranmere Rovers F C CH42 9PY
23.56 miles CH Crewe Alexandra Football Club Co Ltd
24.77 miles L2 Shrewsbury Town Football Club
27.46 miles PR Liverpool Football Club Plc
28.08 miles PR Everton Football Club Co Ltd
33.48 miles L1 Port Vale Football Club Co Ltd
33.90 miles CH Stoke City Football Club
37.98 miles CH Wigan Athletic Football Club
38.90 miles L2 Macclesfield Town Football Club
41.65 miles PR Manchester United Football Club Plc


Well United were closer :razz:

PeteBrant 02 October 2007 09:15 AM


Originally Posted by Buckwheat (Post 7298610)
Three league titles (2000, 2001, 2003), an FA Cup(2004) and a League Cup (2006)? :lol1:

:lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

How on earth are they still getting support after that dismal haul?

Gav 02 October 2007 11:26 AM

I was brought up to be a red as all my family support united. All this drivel from city fans saying Manchester is blue are deluded, there are simply many many more united fans. If city had so many more fans then why dont they fill their own stadium? They filled it on derby day so why not all the other games? Part time supporters if you ask me:rolleyes:

davegtt 02 October 2007 11:42 AM

They filled it on Derby day cause there was loads of reds in the home ends. Happens all the time, as I expect 1000+ Leeds fans to be in the Oldham end tonight.

Manchester as a City is blue. Im not saying they have more fans etc but the city is blue. Salford is red ;)

angrynorth 02 October 2007 02:49 PM


Originally Posted by davegtt (Post 7299036)
Manchester as a City is blue. Im not saying they have more fans etc but the city is blue. Salford is red ;)

That is just bollocks, unless you can categorically prove it one way or another you are just speculating. You live out in Oldham so how on earth would you know anyway? Most of the time when I speak to people in Oldham half of them have never ventured past the bleeding Spindles. ;)

Gav 02 October 2007 02:52 PM

I'm from Manchester, not Salford and i'm a red:wonder:

davegtt 02 October 2007 03:20 PM

The clue is in the name Manchester City and Manchester United ;) :D

p.s. I live 70+ miles away from Oldham now so your Spindles theory has been blown out of the water ;)

Patt@firstime 02 October 2007 03:56 PM

United forever

Funkii Munkii 02 October 2007 04:18 PM

United

Gav 02 October 2007 04:36 PM

More like this Funkii Munkii

UNITED!!!!!


:notworthy

Funkii Munkii 02 October 2007 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by scoobygav555 (Post 7299677)
More like this Funkii Munkii

UNITED!!!!!


:notworthy

You know it :luxhello:

speedymonkey 02 October 2007 09:58 PM

:luvlove: City



http://smilies.newcastlebeats.com/smilies/piss2.gifUnited

http://smilies.newcastlebeats.com/smilies/phpgrin2.gif

speedymonkey 02 October 2007 10:01 PM


Originally Posted by scoobygav555 (Post 7299473)
I'm from Manchester, not Salford and i'm a red:wonder:

Theres bound to be a couple that slip through Gav ;) :lol1:

fatscoobfella1 02 October 2007 10:35 PM

Thought Manchester United was formed from Failsworth football club. in 18??.

And pretty sure Failsworth is a suburb of Manchester...

City now play in a stadium that was built over Bradford pit.But back in the 60-70's it was less of a hole.

davegtt 02 October 2007 11:56 PM


Originally Posted by fatscoobfella1 (Post 7300765)
Thought Manchester United was formed from Failsworth football club. in 18??.

And pretty sure Failsworth is a suburb of Manchester...

City now play in a stadium that was built over Bradford pit.But back in the 60-70's it was less of a hole.

Yes but that was Newton Heath, Manchester United is in Salford ;)

City now play in a stadium called The City of Manchester Stadium (funnily enough just down the road from Newton Heath closer to the city centre ;) ) owned by the council. Making that more of the cities club than United ;) :D

angrynorth 02 October 2007 11:57 PM

Well, I just got back from OT, I asked the people around me in Stretford end t2 where they were from, all but one (I asked 8 people) were from Manchester with only one coming from outside and he was only from Middleton. Don't think that makes much of a difference but I don't really care. After 27 years supporting United and living in Manchester, I know the truth. :)

PS

Originally Posted by fatscoobfella1 (Post 7300765)
Thought Manchester United was formed from Failsworth football club. in 18??.

And pretty sure Failsworth is a suburb of Manchester...

City now play in a stadium that was built over Bradford pit.But back in the 60-70's it was less of a hole.

United were formed in Newton Heath in 1878. Newton Heath is about 1/2 a mile from where I live now and ironically even less than that distance from the new Boo Camp. City were formed in 1887 just round the corner in Ardwick.

The Boo Camp was very nearly rolled into Tameside a couple of years ago as Openshaw and part of Clayton are now classed as Tameside, does that make them any less Mancunian? I think not. Despite that lots of ABU losers will say that because OT is in Trafford that makes them less Mancunian... despite the fact that Trafford is a borough of Manchester.

The whole Salford Reds thing just doesn't wash any more either, Salford is a city within Greater Manchester as listed officially by the post office and Trafford isn't even in Salford, it's in Manchester.

Anyone who wants to argue this fact needs to look at the London clubs. There are no football clubs within the City of London itself, there are only clubs in the London boroughs, but would anybody question whether Arsenal, Chelsea or Fulham were in London? Again, as far as I know, Anfield and Everton are boroughs of Liverpool in the same way as Trafford is Manchester, but does anyone question whether these clubs are bin dipping scouse clubs? :razz: :)

davegtt 03 October 2007 12:02 AM

Bite bite bite :luxhello: :D

angrynorth 03 October 2007 12:06 AM


Originally Posted by davegtt (Post 7301066)
Bite bite bite :luxhello: :D

You know it!! Although I have had a few drinks so it may be slightly unfair. Having been schooled in Oldham myself though Dave, I reckon I can meet you intellectually. :p

fatherpierre 03 October 2007 12:43 AM


Originally Posted by angrynorth (Post 7301053)
Anyone who wants to argue this fact needs to look at the London clubs. There are no football clubs within the City of London itself, there are only clubs in the London boroughs, but would anybody question whether Arsenal, Chelsea or Fulham were in London?

Hardly a fair comparison. City of London is merely a district where the financial area is, and tiny.

angrynorth 03 October 2007 01:03 AM


Originally Posted by fatherpierre (Post 7301121)
Hardly a fair comparison. City of London is merely a district where the financial area is, and tiny.

Well the City of Manchester is pretty much the same, Manchester is a large urban conurbation in the same way as London is, ie it comprises of a small city centre with lots of sattelite towns making up Greater Manchester. Pretty much the same as Greater London albeit on a much smaller scale.

pauld37 03 October 2007 06:34 AM


Originally Posted by angrynorth (Post 7301053)

Anyone who wants to argue this fact needs to look at the London clubs. There are no football clubs within the City of London itself, there are only clubs in the London boroughs, but would anybody question whether Arsenal, Chelsea or Fulham were in London? :razz: :)

Thats why they are named after the boroughs of London, and not called London United or City!

davegtt 03 October 2007 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by angrynorth (Post 7301083)
You know it!! Although I have had a few drinks so it may be slightly unfair. Having been schooled in Oldham myself though Dave, I reckon I can meet you intellectually. :p

You think? Did I tell you I spend a year in school in Grantham, where the likes of Sir Issac Newton came from. I may just edge it ;) lmao

51st state 03 October 2007 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by scoobygav555 (Post 7299473)
I'm from Manchester, not Salford and i'm a red:wonder:

has mr higham seen this thread :wonder: :wonder:

Funkii Munkii 03 October 2007 08:00 AM


Originally Posted by pauld37 (Post 7301172)
Thats why they are named after the boroughs of London, and not called London United or City!

What all one of them, Barnet :wonder: :lol1:

unless you're trying to include

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Hammersmith and Fulham

51st state 03 October 2007 08:04 AM

united will get more support because they are so big and successfull ,how many armchair supporters do united have, and everyone wants tobe following a team that wins everything
it the same in liverpool
everton are know as the most supported club but not the biggest, they reckon a true liverpool player is an everton supporter:wonder: :wonder:

i bet chelsea's support has doubled since the money was thrown at it and they've won a few things, plus always in the news

51st state 03 October 2007 08:15 AM

we could change there names :wonder:


manchester-newtonheath-nowintrafford-salfordreds-followedbyany/everyone-united

manchester-ardwick-mosside-nowsportcity-supportedbyfansnowwithhope-city



:lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

would this perhaps answer everyone arguement :lol1:

Funkii Munkii 03 October 2007 08:33 AM

It's a bull**** argument that someone brought up one day becasue they had no better retort in a City v Utd argument and it's stuck, it always makes me smile though :)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands