Help...
I want to buy a 17" monitor and I don't know which one to buy? If it helps, I'm running a Voodoo 3dfx card. I have seen quite a few on Dabs for about £150 but which one do I buy? Any idea's Cheers Tim |
If you can get a 19'', I did and am well happy with the Mitsubishi Diamond Plus 91. Shame they don't make decent cars http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/biggrin.gif
David |
Tim
I'ld have a look on |
Sorry for posting a "you don't want do to it like that....do it like this.." post but I have to be honest and say that a PC's usability/enjoyment is all to do with the monitor.
Its your eyes, invest in the best you can - put it this way, how long will a monitor last you ? And at least you can take it between PC's. I invested a lot of dough in a 22in iiyama pro model, possibly overkill for some, but I spend about 10 hours a day on a PC. However I can say its an eye-relaxing time. |
I go with Iiyama too - quality.
Definitely go for a 19" opposed to a 17" |
I've never used an Iiyama monitor that I didn't like. They are great monitors.
|
Personally can only just fit a 17" on the desk at home. Definately no way I could get something bigger than 20" in the study i.e. v samll bedroom http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/smile.gif )
I have an NEC Multisync FE700+ which I'm very happy with. It doesn't do 1280x1024 very well at all - it has go inter-laced but I knew I wouldn't want to run it at that. at 1024x768 Its just fine for my needs at Home. Regards |
Personally I use a Compaq P110 (21" Monitor) at home, but for work I managed to find a cheap branded 19" monitor.
I found my Iiyama monitor at |
Definitely go for a quality brand as you'll be using it a fair bit I dare say. I'd strongly sugest Mitsubishi, Iiyama or ViewSonic. Definitely avoid Formac. DiamondTron/ Trinitron monitors tend to be more expensive but last longer and can give a better picture quality. If it was me I'd go the Mitsubishi route every time although I have a ViewSonic 17" that I'm pretty happy with.
Try someone like |
Check out the PC magazine web site. They have 17 and 19 inch monitors lab tested. They are normally pretty much spot on. P. |
Cheers for the help guys. I am now trying to make my mind up but I think I will go with a iiyama 17". I only use it in the evenings for surfing and stuff so I can't justify a 19" or 21" http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/eek.gif
Tim |
I can also vouch for Iiyama, I've got a 17" that I paid about 300 quid for 3 years ago and its still superb. Bit gutted on what I paid for it when I look now but better picture than mine at work(Nokia) and way better than my brother's noname one. 3 year warranty too !!
Cheers Cammy |
PC Pro highly rate the new Samsung 700IFT monitor. It's not cheap for a 17" screen (~£220 + VAT) but was the winner in their recent lab tests.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>The SyncMaster demonstrates just how good flat-screen shadow-mask tubes have now become, with superb geometry and focus to match the best aperture-grille displays. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I've had a 17" Samsung at home for 3 or 4 years. I paid over £300 for it back then but it will still do 1280 x 1024 superbly. We use Samsungs at work as well. ChrisB. |
Well, I've just ordered a Iiyama 1402 17" for £151 from Action.com. 16" viewable display, 3 year on-site warranty and quite adequate for my needs. Thanks again for the advice.
Tim |
Now do you want the good news or the bad news:
Good - I arrive home to find my monitor has been delivered already (just over 24hrs) when I said 2-3 days delivery. Bad - The screen picture is awful. http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/mad.gif It looks like it has shadows and is not and I quote "Crisp, Clear display..." I went to the Iiyama web site and downloaded the driver it recommends and I can't get that to work either!!! Any Idea's apart from sending it back or testing the "on-site" warranty. Tim (having a bad day anyway!) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands