Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
(Post 12038947)
I think having actual evidence would be a good start not just taking some member of the publics word for it :rolleyes: Even the Government has come out and said what a balls up the police have made of this situation. Completely and utterly incompetent. We can only hope that this now serves as a major wake-up call for them both to start getting their sh!t together. |
Originally Posted by 1509joe
(Post 12038965)
sanctimonious ....
If you can't continue in a discussion without being evasive, abusive and misogynistic then I suggest you cease trying. |
Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
(Post 12038947)
I think having actual evidence would be a good start not just taking some member of the publics word for it :rolleyes: Even the Government has come out and said what a balls up the police have made of this situation. Completely and utterly incompetent. To look at it another way - member of the public comes forward and states that he believes that the suspect is responsible for x,y,& z reasons. Police say its not enough to prove anything for a charge and do not investigate. Suspect then carries on flying his drone and decides to try Heathrow, where a large jet is brought down killing lots of people. Police examine the drone in the wreckage and prove the link to the original suspect. Would there then be an outcry that the police should have acted on the information sooner? Or after the member of the public comes forward and states that he believes that the suspect is responsible for x,y,& z reasons - police knock on his door and the suspect states its not him as he was at work that day, 'just ask my boss'. Police don't arrest him and check out his story first. The person who he stated was his boss is spoken to and states that the suspect does not work for him and was sacked moths ago. Police obviously become suspicious with the suspect as his alibi appears false, so they go back to the house to find the suspect has vanished and stripped the house bare of anything incriminating. Again, would the police be accused of being incompetent? What do you think they should have done with the information given to them? Act on it or just ignore it? If you ignore it, then vital evidence from a house search and their accounts in interview may never be discovered - which will prove them either guiltily or innocent. |
Originally Posted by markjmd
(Post 12038974)
It's very convenient for the Government to say that though,
|
Originally Posted by Felix.
(Post 12038979)
lol - doesn't take much your intellect - since you raise a discussion point, then refuse to answer and questions on it.
If you can't continue in a discussion without being evasive, abusive and misogynistic then I suggest you cease trying. |
Just when you make the comment of...
Originally Posted by 1509joe
(Post 12038889)
As for missing from homes, sudden deaths, transports to hospitals, etc etc. I've done all that out of the goodness of my heart never mind getting paid to do it.
|
Originally Posted by 1509joe
(Post 12038983)
I wish my Christmas present was a day in the interview room with you cause you'd be crying to be let out.
I wish the same my friend. I have had a few people like you in interviews, it ends up with the solicitor looking at his client and shaking his head in dismay. The soliciotr then advises his client to go guilty at court - lol |
|
Originally Posted by Wurzel
(Post 12039273)
|
Originally Posted by Wurzel
(Post 12039273)
|
Here we go again..... I can't get the "Catch the pigeon " music out of my head......
|
Originally Posted by lozgti1
(Post 12040307)
Here we go again..... I can't get the "Catch the pigeon " music out of my head......
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands