Sorry to ask - 2.5 WRX as prone to blowing up ?
Is the WRX Type UK 2.5 as prone to engine failure as the STI ? I apologise for asking as its been asked a million times but i hate the search on here.
I'm looking at an 06 with 74k miles and has had the head gasket replaced/upgraded within last 2 years at a known specialist. Is that their only weakness or is ringlands still a worry ? It wont be ragged or modified so not worried in that respect. Doesnt seem modified other than a cheap Dump Valve and an exhaust. I've only had a quick test drive so haven't looked over the paperwork but guy seems genuine and i know the specialist that did the work. |
In simple yes , it’s worth reading up on the numerous posts as it will be of help to you |
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...90109f92df.png Welcome but how the hell did you miss the sticky above? seriously, always look at the stickyies as they are there to help you 🙄 and incase you can’t find it: https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-failures.html |
Originally Posted by CharlySkunkWeed
(Post 12026281)
Is the WRX Type UK 2.5 as prone to engine failure as the STI ? I apologise for asking as its been asked a million times but i hate the search on here.
I'm looking at an 06 with 74k miles
Originally Posted by RobsyUK
(Post 12026304)
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...90109f92df.png Welcome but how the hell did you miss the sticky above? seriously, always look at the stickyies as they are there to help you 🙄 and incase you can’t find it: https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-failures.html |
Originally Posted by Ste333
(Post 12026319)
Well considering that sticky says 08-10 models, and he's looking at a 2006 car. I think he can be forgiven.
theres a whole lot of reading in those threads too. Was just hoping for a quick answer relating to my details rather than looking through the 100s of posts with all the variables. |
Originally Posted by CharlySkunkWeed
(Post 12026333)
and i own one of the cars in the sticky :cry:
theres a whole lot of reading in those threads too. Was just hoping for a quick answer relating to my details rather than looking through the 100s of posts with all the variables. |
Now don’t I look silly.. be worth flicking through that thread though, I don’t have a 2.5 and read things like flooring it in 4th at low revs can blow the head. True or not it’s an interesting theory |
Originally Posted by The Trooper 1815
(Post 12026335)
It appears the WRX 2.5 is not near the limits of the engine. They seem to go well, not break and make for a good machine. BUT do not push it or it will expire seems to be the thing to do.
Models are also known to suffer from piston ringland failure if remapped - as mentioned all of this is covered in the various stickies on the forum. The simple solution is to buy one that's been forged by a reputable engine builder, or potentially buy a JDM if you're set on a later shape :) |
Originally Posted by CharlySkunkWeed
(Post 12026281)
Is the WRX Type UK 2.5 as prone to engine failure as the STI ? I apologise for asking as its been asked a million times but i hate the search on here.
I'm looking at an 06 with 74k miles and has had the head gasket replaced/upgraded within last 2 years at a known specialist. Is that their only weakness or is ringlands still a worry ? It wont be ragged or modified so not worried in that respect. Doesnt seem modified other than a cheap Dump Valve and an exhaust. I've only had a quick test drive so haven't looked over the paperwork but guy seems genuine and i know the specialist that did the work. When I was in the process of looking for my Hawkeye I was always conscious of the horror stories surrounding the 2.5 engine so I researched the issue until it killed me, and from what I recall for the Hawkeye it was mainly the STI which suffered ringland failure and this was because they used slightly different pistons to the WRX . Also I found a post which suggested the headgasket was redesigned to be a little stronger on the 07 Hawkeye. Furthermore, the car was to be my daily runner so I chose the WRX for comfort, but also with these factors in mind. That said, I have remained cautious and refrained from any remapping for increased performance, knowing that there is a potential risk of blowing the headgasket Just my personal experience, I'm sure others will differ. |
Yeah as i said , I'm well aware of the usual 2.5 stuff but when this WRX stays unmodified, has had uprated head gasket, and doesn't get raked about am i doing all i can to be safe ? As in there's not the same poor odds of tuned STI ringlands failing.
|
Originally Posted by CharlySkunkWeed
(Post 12026373)
Yeah as i said , I'm well aware of the usual 2.5 stuff but when this WRX stays unmodified, has had uprated head gasket, and doesn't get raked about am i doing all i can to be safe ? As in there's not the same poor odds of tuned STI ringlands failing.
|
A basic remapped 2.0 WRX (TD04) will have more torque throughout the rev range than a stock 2.5 WRX though presumably?
|
Originally Posted by MrNoisy
(Post 12026356)
The 2.5's make good torque but the headgaskets are notorious for going on the blocks be it STI or WRX.
Models are also known to suffer from piston ringland failure if remapped - as mentioned all of this is covered in the various stickies on the forum. The simple solution is to buy one that's been forged by a reputable engine builder, or potentially buy a JDM if you're set on a later shape :) http://store.forcedperformance.net/m.../02-103-07.pdf |
I'm not bothered about better torque, driveability, etc. Its for someone who has wanted an impreza/evo all their lives and is coming from your usual 1.4/1.6 hatchbacks. As long as it makes the right noise, performs as a standard wrx should and doesn't explode, they'll be happy. Insurance and budget mean the youngest least modified available WRX is what they're after.
i really only wondered if it was "just" the head gasket that was a weakness, and with that sorted would that be at least something to help. |
Tempted to push my 2.5 beyond 500bhp. Won’t be worried one bit ;) |
Originally Posted by Brun
(Post 12026541)
Tempted to push my 2.5 beyond 500bhp. Won’t be worried one bit ;) Do it . You won't regret it |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands