Originally Posted by 1509joe
(Post 12022001)
Enough said :D
|
Not very nice that so what you basically mean to say is you employ cheap labour from people who are unfortunate enough to have a stable country. Then they invade other peoples and expect to live as if they were at home instead of blending in. As was said at the beginning of the thread when in Rome do as the Romans do. In my way of thinking that would be the done thing. Just like staying in somebody's house or a hotel you abide by the rules and don't rub other people up the wrong way.
|
Originally Posted by 1509joe
(Post 12022006)
Not very nice that so what you basically mean to say is you employ cheap labour from people who are unfortunate enough to have a stable country. Then they invade other peoples and expect to live as if they were at home instead of blending in. As was said at the beginning of the thread when in Rome do as the Romans do. In my way of thinking that would be the done thing. Just like staying in somebody's house or a hotel you abide by the rules and don't rub other people up the wrong way.
|
:thumb:
|
I don't like Boris and have no interest in reading his article.
The following is what a muslim friend told me The Burkha has no place in UK society and should be banned. Anybody wearing one is rejecting integration into UK society and therefore will NEVER play a useful role in this country. All they will do is produce lots of children who will be equally backward, fail to integrate and very likely be economically unproductive. This is a Wahabi (Saudi) influenced trend, a society known to subjugate its women. Liberals who defend a woman's 'choice' to wear a Burka are intellectually challenged. How can it be a choice if the wearing of a Burka is encouraged by a society and religion dominated by men? How many female Imams and 'islamic scholars' are there in places like Saudi? This is lost on liberals who perversely defend illiberal practices in the name of being liberal, go figure. If you want to wear a Burka fook off to Saudi and don't come back. |
Originally Posted by Dingdongler
(Post 12022031)
I don't like Boris and have no interest in reading his article.
The following is what a muslim friend told me The Burkha has no place in UK society and should be banned. Anybody wearing one is rejecting integration into UK society and therefore will NEVER play a useful role in this country. All they will do is produce lots of children who will be equally backward, fail to integrate and very likely be economically unproductive. This is a Wahabi (Saudi) influenced trend, a society known to subjugate its women. Liberals who defend a woman's 'choice' to wear a Burka are intellectually challenged. How can it be a choice if the wearing of a Burka is encouraged by a society and religion dominated by men? How many female Imams and 'islamic scholars' are there in places like Saudi? This is lost on liberals who perversely defend illiberal practices in the name of being liberal, go figure. If you want to wear a Burka fook off to Saudi and don't come back. |
Originally Posted by Dingdongler
(Post 12022031)
I don't like Boris and have no interest in reading his article.
The following is what a muslim friend told me The Burkha has no place in UK society and should be banned. Anybody wearing one is rejecting integration into UK society and therefore will NEVER play a useful role in this country. All they will do is produce lots of children who will be equally backward, fail to integrate and very likely be economically unproductive. This is a Wahabi (Saudi) influenced trend, a society known to subjugate its women. Liberals who defend a woman's 'choice' to wear a Burka are intellectually challenged. How can it be a choice if the wearing of a Burka is encouraged by a society and religion dominated by men? How many female Imams and 'islamic scholars' are there in places like Saudi? This is lost on liberals who perversely defend illiberal practices in the name of being liberal, go figure. If you want to wear a Burka fook off to Saudi and don't come back. This whole argument is a very slippery slope. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12021870)
interesting, you don't believe that women should be free to choose what they wear, yet presumably you think you should be free to insult whoever you want, in any way you want?
i see you are still peddling your liberal fairy story. |
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...3b13f10aa.jpeg Everyone happy now |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12022077)
Yes that well known liberal Boris Johnson.
This whole argument is a very slippery slope. It's not a slippery slope, its subjugation and has no place in progressive society; we should be engaging and educating those that don't recognise that fact and help them move into the 21st century. |
Good luck with that.
As I already mentioned, tell me how it worked in 1939? |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12022598)
Good luck with that.
As I already mentioned, tell me how it worked in 1939? |
All the good will in the World won't make a jot of difference there is no educating them they are doing it for their religious beliefs despite the fact the Quran does not require women to cover themselves up head to toe. As already pointed out this is a Saudi influence and if they are that hardline then they would be better off practising their form of religion in Saudi :rolleyes:
|
It must just be a coincidence that lots women wear the full garb in the hottest parts of the world ;)
|
Originally Posted by dpb
(Post 12022646)
It must just be a coincidence that lots women wear the full garb in the hottest parts of the world ;)
If so why don't the men wear the same gear? |
Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
(Post 12022642)
All the good will in the World won't make a jot of difference there is no educating them they are doing it for their religious beliefs despite the fact the Quran does not require women to cover themselves up head to toe. As already pointed out this is a Saudi influence and if they are that hardline then they would be better off practising their form of religion in Saudi :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by trails
(Post 12022678)
It's subjugation dressed up as religious compliance...so we should still aspire to helping them.
|
Originally Posted by trails
(Post 12022678)
It's subjugation dressed up as religious compliance...so we should still aspire to helping them.
I ban would be wholly wrong though |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands