Was mathematics discovered or invented?
Discuss. :wonder:
|
Surely discovered, interested to hear the opinions of others :D
|
Nothing much happened until the discovery of zero.
|
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 11949553)
Nothing much happened until the discovery of zero.
|
Originally Posted by Rob Day
(Post 11949548)
Surely discovered, interested to hear the opinions of others :D
|
Of course it was discovered.
You can't invent something that already exists, just waiting for someone to discover it. |
Bit of both clearly
HTH |
Discovered, nature is full of mathematical structures.
|
Originally Posted by scunnered
(Post 11949563)
Of course it was discovered.
You can't invent something that already exists, just waiting for someone to discover it. |
Originally Posted by wrx300scooby
(Post 11949580)
Discovered, nature is full of mathematical structures.
|
Does it matter?
Anyhow I thought Casio first discovered it......... dl |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11949584)
Phi.
|
Originally Posted by wrx300scooby
(Post 11949596)
:wonder:
|
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11949598)
Φ :thumb:
|
1.618 to 1. the divine number.
|
Originally Posted by scunnered
(Post 11949563)
Of course it was discovered.
You can't invent something that already exists, just waiting for someone to discover it.
Originally Posted by wrx300scooby
(Post 11949580)
Discovered, nature is full of mathematical structures.
|
Originally Posted by neil-h
(Post 11949608)
Nature only became full of mathematical structures when man kind invented the concept of maths. Previous to that point they were all just arrangenembts of matter. Unless of course you believe in a god and that he chose to construct things using that ratio because he deemed it to be asthetically pleasing...
|
Originally Posted by wrx300scooby
(Post 11949611)
The structures were there, man realised that there were patterns/shapes that fitted together and so began the journey.
|
Originally Posted by neil-h
(Post 11949615)
Yeah but they weren't expressed in mathematical forms until mankind invented mathematics as way to quantify them.
In the same way that the scientific principle had to be invented before scientific discoveries could be made. |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11949581)
How could mathematics simply exist?
:wonder: |
Originally Posted by TECHNOPUG
(Post 11949628)
This. Numbers (including zero), addition, subtraction, multiplication etc (and a way of recording them) had to be invented before all the mathematical equations and laws in nature could be discovered.
In the same way that the scientific principle had to be invented before scientific discoveries could be made. TBH I am surprised it is even a question..... :wonder: |
Originally Posted by TECHNOPUG
(Post 11949628)
This. Numbers (including zero), addition, subtraction, multiplication etc (and a way of recording them) had to be invented before all the mathematical equations and laws in nature could be discovered.
In the same way that the scientific principle had to be invented before scientific discoveries could be made. Adding up was not invented though (anymore than gravity was invented) |
Originally Posted by neil-h
(Post 11949615)
Yeah but they weren't expressed in mathematical forms until mankind invented mathematics as way to quantify them.
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11949636)
Adding up was not invented though (anymore than gravity was invented)
Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication & Division are all methods constructed by humans for describing patterns we discover in the universe. There maybe beings in another galaxy that have constructed different methods for describing the same patterns as us. So whilst the patterns and nature are the same throughout the universe, it requires a sentient mind to invent methods to describe them. |
Originally Posted by TECHNOPUG
(Post 11949642)
Gravity was neither invented or discovered, it's merely the name given to a mathematical description of the movements of celestial bodies, the tides, the precession of the equinoxes, and other phenomena.
Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication & Division are all methods constructed by humans for describing patterns we discover in the universe. There maybe beings in another galaxy that have constructed different methods for describing the same patterns as us. So whilst the patterns and nature are the same throughout the universe, it requires a sentient mind to invent methods to describe them. So cells didn't divide until we invented division? I'm sorry but I think we're probably not going to agree here :) |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11949648)
So cells didn't divide until we invented division?
I'm sorry but I think we're probably not going to agree here :) |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11949648)
So cells didn't divide until we invented division?
I'm sorry but I think we're probably not going to agree here :) |
Originally Posted by scoobypaul_temp
(Post 11949662)
Of course they divided - but until we recognised/understood that process, and then labelled it, what was it?
Yes, but there's a difference between understanding something and inventing it Rocks existed before we called them rocks - we didn't invent them :) |
Cells didn’t “divide” until we had invented the concept of division. Sure they did something; first there was 1 cell, now there are 2. So is that “addition”? No, it’s something else.
Division needed to be invented as a concept before we could describe what the cells were doing. It’s not the action of division but the mathematical concept of division that was invented. Without it, we wouldn’t be able to describe what we observed. Without inventing the scientific principle for example, we wouldn’t be able to describe the world around us. It would still exist but we’d be describing it as “Gods” or “Magic” – both invented human constructs. The basic mathematical constructs of numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication & division had to be invented to observe & describe our world, before discoveries using those principles could be made. Had we invented different forms of observations & descriptions, then our discoveries would be different, even if the patterns in nature remained the same. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11949663)
Yes, but there's a difference between understanding something and inventing it
Rocks existed before we called them rocks - we didn't invent them :) |
Originally Posted by TECHNOPUG
(Post 11949665)
Cells didn’t “divide” until we had invented the concept of division. Sure they did something; first there was 1 cell, now there are 2. So is that “addition”? No, it’s something else.
Division needed to be invented as a concept before we could describe what the cells were doing. It’s not the action of division but the mathematical concept of division that was invented. Without it, we wouldn’t be able to describe what we observed. Without inventing the scientific principle for example, we wouldn’t be able to describe the world around us. It would still exist but we’d be describing it as “Gods” or “Magic” – both invented human constructs. The basic mathematical constructs of numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication & division had to be invented to observe & describe our world, before discoveries using those principles could be made. Had we invented different forms of observations & descriptions, then our discoveries would be different, even if the patterns in nature remained the same. We invented the name for them - yes I agree, but that's it. Did we invent Physics and Chemistry too? Maybe colours and the weather? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands