Pointless asking, the Lord is all knowing and therefore already knows exactly what you are going to ask and will already have prepared a cryptic answer just to confound you.....the smug git!
|
Originally Posted by jonc
(Post 11909242)
Pointless asking, the Lord is all knowing and therefore already knows exactly what you are going to ask and will already have prepared a cryptic answer just to confound you.....the smug git!
|
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11909244)
Matthew 13:13
Great! He caused further confusion for the already confused by talking in riddles. If they didn't understand straight talk how were they supposed to unravel parables? Why would they even bother? |
Originally Posted by Paben
(Post 11909245)
Great! He caused further confusion for the already confused by talking in riddles. If they didn't understand straight talk how were they supposed to unravel parables? Why would they even bother?
|
my question to him would be if your father is so wonderfull cancer in children,what sort of god does that"
|
I would ask him to stop people on this site posting anything about religion.
Yet another boring diatribe from the self satisfied, smug, entrenched position,small-minded fundamentalists who revel in being holier-than-though. Whatever you think about JC,I bet he had a more sophisticated sense of humour than any of them. |
I'd ask him, if he'd had the chance, whether he would have voted to leave the EU?
|
Is this Jesus the only white guy in the Middle East or do you mean they guy from Brazil that was in fast and furious :D
|
Originally Posted by legb4rsk
(Post 11909358)
I would ask him to stop people on this site posting anything about religion.
Yet another boring diatribe from the self satisfied, smug, entrenched position,small-minded fundamentalists who revel in being holier-than-though. Whatever you think about JC,I bet he had a more sophisticated sense of humour than any of them. |
# Oh Jesus he knows me... #
|
|
Originally Posted by markjmd
(Post 11909377)
Take a close look at the opening post in this thread, and ask yourself the question. Do you honestly think that was posted by a fervent religious believer?
|
Originally Posted by legb4rsk
(Post 11909400)
It's not directed at him.You must know who it is?
|
Originally Posted by The Pink Ninja
(Post 11909376)
Is this Jesus the only white guy in the Middle East or do you mean they guy from Brazil that was in fast and furious :D
|
Originally Posted by ditchmyster
(Post 11909485)
Shussssssssssssh, don't go telling people Jesus was a black man, it's the best kept secret in history. ;)
|
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11909513)
He was a Palestinian Jew.
Probably fabrication. |
Originally Posted by JGlanzaV
(Post 11909517)
Conjecture at best.
Probably fabrication. |
Originally Posted by David Lock
(Post 11909129)
And would you still have told Billy Holiday the same joke back in the day when they were crucifying niggers and leaving them hanging as strange fruit? Or have the same giggle when IS crucify kids in Syria? The Jesus "joke" insults about half the world's population so what about a bit of respect to your fellow creatures.
David :nono: Kinda sums up the mental state of believers this doesn't it.. take a joke and become offended for the sake of it. JTaylor are you offended? :Suspiciou |
Originally Posted by ditchmyster
(Post 11909522)
No it's true, they found his robe and sandles in India. :thumb:
|
Originally Posted by pimmo2000
(Post 11909526)
Yet you just used one of the most offence words to try and make your point .. you didn't even try to quote it ..
:nono: Kinda sums up the mental state of believers this doesn't it.. take a joke and become offended for the sake of it. JTaylor are you offended? :Suspiciou Luke 23:34 reminds me of how Jesus reacted to His torturers and killers and mockers. I'm to emulate Him. |
Jesus didn't exist!.
|
Originally Posted by Matty81
(Post 11909537)
Jesus didn't exist!.
You can't prove Jesus didn't exist but then it can't be proved that he did exist either. |
after all that's been written about the Christian wars all those yrs ago. If Jesus did actually exist, surely their would of been something written down to prove it.
|
Originally Posted by Paben
(Post 11909541)
You can't prove Jesus didn't exist but then it can't be proved that he did exist either.
|
I don’t want to get to pedantic (he says before being pedantic)
But the concept of “proof” in these types of discussions is often misunderstood So you can’t “prove” he did or didn’t exist in the same way you can’t prove evolution does or doesn’t exist or even the earth is older than 5000 years old What you can say is “based a consilience of multiple lines of evidence “so and so” is more than likely true" And on that definition I think the evidence suggest an historical person called Jesus did exist and so did at least some events as portrayed in the bible – The King Herod census etc and if you take an opposing view - you have to demonstrate why the evidence is flawed and also (in the realms of science) put forward an opposing position that explains ALL the evidence |
I can see your point in that sense. If he did exist he was probably just a prophet or someone that people looked up to. But I can't believe that he had healing powers or the power to heal by just touching someone.
|
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11909550)
I don’t want to get to pedantic (he says before being pedantic)
But the concept of “proof” in these types of discussions is often misunderstood So you can’t “prove” he did or didn’t exist in the same way you can’t prove evolution does or doesn’t exist or even the earth is older than 5000 years old What you can say is “based a consilience of multiple lines of evidence “so and so” is more than likely true" And on that definition I think the evidence suggest an historical person called Jesus did exist and so did at least some events as portrayed in the bible – The King Herod census etc and if you take an opposing view - you have to demonstrate why the evidence is flawed and also (in the realms of science) put forward an opposing position that explains ALL the evidence You're confusing science with oral traditions and texts that have been many times rewritten and re-interpreted. A good question might be: If they existed why didn't Jesus, or for that matter Buddha and Mohammed, write down a single word themselves? Perhaps they couldn't read or write, instead relying on the debatable memories of acolytes, with their personal biases and interpretations. Not good preparation if God had a hand in their words. |
Originally Posted by Paben
(Post 11909556)
You're confusing science with oral traditions and texts that have been many times rewritten and re-interpreted. A good question might be: If they existed why didn't Jesus, or for that matter Buddha and Mohammed, write down a single word themselves? Perhaps they couldn't read or write, instead relying on the debatable memories of acolytes, with their personal biases and interpretations. Not good preparation if God had a hand in their words.
my reply was about the concept of proof - using science was just an example there seems to be documentary evidence for an historical figure called jesus proof - NO evidence - YES |
The concept of religious "proof".....
http://www.azquotes.com/public/pictu...oss-623582.jpg |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11909550)
I don’t want to get to pedantic (he says before being pedantic)
But the concept of “proof” in these types of discussions is often misunderstood So you can’t “prove” he did or didn’t exist in the same way you can’t prove evolution does or doesn’t exist or even the earth is older than 5000 years old What you can say is “based a consilience of multiple lines of evidence “so and so” is more than likely true" And on that definition I think the evidence suggest an historical person called Jesus did exist and so did at least some events as portrayed in the bible – The King Herod census etc and if you take an opposing view - you have to demonstrate why the evidence is flawed and also (in the realms of science) put forward an opposing position that explains ALL the evidence
Originally Posted by jonc
(Post 11909577)
The concept of religious "proof".....
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands