Should we take on more assylum seekers
 

We are after all doing better than Germany now , apparently ?!

NO!! we have enough car washes, thanks

:lol1:

No more

We are full
Can't even house what we have allready never mind even more

Should be the Australian system with points and entry for profffesional workers only

Anyone else got them in the Asda/ Sainsburys car parks?
"Car wash please sir?"

Are we fuller than Sweden for example?

We all ready do for immigrants migrants


But the post was about asylum seekers!

No, we should however be doing more to make sure they don't need to seek asylum in the first place as it will be cheaper in the long run, even if that involves a military presence in their home country.

As above we're struggling to cater for those already in the UK without adding further to the problem.

Nope, enough's enough. We can't keep taking in......

No

Yes, we should be prepared to take any from Libya as we are the reason they are seeking asylum. When I say we I don't mean me as I didn't vote for the fame seeking warmongering c**t in No. 10. Maybe they should all go and live with him and the saps who voted for him! :thumb:

some interesting figures
 

To say no is Racist. That's what we've been told for the last 10-15 years.

Cameron has a chance to prove he can stand up to Brussels, and say No!

Bollocks to the lefties and their "Heal the world" thinking. And while we're saying no, send some of them back who's already got in.

By your rule of thumb, not only should the big bad British take Libyan Asylum seekers, so should the other countries enforcing UNSC Resolution 1973 -

Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Denmark
France
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Romania
Spain
Turkey
USA

But yet again, lets not the facts get in the way of one of your ****ty posts :thumb:

Nope, just Britain. Cameron's fault. No one else's.

PS How's the primary school maths working for you? :lol1::lol1:

No but they are in the multi story car parks. A fiver to wash your car with the same bucket of water they have done the previos 10 cars with.

Ahhhh resulting to your usual insults because you've been shown to be a dickhead :thumb:

Nothing wrong with my Maths. Just your lack of intelligence ;)

Being called for a lack of intelligence by you is the ultimate in irony! :lol1:

are they met to seek asylum at the first country they come to out of there own?, if so, why travel all over the place to come here? shouldn't this be the real question, that needs to be fixed, so they don't go around half the world?

I think the Italians are a bit cheesed off with that one

Aye, lets have 'em all.

they can join the Romanians selling nicked scrap and begging on the streets...there's loads here doing just that.

Yes! Let's have some more!

http://www.barking-moonbat.com/image...MMIGRATION.jpg

Or maybe follow France's example? :wonder:

Anyone reading this thread would assume that we already take in more than our share of asylum seekers...we don't, FACT

that's absurd

Have you actually come down from your ivory tower in the last few years and had a look around the world that the rest of us live in?

Nope, just using facts

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statist...9_YB15_III.png

The UK takes on the 6th most amount of Asylum seekers out of 28 EU Member states. What exactly do you think is 'our fair share'? Let's take Portugal for instance, they took in a grand total of 440, same goes for Croatia.

thats correct

and we are the 2nd largest economy

Germany took appox 8x the asylum seeker we did