|
Excellent times and technique from a relatively low powered car. Interested to know what it weighs now its been on an extreme diet.
|
Any results from Scoobyfest? I would be interested in times.
FTD etc. I know there was an Evo into the 9's but considering it was the Biggest subaru event on the calendar there's not much I can find regarding Subarus. |
Originally Posted by dazdavies
(Post 11951181)
but considering it was the Biggest subaru event on the calendar there's not much I can find regarding Subarus.
|
Yeah Can't help but agree with that.
What annoyed me last time I went was not only did I have to pay to run my car at £40 but I also had to pay the £15 spectator charge on top of that. One or the other fine, but f*cking both? F*ck right off!!! |
My 2016 WRX STi:
12.4s @ 110mph Exhaust and intake mods. Full weight etc. |
Originally Posted by ScoobyDoo69
(Post 11951966)
My 2016 WRX STi:
12.4s @ 110mph https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV-jxvZ7kpU Exhaust and intake mods. Full weight etc. |
Please update list.
9.951@ 140.05mph Martynj |
Another update
9.83@139mph Martynj |
I'd rather do a 10.01 than a 9.99.
It's that film! Gutted for ya mate... |
Originally Posted by RS_Matt
(Post 11959576)
I'd rather do a 10.01 than a 9.99.
It's that film! Gutted for ya mate... |
My latest effort, 8.89
|
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...4cfe056235.jpg
My times from the weekend, Quite happy with the 120mph too, as well as that 0.01 RT Next target is get that 60ft back down to 1.7 and run an 11 :) |
Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
(Post 12028202)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...4cfe056235.jpg
My times from the weekend, Quite happy with the 120mph too, as well as that 0.01 RT Next target is get that 60ft back down to 1.7 and run an 11 :) |
Originally Posted by scoobiepaul
(Post 12028226)
Was that at Santa pod? We were going to go Sunday but weather was crap. Good times what is Car/spec.
Still on stock internals, newage sti, stock ecu, full weight, rainsport tyres SC42 that got remachined at owen developments, with some ethanol, |
Sc42 running around 420-450 with misfire, I reckoned high 10s or low 11s would of been doable on day if car went smooth. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...4266adb3c2.png |
Two years and counting time to get a move on busta you be as bad as me at this rate |
Originally Posted by RAGGY DOO
(Post 12028317)
Two years and counting time to get a move on busta you be as bad as me at this rate im more or less ready now to start building it together (just turbo to save for) just waiting on my mate till he has a spare weekend to make a start so hopefully next month at some point.... |
Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
(Post 12028272)
Sc42 running around 420-450 with misfire, I reckoned high 10s or low 11s would of been doable on day if car went smooth. My Hawkeye needed around 600bhp to get below 11 seconds. |
Originally Posted by dazdavies
(Post 12031178)
Do not under estimate how difficult those extra tenths are to achieve.
My Hawkeye needed around 600bhp to get below 11 seconds. P.S Update to mine as you know to 9.763 @ 148mph https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...f78d6e380e.jpg |
Originally Posted by MartynJ
(Post 12034059)
Couldn't agree more Daz, far harder than people think when you start getting to the quick end of things.
P.S Update to mine as you know to 9.763 @ 148mph https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...f78d6e380e.jpg |
Originally Posted by scooby2.5maz
(Post 12034165)
What turbo you running Martin ? I remember you was getting some pretty decent times on the s206 back in the day ! 😀
Yeah the S206 did well at the time considering the basic spec of the engine, I reckon on the current motor setup it'd run very low 10s now on the same turbo. |
Originally Posted by dazdavies
(Post 12031178)
Do not under estimate how difficult those extra tenths are to achieve.
My Hawkeye needed around 600bhp to get below 11 seconds. mines a classic full weight btw. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands