When I look up films which have say been banned or are talked about as being shocking, I like to read a rough synopsis or plot. Not to spoil the impending but to see if indeed the shocking nature is within my personal limits. I can deal with films like "The Human Centipede", "Gorutesque" and the suh like. Hell, I may even (dare I say it) enjoy a really shocking movie, but as mentioned above, as soon as pedophilia, incest and the such are involved... it loses my interest. Raping a new born baby is not shocking (well it is), it's sick and beyond a reasonable limit. If say "A Serbian Film" had the scenes of torture or rigar mortis (sp) but not the baby rape or dad raping his own sons anus to the point of heavy rectal bleeding; then yeah curiosity may have seen me watch it on my computer or when I'm alone. My Mrs knows I like gorey horror films but she doesn't, and I sure as hell wouldn't put something like that on infront of my son.

But, I digress, I'm rambling and tired so will leave my thoughts there.

One last thought though - what sort of character would have edited all the taken footage to make the 'original' pre-cut, pre edit version :eek: I bet they had nightmares :(

So you do torture and necrophilia, but draw the line at paedophilia. What distinctions do you make, then? :)