is all that needs saying on the subject

+2

The media seems to get its rocks off on this subject, and always in favour of the wimmins. It's pathetic.
Most men will admire a sexy dressed wimmins but most would only admire. Nothing more. :thumb:

Time for a "Diet Coke" break. :)

***Edited by webteam***

Very clever.

Using secondary accounts to circumvent bans will only mean the initial ban will get extended instead.

Tony, you said in another thread that soldiers should not be regarded as victims, as they were not pressganged into what they do. Much the same as women that dress and act as sluts should not be regarded as victims because they are not pressganged into their attire and actions? I'm just spitballing here, which way do you want to go on it?

Ha ha, perhaps an unfortunate choice of example by me, but hopefully I can still convince you I am not batting for the other side? I suppose I should have said if I dont want the sh1t kicked out of me I wouldn't wear a Celtic shirt in the middle of Ibrox.

You are still saying that a women dressing in a certain way is provoking rape.

"wee" being the operative word here. And i am not talking about how tall you are ;)

That's why I prefer midgets and other circus occupiers!

Yes well I can't speak for men with peculiar fetishes and uncontrollable urges who are prepared to rape some woman.

Of course you are right that you should be able to wear what you want without having to fear any kind of an attack.

The fact is, there are people like that about, we seem to read most days about women being shamefully attacked, its a fact of life, like all the other bad actions that keep on happening. If a woman dresses in a provocative manner then you have to assume that she is more likely to get attacked if seen by one of the loonies!

Its a bit like looking before you cross the road in a way. not that many pedestrians do that any more now!

Les

Nice effort Tony. No, I am suggesting you cant have it both ways. I'm not for one minute suggesting that.

I really dont want women to dress in old baggy sacks, apparently it is good for us to see the female form and we are preprogrammed to look, there are ways to do it, i.e. being subtle and look away if you are going to get caught and record as much footage as you possibly can !

I find that I can look at the female form and put the sexual aspect to one side for a minute and just appreciate the aesthetics of it all.

hey if they are proud enough to wear skimpy clothes, i'm proud enough to look.

This started two months ago in Canada.

http://canada.videosift.com/video/Ca...irst-Slut-Walk

judge pickles many years ago was reported to have stated in his summing up in a rape trial to the woman that "in my opinion, woman with skirt up runs faster than man with trousers down"!

Despite your tendency to bash anyone who disagrees with your trolling / pathetic PC doctrine, I'll stick my neck out and say yes. If you were in prison and spent half your time bending over in the shower then I suggest you'd be part-responsible for the sausage-hiding that would result. There are sick people in society and in prisons and completely ignoring this is fact is well, a bit thick.

Not that difficult really was it?

"sausage hiding" :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

The third one on the right would get it....phwoar!! :o

They want to reclaim the word slur ? well from my experienc itbis only women that use that word anyway . and then it is usually to put down another woman.

A woman dressed in smart clothes which suit her figure will look far more attractive than one dressed to show us all she has got.

Les

All that needs saying on the subject really!! :thumb:

To lighten the mood slightly. Warning very bad language and robust humour!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jaiMzLhliA

Equally wouldn't happen if men were not gerenrically so stupid though.

For every woman that wrongly cries "rape" theres 100 men who have got themselves into a dangerous situation becasue they've been thinking only with their cocks.

Its not rocket science, but then maybe it is to a pup ;)

Are you seriously suggesting you can compare someone who signs up to take part in war with someone who dresses up for a night out?

***shakes head in disbelief****

He's not having it both ways. There is no comparison

(Slightly shocked that I am actually supporting TDW on something)

Are you totally informed on what I was commenting about? I was saying that he cannot deny the soldiers dying is a tragedy, then in the next breath (maybe not the next breath) he shows he is unsure about the term tragedy when he uses the word to describe female victims of abuse/untoward attention. They are both victims, just trying to educate him.