wicked no other word for it.

what a same the dog didnt turn on them.

put these *******s in the cell with venables so that thay can kick f***k out of each other then set the winner alight and watch him burn f***king scum

I can remember when on the news it was often reported that in South Africa that a favoured form of retribution was to place a tyre around the head of that said person and then the tyre would be set alight, If people are capable of doing that what chance have any of us got ?

it probably did hence being doused in petrol and set alight

So,your saying the dog bit them,and thats the reason it was set alight??????

Were you there????????

Of course......it probably went a bit like this - "oh no! My dog has tried to bite me! I must therefore tie it to a static object and burn the evil out of it at once!" :rolleyes:

Is that in English?

not so long ago they did the same to humans

Sorry,you no speeky our lingo:wonder:

:lol1: Seriously.....can you not see the irony...
Oh yeah, and someone's spelling or grammar are the very least of the issues here, try and bring some kind of argument to back up your, obviously well thought out, statement :lol1:

It's a bl00dy aweful crime, nothing should be treated that way, end of. imho :thumb:

Not round here they didn't:cuckoo:

ouch

try telling that to Edward Wightman

http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0...hing_large.jpg

and i think the person responsible should have the same treatment done to them

Have you just been watching Dr Who or Back To The Future????

Shock horror :eek::eek::eek: Whatever shall I do? :wonder:

So, why do you reckon it would be ok to set a dog on fire for doing what dogs sometimes do? Any come back apart from the dull comments re spelling mistakes and typo's? Or just here for sh1ts and giggles :luxhello:

OK, fair enough, you gave up the game too early though, amatuer :lol1::lol1:

Maybe their parents should be included-for setting a bad example!

Les :(