ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Where do we stand?(Legal advice) (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/740180-where-do-we-stand-legal-advice.html)

GlesgaKiss 22 January 2009 12:38 AM

:D There is a place quite close to me that you wouldn't make it out of alive if you had a bit of green on you. In fact, they had to repaint a few shops in the town which were green because they were having hastle.

One of the reasons I'm not into football. And most of them don't even know what they're fighting about...the thick cnuts.

Tidgy 22 January 2009 12:46 PM


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442659)
Want the money back at all costs. More a matter of principal than anything else. As I said I don't know if they have written confirmation, but we certainly havn't had anything in any of the remittance advice or anything even mentioning the damage or the fact that we had to repay it. All we were sent was remittance advice with a large amount deducted with no mention of it being deducted, and no explanation as to why, it was just missing from the total.

The person I'm talking about here is my Dad, so I'm obviously taking it very personally.


send em a bill for the outstanding balance to start with.

GlesgaKiss 22 January 2009 11:14 PM


Originally Posted by Tidgy (Post 8445471)
send em a bill for the outstanding balance to start with.

They have already told him he will not be getting the money.

MMT WRX 23 January 2009 08:58 AM

You said your father did actually damage the materials, does he have any idea what the replacement value of these would be and how that compares to the deduction made?

Maybe the company needed to order the replacement materials before they knew the final cost of damage implication.

Hindsight: Wouldn't your dad have been better to push this a bit more at the time and possibly involve his own insurance if necessary.

I agree, it does seem very underhand method to get their financial loss back. Normally I would have expected a meeting to establish actual cost of damage/replacement, any consequential loss and possible ways to repay.

Does he expect the company to cover the cost for the damage?

nixxon 23 January 2009 09:16 AM


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8447522)
They have already told him he will not be getting the money.

Let them know you will be taking legal action,first, and give them a couple of weeks to pay, or your case will probably be thrown out.
Just the threat is often enough.
It ,might be worth reminding them that his liability insurance will deal with it.
Good luck, and let us know the outcome.
Nick

nixxon 23 January 2009 09:20 AM


Originally Posted by MMT WRX (Post 8447890)
You said your father did actually damage the materials, does he have any idea what the replacement value of these would be and how that compares to the deduction made?

Maybe the company needed to order the replacement materials before they knew the final cost of damage implication.

Hindsight: Wouldn't your dad have been better to push this a bit more at the time and possibly involve his own insurance if necessary.

I agree, it does seem very underhand method to get their financial loss back. Normally I would have expected a meeting to establish actual cost of damage/replacement, any consequential loss and possible ways to repay.

Does he expect the company to cover the cost for the damage?

How were the materials damaged?
I take the view that if I supply the materials, and I F up, it's down to me. If my client supplies the materials, and I F up, it's down to them! Saves arguing about the quality of the materials, etc...

MMT WRX 23 January 2009 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by nixxon (Post 8447933)
How were the materials damaged?
I take the view that if I supply the materials, and I F up, it's down to me. If my client supplies the materials, and I F up, it's down to them! Saves arguing about the quality of the materials, etc...

Good point, I don't know. I am reading that they were maybe other materials, stock or even WIP, not necessarily materials his father was going to use.

If we damaged property during our work I would expect to sort things out either by payment, replacement or using my insurance.

My brother in law is a site manager of a reputable building company that have done loads of major work at Kings Mill hospital Nottingham, Notts new police HQ, new fire stations and are currently doing an approx £14m building at a local University, he generally controls dozens of contractors every day.

I could ask him how they would resolve it. Maybe a few facts would help like trade, what materials and who supplied them, how they got damaged etc.

I suspect that a claim will result in a counter claim that could potential get out of hand.

GlesgaKiss 23 January 2009 01:26 PM

The damaged material was 1 concrete panel, which he was fitting.

As stated in earlier posts: he was fully expecting the cost of it to be deducted from the agreed price. It was nothing to do with the second job(months later), which was completed perfectly, and since ordering the replacement panel during the first job there had been no mention of it. Just deducted from price of second job with nothing in writing.

Thanks for all the input, but this thread really has so many different opinons on it now that it's becoming confusing. We have also been in touch with the citizens advice bureau, and they recommend going through the small claims process as well, so that is exactly what we're going to do.


Thanks again for all the help. I'll update this thread with how it all turns out.

Peanuts 23 January 2009 01:43 PM


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
we don't know if they have it logged.

They have it logged or they wouldn't have brought it up.


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
He was warned beforehand that the company is run, and makes it's profit in underhand ways...

How is the fact that you/he thought he had got off scott free but been stung in the end underhand


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
but this just takes the p*$$ in my opinion.

You're joking right?


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
It's obvious whether they were legally right or wrong, that he has been tricked into doing this job so it would be cheaper for them.

Tricked? WTF! its not cheaper for them they had to replace the materials, listen, in the building game timespan is nowadays king, deadline is everything.
If your man had his final account settled and the damaged goods were brought up then yes, this would be out of order, if it was never brought up then its still fair game as the debt is not settled.


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
Don't know how good an idea it is to deny all knowledge, as he has more chance of being tripped up somehow along the way.

How can he be tripped up?
You are starting to come across as a bit whiny tbh, no offense, but if your mate hadn't damaged the goods then none of this wouldn't matter


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
He's sent a letter off to a solicitor, but was just wanting a few opinions.

Thats money wasted then


Originally Posted by TerzoAlan (Post 8442617)
Cheers

You're welcome :)


You can probably tell I work for a principal contractor :thumb: ;)
At the end of shift, your mate has a choice, accept the work and conditions or go down the road, it IS his choice but I can assure you that in the current climate there are a dozen more skins waiting in the wings to take the job if he doesn't like it.
It may seem harsh but its the truth, I turn away at least half a dozen guys a day asking for work, its a labour rich environment at the moment.


What this seems to boil down to is that your mate thought he got off scott free but go busted later on for it after he blew the bit of cash he squirreled aside was spunked ;)

Tell him that it comes down to the settled final account, end of.
If the damage is noted and not costed then he is in the clear, if nothing mentioned then he has the choice to accept his next final account with deduction, or try to fight it and lose the money and any chance of another contract with the firm.

GlesgaKiss 23 January 2009 04:07 PM

All I can say again is that I will post the outcome.

You have very little understanding of what is going on here. Well, let's face it, after posting the senseless drivel above you can't expect me to take you seriously?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands