ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Excuse me Mr Blair.... did I hear "Sorry"???? (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/370454-excuse-me-mr-blair-did-i-hear-sorry.html)

ajm 13 October 2004 10:59 PM


Originally Posted by TORQUEamada
I'm just here to dish out some justice to those who are mean to puddy-tats.

Not that there is anything you can do to change my feelings towards cat ownership. You are, for all intents and purposes, impotent in that respect.... it must be terribly frustrating for you! :hjtwofing

:D

TORQUEamada 13 October 2004 11:01 PM


Originally Posted by ajm
Not that there is anything you can do to change my feelings towards cat ownership. You are, for all intents and purposes, impotent in that respect.... it must be terribly frustrating for you! :hjtwofing

:D

Not as frustrating as having someone elses cat violate your home and garden eh mr a55hole?:razz: :hjtwofing :p

ajm 13 October 2004 11:05 PM


Originally Posted by TORQUEamada
Not as frustrating as having someone elses cat violate your home and garden eh mr a55hole?:razz: :hjtwofing :p

There is no way you could know that unless you had been a victim yourself... in which case, good! :D

Besides, my cat problems have all but been..... how shall we say... Eliminated. :norty:

Give us a purrr! :D

TORQUEamada 13 October 2004 11:08 PM

Victim? No, I train my cats to go and do their business in other people's gardens. If some low life decides to off them then no problem,there is an endless supply of moggies at my local rescue centre.

Be seeing you.:sleep: :sleep:

ajm 13 October 2004 11:13 PM

Yeah, see you.... whatever username you are using next. :D

Sith 13 October 2004 11:13 PM

People mention Trolls and up pops PSLewis spouting sh!t............Don't think we need Derek Acohra to solve that one. :D

Buckrogers 13 October 2004 11:14 PM

You going as well Pete, night night...

imlach 13 October 2004 11:18 PM

The psychology of the 'anon' poster quite often results in them posting under their "usual" username in the same thread - an often vain attempt to disassociate themselves with their 'anon' username - ie, if I post as "normal me", no-one will think the anon person can be me.....

ajm 13 October 2004 11:21 PM


Originally Posted by imlach
The psychology of the 'anon' poster quite often results in them posting under their "usual" username in the same thread - an often vain attempt to disassociate themselves with their 'anon' username - ie, if I post as "normal me", no-one will think the anon person can be me.....

It would be even more ironic if that post was the one pointing out the psychology of such behaviour! :eek:


;)

imlach 13 October 2004 11:22 PM


Originally Posted by ajm
It would be even more ironic if that post was the one pointing out the psychology of such behaviour! :eek:


;)

I did think someone would suggest that as soon as I mentioned it :D :D
Safe to say, I don't hate you that much ajm :D

Of course, that could also be seen as another dissasociation :D :D

ajm 13 October 2004 11:26 PM


Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
Do you think TORQUEamada is ajm ?

Come on Jason, do YOU think I am? ;)

I have stated before that I don't use aliases... whether or not you believe that isn't really a concern of mine :D



Originally Posted by imlach
I did think someone would suggest that as soon as I mentioned it :D :D
Safe to say, I don't hate you that much ajm :D

Of course, that could also be seen as another dissasociation :D :D

A double twist..... I like it! ;)

ajm 13 October 2004 11:30 PM


Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
I was having a 'jab' at imlach actually, but you strike me as someone who could effectively argue against himself ... :D

LOL! I have to! Where else would I find a worthy opponent? ;)

imlach 13 October 2004 11:31 PM


Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
I was having a 'jab' at imlach actually, but you strike me as someone who could effectively argue against himself ... :D

...not a very effective jab then :D

ajm 14 October 2004 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
What are you like :p

I thought the majority of your posts were made attempting to score points off a teenager ;)

Missed this crafty little edit. Thought you'd sneak in a dig in the dead of the night eh? ;)

To what teenager do you refer? Surely you didn't fall for that pathetic exit strategy did you? It was an embarrassingly poor way of throwing in the towel and I think the "teenager" knows it, which is why we are treated to sporadic reappearances as part of his futile attempts to regain self respect. :D

And while we are on the subject of point scoring Jason, it hasn't escaped my attention that whenever I am participating in one of "these" threads I can be assured that you will be there snapping at my heels like a viper in the grass! ;)

MooseRacer 14 October 2004 09:52 AM

Do vipers snap at heels? :confused:

Leslie 14 October 2004 10:16 AM

Seems to be little point in justifying it all by the removal of SH when he said at the beginning that he was not going to war for the sake of regime change, which is internationally illegal anyway.

Pity about the many thousands of innocent Iraqi lives lost during the war and after on top of the ones murdered by SH, and the destruction of their country which is still happening of course.

I'd prefer to vote for a party which I thought might do some good for the country, not just because I thought they are going to be the winning party!

Les

tiggers 14 October 2004 10:40 AM

Hunting horses, heel snapping vipers, intelligent fish - Scoobynet has it all doesn't it? ;)

ajm 14 October 2004 10:50 AM

It certainly gets its fair share, doesn't it! ;)

Jye 14 October 2004 10:53 AM

lol thought this might be a serious political thread, wooops :D

Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is :Suspiciou

Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France ;) :D

ajm 14 October 2004 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by Jye
lol thought this might be a serious political thread, wooops :D

Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is :Suspiciou

Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France ;) :D


LOL! :D

OllyK 14 October 2004 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Sith
People mention Trolls and up pops PSLewis spouting sh!t............Don't think we need Derek Acohra to solve that one. :D

Not that Derek Acorah would tell you much, but I am sure he could invent a nice vague tale for you.

SiPie 14 October 2004 12:06 PM


TORQUEamada, one would have thought that, had you done your homework properly, you would know that gutter level communication is of no interest to me and is certainly of little consequence to me. So when you are done with your feeble, tiresome insults I *may* take the time to address your obvious "issues".
But yet you've solely managed to turn this into 3 pages... you sure like bait :rolleyes:

Anyway.....Blair should apologise only for following Bush so blindly, but any actions against SH were surely justified (irrespective of finding any WMD) and long overdue. Obviously sad to see so many civilian and Armed Forces casualties (as in any war).

gsm1 14 October 2004 12:32 PM

The NL line is that they will only apologise for the intelligence being wrong.

The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".

Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".

The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.

EvilKyote 14 October 2004 12:44 PM

hmmm Just a thought....

pslewis....

Politically
Sad
Looser
Eternally
Winging
In
Scoobynet

:hjtwofing :p

ajm 14 October 2004 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by SiPie
But yet you've solely managed to turn this into 3 pages... you sure like bait :rolleyes:

No, people like YOU have turned this into 3 pages by interjecting with prospective, puny little digs that require correction by myself.

And yes, I do like bait, because if the trap is harmless then bait is little more than free food, is it not? :D

unclebuck 14 October 2004 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by gsm1
The NL line is that they will only apologise for the intelligence being wrong.

The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".

Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".

The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.

Well said.

SiPie 14 October 2004 01:33 PM


And yes, I do like bait, because if the trap is harmless then bait is little more than free food, is it not?
LOL :D:D

Leslie 14 October 2004 02:07 PM

Spot on GSM1

Les

Jye 14 October 2004 02:18 PM

Perhaps that's why pissy lewis like bLiar so much, they both have noses as long as my arm :)

||VaNDaL|| 14 October 2004 02:19 PM

A spokesman for United States president George W. Bush and British
Prime Minister Tony Blair has moved to sort out a mass media misunderstanding on the leaders both calling inquiries into their flawed intelligence.

"The media all over the world seems to believe that the inquiries will
be into intelligence information Mr Blair and Mr Bush were given before
committing their countries to attack Iraq," the spokesman said.

"But that is not the case at all. The inquiries will be into the ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE of the two men. With elections coming up in both countries, we want to clear doubts about their mental capacity to lead once and for all. Are they nuts or what?

"We still believe that weapons of mass destruction might perhaps be
found in Iraq at some point in the future, possibly by archeologists digging in the next millennium, but we feel we have a duty to find some public servant scapegoats for the whole mess, declare both leaders mentally highly intelligent and get on with getting them re-elected so they can try to do better in their next terms.

"And if they fail our IQ tests, lose the trivial pursuit game and fare
badly in The Price Is Right, well, I envisage them co-authoring a new
book, How To Run A Country For Dummies."


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands