The woman had balls nothing else to it,more balls than any other PM over the years leading up to present.
slate her all you like,but at least she stood her ground and didn't take any crap... This country could with someone like her right now,unless you're F1,i'm too young to remember....:razz: |
Originally Posted by DYK
(Post 11065093)
The woman had balls nothing else to it,more balls than any other PM...
|
Originally Posted by warrenm2
(Post 11064895)
Your statements prove otherwise
You say it has benefits then ignore them. The WHOLE of society benefits as capitalism progresses, that's the point. As you saw from the video, people get healthier, live longer and have higher standards of living. Its not for you to decide either how much one person needs, it also is not a zero sum game, by me being rich doesn't make you poor. Yes Well you know my opinion of your thinking skills on this one... In fact as your previous and next comments goes to show... No, that's about dealing with the unsustainable levels of debt we have. Nothing to do with capitalism, all to do with crap politicians. If you're unable to see the difference, you have proved my point. Maggie was a supporter of sound money btw... |
Originally Posted by Einstein RA
(Post 11065337)
Opinions are like arseholes.......You can take a scalpel and dissect my statements to your heart's content it makes no difference to me. Given your background I'm not surprised at your zealous defence of capitalism.
Its a simple matter of observation, what happens when you let people get on with things with minimal interference, compared to what happens when a huge state tries to run everything. Both experiments have been tried, will you believe the evidence of your own eyes? |
Originally Posted by Einstein RA
(Post 11065337)
Opinions are like arseholes.......You can take a scalpel and dissect my statements to your heart's content it makes no difference to me. Given your background I'm not surprised at your zealous defence of capitalism.
|
Originally Posted by warrenm2
(Post 11065408)
Not sure what "my background" has to do with the strength of an argument, I always try to post supporting evidence for my POV. Wasn't aware I had posted anything of "my background" on here of any relevance anyway.
Its a simple matter of observation, what happens when you let people get on with things with minimal interference, compared to what happens when a huge state tries to run everything. Both experiments have been tried, will you believe the evidence of your own eyes? |
Originally Posted by Einstein RA
(Post 11065455)
Warren I know you're an advocate of the laissez-faire school of thought. An advocate of Ayn Rand's philosophy. You believe in it and are passionate in it's ideology. Just because I am pointing at the cracks in capitalism doesn't mean I either have or support an alternative system. Maybe a benevolent dictator is the answer.
Ayn Rand wasn't just an advocate of laissez-faire. I think those advocating the 'use' for a society of capitalism or socialism are actually two sides of the same coin. |
Originally Posted by Einstein RA
(Post 11065455)
Warren I know you're an advocate of the laissez-faire school of thought. An advocate of Ayn Rand's philosophy. You believe in it and are passionate in it's ideology. Just because I am pointing at the cracks in capitalism doesn't mean I either have or support an alternative system. Maybe a benevolent dictator is the answer.
As for talking about failures in capitalism, there aren't any (apart from the need to prevent monopolies). Any current financial crises are due to sh!t Gvmt decisions in the past, spending more than they take in income, forcing banks to lend to people who cant afford a house, and enforcing counter-productive rules. And again I point out all the good capitalism has brought to standards of living all throughout the world. Just ask your parents about their lives when they were young compared to now. The change in a lifetime has been amazing, all through the power of "greed". You are trying to bite the hand that feeds you |
Originally Posted by warrenm2
(Post 11065741)
.
As for talking about failures in capitalism, there aren't any (apart from the need to prevent monopolies). Any current financial crises are due to sh!t Gvmt decisions in the past, spending more than they take in income, forcing banks to lend to people who cant afford a house, and enforcing counter-productive rules. |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11065875)
Laughable paranoid claptrap
|
Whatever anyone says, she was an outstanding leader making most politicians look like useless pygmies and she stood up for this country above all else. She dragged us out from the despond!
Les |
And for some light relief, here's a nice Northern Root Vole:
http://www.mammalwatching.com/Palear...20Vole%202.jpg |
Good effort. ^^^
However, I can 'trump' that:- http://imagesearch.s3.amazonaws.com/...monte_9426.jpg |
Joz - saw that last week and chuckled! :lol1:
|
It was on HIGNFY. ;)
|
I like those voles!
Les :) |
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11067632)
I like those voles!
Les :) lol Les, you nut. :lol1: ...And you'll be pleased to hear, neither of those rodents are socialists. ;) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands