Negative interest rates
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you lose money if you save it??
I presume you are referring to:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21600946
I presume you are referring to:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21600946
Last edited by Gear Head; 27 February 2013 at 12:48 PM.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But great if you can get a credit card at -20% pa
The theory is that the negative rates apply to banks to encourage them to loan out their money to boost the economy rather than sitting on it. A similar effect will be achieved in the High Street by charging for current accounts.
The theory is that the negative rates apply to banks to encourage them to loan out their money to boost the economy rather than sitting on it. A similar effect will be achieved in the High Street by charging for current accounts.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But great if you can get a credit card at -20% pa
The theory is that the negative rates apply to banks to encourage them to loan out their money to boost the economy rather than sitting on it. A similar effect will be achieved in the High Street by charging for current accounts.
The theory is that the negative rates apply to banks to encourage them to loan out their money to boost the economy rather than sitting on it. A similar effect will be achieved in the High Street by charging for current accounts.
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
It's to encourage people to spend instead of 'save' lol. ,people got cash in the bank
Last edited by dpb; 27 February 2013 at 01:17 PM. Reason: I presume
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could write an essay on this, but won't.
Negative interest rates have been part and parcel of banking for years now, but probably a new concept for most people. Essentially yes it means you have to pay to keep your money on account. In the Sterling market at present, you can place money with the Bank of England at +0.50% if you have a reserve account (ie big banks only).
There have been reports that the Bank of England have discussed (and to clarify for the hard of thinking from previous experience that does NOT mean they are considering it) negative interest rates, although the first step would probably be 0%. That's in line with the European Central Bank where rates are effectively zero, even though the "official" rate is 0.75%
But until rates go negative, as they have in Switzerland, Denmark etc, people do not change their behaviour, and even then, it's marginal. The cost of transferring capital is too high. Negative rates will not in themselves ensure higher lending, just as Quantitative Easing hasn't. But it's an option, and it's been discussed. Europe is likely to see negative interest rates before the UK, but there's resistance due to the perceived desperation of crowbarring people into lending money rather than relying on the strength of the economy to achieve the same result. For the man in the street, that will mean most banks will charge for current accounts.
Negative interest rates have been part and parcel of banking for years now, but probably a new concept for most people. Essentially yes it means you have to pay to keep your money on account. In the Sterling market at present, you can place money with the Bank of England at +0.50% if you have a reserve account (ie big banks only).
There have been reports that the Bank of England have discussed (and to clarify for the hard of thinking from previous experience that does NOT mean they are considering it) negative interest rates, although the first step would probably be 0%. That's in line with the European Central Bank where rates are effectively zero, even though the "official" rate is 0.75%
But until rates go negative, as they have in Switzerland, Denmark etc, people do not change their behaviour, and even then, it's marginal. The cost of transferring capital is too high. Negative rates will not in themselves ensure higher lending, just as Quantitative Easing hasn't. But it's an option, and it's been discussed. Europe is likely to see negative interest rates before the UK, but there's resistance due to the perceived desperation of crowbarring people into lending money rather than relying on the strength of the economy to achieve the same result. For the man in the street, that will mean most banks will charge for current accounts.
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think, and Tel will correct me if I'm wrong, that this is really more to do with large financial institutions hanging onto money. If it costs them to keep it on deposit they will have to find something else to do with it ... like lend it out thereby stimulating the economy.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely. And if you're lucky enough to have a mortgage linked at less than 1% over the base rate, your lender will be obliged to pay YOU.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think, and Tel will correct me if I'm wrong, that this is really more to do with large financial institutions hanging onto money. If it costs them to keep it on deposit they will have to find something else to do with it ... like lend it out thereby stimulating the economy.
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is nothing to stop them putting it up to 10% above base due to 'increases in the cost of lending'.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mines 2% above base which I think is pretty excellent considering its only a 5 year old mortgage. They changed their policy soon after we got ours!! Don't think I'll be changing it any time soon!! lol
#19
Scooby Regular
We are however part of the interest-only time bomb that will probably start going off in about 15 years time.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Grantham
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think, and Tel will correct me if I'm wrong, that this is really more to do with large financial institutions hanging onto money. If it costs them to keep it on deposit they will have to find something else to do with it ... like lend it out thereby stimulating the economy.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
Very unlikely. If they do bring in negative interest rates they will probably follow what has been done elsewhere, keep the base rate unchanged and introduce a new deposit rate. If they did reduce the base rate any further it would probably be the death knell for a number of smaller building societies.
#25
Scooby Regular
You and I have wasted time in the past arguing over petty semantics - referred to above I believe. Lets not start now theres a good chap.
#27
If the banks decide to charge us for having a current account, would we still be affected similarly if we put the cash into a building society.
If everyone did that I would expect the banks to be pretty seriously affected themselves.
Les
If everyone did that I would expect the banks to be pretty seriously affected themselves.
Les
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts