View Poll Results: Giving to wild animal charities or starving children charities?
Wild Animals, etc
17
77.27%
Children living in poverty, etc
5
22.73%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll
Curious to know... giving to wild animal charities or starving children charities?
#1
Curious to know... giving to wild animal charities or starving children charities?
After watching that new BBC series program called 'Africa', it really got me thinking about this...
You see all these magnificent wild animals and creatures slowly dwindling away while the human population continues to grow, and more and more buildings are being built, etc, it can only get worse for the animals? The bit where David Attenborough was talking about the future of the animals was really moving.
While on the other hand, you see adverts and programs for all these children living in poverty in countries such as Africa, it makes you wonder who deserves to be helped more?
Probably quite a touchy subject but would be interested to see your comments on this.
You see all these magnificent wild animals and creatures slowly dwindling away while the human population continues to grow, and more and more buildings are being built, etc, it can only get worse for the animals? The bit where David Attenborough was talking about the future of the animals was really moving.
While on the other hand, you see adverts and programs for all these children living in poverty in countries such as Africa, it makes you wonder who deserves to be helped more?
Probably quite a touchy subject but would be interested to see your comments on this.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Animals for me, people in these African countries need to realise they can't keep doing what they are doing by having lots of babies if they can't look after them or feed them, animals on the other hand have no choice and can't be educated or told otherwise..
I'm expecting this to be another b1tch fest thread as the do gooders tell me how wrong I am.
I'm expecting this to be another b1tch fest thread as the do gooders tell me how wrong I am.
#4
Scooby Regular
Totally agree with the above posts, animals for me and send half the population to the moon or somewhere to free up some space as its getting a bit crowded in here!
Mick
Mick
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chester
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I donate to both animals and children, but closer to home. I have small direct debits for the RSPCA and nspcc.
I'm also considering a donation to somewhere like age concern/help the aged.
I'm also considering a donation to somewhere like age concern/help the aged.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
I started going to church at the start of the year as women, drugs and drink didn't really solve my personal problems. Last week in church I listened to two upper class *****, you know the type that would ignore you on the street (let alone a homeless person) talk about their ego boosting adventure over to Africa. For the first time God actually spoke to me and said, "mate this is bull****." Don't think I'll be back.
#13
Too many people on the planet, we're too successful a species. Everyone is breeding too much everywhere. It isn't a matter of being able to afford it as money isn't real. More people born, more resources used, more food needs to be produced, so more deforestation, more carbon released, more fckucked up seas. Loads of important causes and charities. I would encourage everyone to support their local Wildlife Trust which will spend money on conservation in your county.
#14
I don't give money to charities monthly, i do however organise/participate in charity events which I contribute to. I wouldn't give any money to charities working outside the UK. We have enough problems with children being abused and living in horrific conditions here which get airbrushed over. Sort them out and I might think twice.
#18
They have no choice but to be brought up in the manner in which their parents show them - neglect, abused, starved and with no opinionated voice (and that's just in our small country).
PDSA prioritise pets, so not always wildlife. How are the living conditions and quality of life with these pets potentially any different to the suffering some young children have in these homes?
Not saying you shouldn't give to animal charities, just food for thought
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Personally, I never give to people based charities. You might think that's a heartless decision but I have my reasons.
Here's an example, I have an aunt with advanced Alzheimer's. She has never been offered any help from charities dealing with this illness.
I saw something on telly recently asking for donations for a charity dealing with Epilepsy. My partner is epileptic (I'm her carer) I've never seen any charity beating down her door to help her.
Don't get me started on cancer charities. I believe these so called charities are the reason we don't have a cure for cancer. Think about it;To many peoples livelihood depends on charitable funding. If they came up with a cure, they'll be out of a job.
I believe that very little (if any) of the money raised actually goes to a good cause, due to so called "administration" fees and so on.
I do however donate to animal based charities, Dogs trust, and Cats protection. Also my local wildlife rescue centre.
Here's an example, I have an aunt with advanced Alzheimer's. She has never been offered any help from charities dealing with this illness.
I saw something on telly recently asking for donations for a charity dealing with Epilepsy. My partner is epileptic (I'm her carer) I've never seen any charity beating down her door to help her.
Don't get me started on cancer charities. I believe these so called charities are the reason we don't have a cure for cancer. Think about it;To many peoples livelihood depends on charitable funding. If they came up with a cure, they'll be out of a job.
I believe that very little (if any) of the money raised actually goes to a good cause, due to so called "administration" fees and so on.
I do however donate to animal based charities, Dogs trust, and Cats protection. Also my local wildlife rescue centre.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Our NBO group last year donated to the injured firefighters charity and when we saw the excellent work and equipment they purchased with our NBO money we were delighted
I like animals but worried about how much goes to national administration but quite happy to support our local animal charity shop
Starving children
Different matter
I sponser some of the misses relatives in phillipines but the trouble is they can't seem to help themselves and keep on having more children as its "gods way ' instead of pulling out at the last minute or putting something on the end of it
The religion they follow so closely is half of Asia and Africa's problem
Flame suit on
Ten pager coming up
Once the heavyweights come on later to stir it up
Fi fan has checked in allready
I like animals but worried about how much goes to national administration but quite happy to support our local animal charity shop
Starving children
Different matter
I sponser some of the misses relatives in phillipines but the trouble is they can't seem to help themselves and keep on having more children as its "gods way ' instead of pulling out at the last minute or putting something on the end of it
The religion they follow so closely is half of Asia and Africa's problem
Flame suit on
Ten pager coming up
Once the heavyweights come on later to stir it up
Fi fan has checked in allready
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And children aren't defenceless?
They have no choice but to be brought up in the manner in which their parents show them - neglect, abused, starved and with no opinionated voice (and that's just in our small country).
PDSA prioritise pets, so not always wildlife. How are the living conditions and quality of life with these pets potentially any different to the suffering some young children have in these homes?
Not saying you shouldn't give to animal charities, just food for thought
They have no choice but to be brought up in the manner in which their parents show them - neglect, abused, starved and with no opinionated voice (and that's just in our small country).
PDSA prioritise pets, so not always wildlife. How are the living conditions and quality of life with these pets potentially any different to the suffering some young children have in these homes?
Not saying you shouldn't give to animal charities, just food for thought
#23
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Proud to say that my family support Oxfam in its brilliant works across the lobe, we also support/sponsor a child in Haiti. And no I do not prioritise animals over people.
I think we should realise that we are part of the problem, simply saying that they need to breed less is mindless, WE in the rich parts of the world need to consume less of the planets resource, only then can we start lecturing others on sustainable living!
I think we should realise that we are part of the problem, simply saying that they need to breed less is mindless, WE in the rich parts of the world need to consume less of the planets resource, only then can we start lecturing others on sustainable living!
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I never give to people based charities. You might think that's a heartless decision but I have my reasons.
Here's an example, I have an aunt with advanced Alzheimer's. She has never been offered any help from charities dealing with this illness.
I saw something on telly recently asking for donations for a charity dealing with Epilepsy. My partner is epileptic (I'm her carer) I've never seen any charity beating down her door to help her.
Don't get me started on cancer charities. I believe these so called charities are the reason we don't have a cure for cancer. Think about it;To many peoples livelihood depends on charitable funding. If they came up with a cure, they'll be out of a job.
I believe that very little (if any) of the money raised actually goes to a good cause, due to so called "administration" fees and so on.
I do however donate to animal based charities, Dogs trust, and Cats protection. Also my local wildlife rescue centre.
Here's an example, I have an aunt with advanced Alzheimer's. She has never been offered any help from charities dealing with this illness.
I saw something on telly recently asking for donations for a charity dealing with Epilepsy. My partner is epileptic (I'm her carer) I've never seen any charity beating down her door to help her.
Don't get me started on cancer charities. I believe these so called charities are the reason we don't have a cure for cancer. Think about it;To many peoples livelihood depends on charitable funding. If they came up with a cure, they'll be out of a job.
I believe that very little (if any) of the money raised actually goes to a good cause, due to so called "administration" fees and so on.
I do however donate to animal based charities, Dogs trust, and Cats protection. Also my local wildlife rescue centre.
I also would never give to animal charities, nor to overseas charities, we have enough problems in this country to sort out!
I also have a bit of a problem with what I tend to call 'non-charities' these being charities which I find it hard to see how they help anyone, but I wont start on these (i.e. the eden project) for fear of a monumental rant comencing!!
Anyways, just my 2 peneth, for what its worth.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Proud to say that my family support Oxfam in its brilliant works across the lobe, we also support/sponsor a child in Haiti. And no I do not prioritise animals over people.
I think we should realise that we are part of the problem, simply saying that they need to breed less is mindless, WE in the rich parts of the world need to consume less of the planets resource, only then can we start lecturing others on sustainable living!
I think we should realise that we are part of the problem, simply saying that they need to breed less is mindless, WE in the rich parts of the world need to consume less of the planets resource, only then can we start lecturing others on sustainable living!
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep 2 key ones
The United States, with only 5% of the global population, uses 30% of the world's natural resources. Other major industrialised countries also consume natural resources to a far greater extent than an equitable distribution would allow
Only about 25% of the world's people live in developed countries, yet they use 80% of its non-fuel minerals.
The United States, with only 5% of the global population, uses 30% of the world's natural resources. Other major industrialised countries also consume natural resources to a far greater extent than an equitable distribution would allow
Only about 25% of the world's people live in developed countries, yet they use 80% of its non-fuel minerals.
#29
Scooby Regular
and if we paid the true cost of products, made using raw materials exported from the third world, they would be much much more expensive
but it is coming tbh , food on the rise (unless you like Romanians putting in the ingredients) Oil/Petrol/Energy - all on the rise
it is all going to get more and more expensive
in fact I hope thing get so expensive that cvnts on this forum have to emigrate to Africa
but it is coming tbh , food on the rise (unless you like Romanians putting in the ingredients) Oil/Petrol/Energy - all on the rise
it is all going to get more and more expensive
in fact I hope thing get so expensive that cvnts on this forum have to emigrate to Africa
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post