Is is normal?
#5
Scooby Regular
Of course it's not normal. Take a look at the different IQ scales. Anything in the 130 region is very intelligent, and over 140 ish is classed as 'genius'. However the person you know got that score, they are clearly gifted in some respect.
Trending Topics
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was going to suggest BS anyway. "Genius" is up in the 140-160 range (top 1%) and the bell curve gets very thin, very quickly above that.
#12
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
So now we are getting somewhere. The Bell curve (assuming normal distribution) gets very very thin for IQ' above say 150 and below 50.
So. It isn't Normal to be in those ranges because the number of people meeting that criteria must number somewhat less than 2.5 % of the population at both ends of the scale?
So. It isn't Normal to be in those ranges because the number of people meeting that criteria must number somewhat less than 2.5 % of the population at both ends of the scale?
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The idea of the IQ is that the mean value should be set and that 95% of the population should fall between two standard deviations of the mean. Most of the time IQ tests are set to have a mean of 100 and 15 as their standard deviation which means 95% of the population should score between 70 and 130.
Given that only 5% score outside of this and the distribution drops away even further the further you get from the mean then a score of 210 is not normal no, it's exceptionally high, but like I said not possible on most modern IQ tests which due to scoring granularity restrictions have a practical maximum - 161 in the case of the Cattell III B as mentioned above.
So no it's not 'normal' although that word needs to be used with care
Given that only 5% score outside of this and the distribution drops away even further the further you get from the mean then a score of 210 is not normal no, it's exceptionally high, but like I said not possible on most modern IQ tests which due to scoring granularity restrictions have a practical maximum - 161 in the case of the Cattell III B as mentioned above.
So no it's not 'normal' although that word needs to be used with care
#16
There's huge debate over how accurate a measure of intelligence IQ tests are and has been for years, but that aside, a score of 210 is markedly above 'normal' results - 100 points or so.
#17
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Ok. We (I believe) have established that if you are outside of the 95% I.e the 2.5% to the left and 2.5% to the right, that could be fair to say it is NOT normal.
#20
I don't think it's true to say that outside the 70-130 band is not normal. Historically someone with an IQ of 70 or less was considered mentally retarded, but people with IQs in the 130-150 range are likely to be indistinguishable from people in the 70-130 band.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I know where you are going here btw
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
That iq is higher than Steven Hawkings iq so your mate is either one of the smartests people in the world or he talks a load of bollocks, I think I would go with the second one.
Doesn't look like there has been many people with an iq of over 200.
http://mostextreme.org/highest_iq.php
Doesn't look like there has been many people with an iq of over 200.
http://mostextreme.org/highest_iq.php
Last edited by stevebt; 07 February 2013 at 11:26 PM.
#24
but people with IQs in the 130-150 range are likely to be indistinguishable from people in the 70-130 band