When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's more hygienic, looks & smells better. Uncircumcised men can produce a lot of smegma. You need to clean under the foreskin daily to prevent this. The downside is that you MAY lose some sensitivity.
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Einstein RA
It's more hygienic, looks & smells better. Uncircumcised men can produce a lot of smegma. You need to clean under the foreskin daily to prevent this. The downside is that you MAY lose some sensitivity.
So, wash and you will be fine!
I think performing this on a perfectly healthy child is quite frankly, barbaric.
It's more hygienic, looks & smells better. Uncircumcised men can produce a lot of smegma. You need to clean under the foreskin daily to prevent this. The downside is that you MAY lose some sensitivity.
I disagree on the sensitivity part, speaking from experience. Infact it is the contrary.
Did you lose sensitivity Wurzel? It's not clear from your post.
Well obviously at 5 I had no idea if it was sensitive or not but I find it sensitive now even at my ripe old age. Don't get me wrong the old fella can take a beating but during sex it is sensitive.
Good. Butchering a child because he might believe in fairy tales later in life is a joke.
What this man says is correct, to mutilate a child in this day and age is absolutely horrifying, it should be left up to the person to make such decisions later on in life 18+
It will be banned in all modern countries soon enough.
Well obviously at 5 I had no idea if it was sensitive or not but I find it sensitive now even at my ripe old age. Don't get me wrong the old fella can take a beating but during sex it is sensitive.
Got you. I'd take the decrease in sensitivity statement with a pinch of salt! My own sensitivity (circumcised btw) over the years is anywhere from extremely sensitive to flippin' hair-trigger
I'm circumcised for medical reasons. Never bothered me that much either way really. However....
The judgement added: "The child's body is permanently and irreparably changed by the circumcision. This change conflicts with the child's interest of later being able to make his own decision on his religious affiliation."
It's more hygienic, looks & smells better. Uncircumcised men can produce a lot of smegma. You need to clean under the foreskin daily to prevent this. The downside is that you MAY lose some sensitivity.
As collected by a university rugby team and spread into the sandwiches of the opposing team
Got you. I'd take the decrease in sensitivity statement with a pinch of salt! My own sensitivity (circumcised btw) over the years is anywhere from extremely sensitive to flippin' hair-trigger
I agree with the ban as per Jack post, you are hacking off bits of a kids body who gets no say to it.
I also agree there can be compelling medical reasons for doing so, another is that have a circumcision actually helps prevent HIV infection for example. It should be the boys choice or only performed for genuine medical reasons
What this man says is correct, to mutilate a child in this day and age is absolutely horrifying, it should be left up to the person to make such decisions later on in life 18+
It will be banned in all modern countries soon enough.