Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Solar panels

Old 22 January 2019, 05:41 PM
  #1  
tarmac terror
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Solar panels

Can anyone help explain to me which way round a solar panel should be fitted - I don't mean the direction it should face.

The panel itself is rectangular, I have fitted it with its longest dimension facing up the pitched roof. Looking at some of the full roof installs on houses near where I live, I am seeing some panels fitted with the long side pointing upwards, some have the shortest side pointing upwards. I don't know if there are reasons for this beyond it being a best fit to cover the whole roof area.

The manual and background reading does explain the direction in which to point the panel, and the optimal angle, but it mentions nothing about whether the panel can be fitted any way round or not.
Old 22 January 2019, 06:27 PM
  #2  
BMWhere?
Scooby Senior
 
BMWhere?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Friedrichshafen Germany/Preston UK
Posts: 3,631
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

shouldn't make any difference as the glass will not be polarised, so you could mount at any angle you wish, although most tend to stick to straight horizontal or vertical!

The optimal tilt angle will depend on your latitude and time of year, but most people just mount simply flat on the roof and make do. The direction should also ideally track the sun, but again a stationary mount is most common so as close to south (northern hemisphere) as possible.
Old 22 January 2019, 07:00 PM
  #3  
tarmac terror
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who said this forum was dead!!!!! Thanks for that BMWhere? - I worked out the added cost for tilting bracket or tracking mount wasn't justified, the gains for a single panel capable of 120W would be marginal.

It's on the roof, long side up and charging the battery in daylight. Some meters and switches ordered from e-bay to complete the install - it has been quite an interesting project so far.
Old 22 January 2019, 07:49 PM
  #4  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

We just got 100 w panel over xmas to safeguard electric supply to chicken hatchery - this is in zim
im pretty sure more than enough would come from just bolting it through the wall , but the primary concern is nobody steals it ( someone eloped with whole hot water system during the building the place , through the roof )
Probably less of a concern here
Old 22 January 2019, 09:23 PM
  #5  
tarmac terror
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
We just got 100 w panel over xmas to safeguard electric supply to chicken hatchery - this is in zim
im pretty sure more than enough would come from just bolting it through the wall , but the primary concern is nobody steals it ( someone eloped with whole hot water system during the building the place , through the roof )
Probably less of a concern here
Have my shed over-watched by CCTV, but that's about the contents getting taken, rather than the panel itself getting taken. You considered shear bolts, and mounting in to masonry? Torque up the fastener until the head shears off, which leaves a button head which can't be undone. Wont stop a determined thief taking a grinder to the brackets though.
Old 23 January 2019, 07:25 AM
  #6  
BMWhere?
Scooby Senior
 
BMWhere?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Friedrichshafen Germany/Preston UK
Posts: 3,631
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarmac terror
I worked out the added cost for tilting bracket or tracking mount wasn't justified, the gains for a single panel capable of 120W would be marginal.
That's why nobody really does it!

Currently building an energy efficiency house and going through the whole energy planning. Will have underfloor heating heated with a heat pump and ventilation system with a heat exchanger. 7KW of solar panels with battery storage and excess sold back to the grid. The house has been designed with an optimal roof angle to maximise the solar power. If the calculations are correct, I should be a net electricity supplier with a large surplus in the summer months and a small buy back in the winter. Also fitting a wood burner which is cleverly integrated in the ventilation system to heat the whole house, so can be further used to reduce winter electricity consumption and bring further savings.

German government is giving me nearly €20K in subsidies for energy efficient building and with a total investment of €25K for the energy system, I should easily recoup my investments within 5 years! The best part though is being a net electricity supplier, so I will have a monthly income rather than bills and essentially remove the risk of rising electricity prices!
Old 23 January 2019, 07:05 PM
  #7  
tarmac terror
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BMWhere?
That's why nobody really does it!

Currently building an energy efficiency house and going through the whole energy planning. Will have underfloor heating heated with a heat pump and ventilation system with a heat exchanger. 7KW of solar panels with battery storage and excess sold back to the grid. The house has been designed with an optimal roof angle to maximise the solar power. If the calculations are correct, I should be a net electricity supplier with a large surplus in the summer months and a small buy back in the winter. Also fitting a wood burner which is cleverly integrated in the ventilation system to heat the whole house, so can be further used to reduce winter electricity consumption and bring further savings.

German government is giving me nearly €20K in subsidies for energy efficient building and with a total investment of €25K for the energy system, I should easily recoup my investments within 5 years! The best part though is being a net electricity supplier, so I will have a monthly income rather than bills and essentially remove the risk of rising electricity prices!
Great project - half the fun in that for me would be tuning it all once built, to get the outputs you want as cheaply / efficiently as possible. You got a blog / thread on that as it progresses - would be an interesting one to watch.
Old 23 January 2019, 07:29 PM
  #8  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,032
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarmac terror
Who said this forum was dead!!!!! Thanks for that BMWhere? - I worked out the added cost for tilting bracket or tracking mount wasn't justified, the gains for a single panel capable of 120W would be marginal.

It's on the roof, long side up and charging the battery in daylight. Some meters and switches ordered from e-bay to complete the install - it has been quite an interesting project so far.

My 80watt panel gives varies by just under 1amp in relation to angle of inclination to the sun (6amps max on a sunny day) between flat and 45 degrees. That’s facing it south at mid day, but obviously current flow is affected a lot more by the direction of the panel rather than the inclination. It’s used in combination with a 120Ah car battery which gives me just enough power to run the beer cooler for a long weekend.

Keep meaning to to build a High current DC-DC converter so I can fast charge the battery from the car with the engine off, off the shelf units capeable of more than 30amps are just too expensive (ignoring the Chinese things that’ll catch fire).

Last edited by ALi-B; 23 January 2019 at 08:16 PM.
Old 24 January 2019, 06:01 AM
  #9  
hedgecutter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
hedgecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: far, far west
Posts: 3,730
Received 640 Likes on 466 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BMWhere?
That's why nobody really does it!

Currently building an energy efficiency house and going through the whole energy planning. Will have underfloor heating heated with a heat pump and ventilation system with a heat exchanger. 7KW of solar panels with battery storage and excess sold back to the grid. The house has been designed with an optimal roof angle to maximise the solar power. If the calculations are correct, I should be a net electricity supplier with a large surplus in the summer months and a small buy back in the winter. Also fitting a wood burner which is cleverly integrated in the ventilation system to heat the whole house, so can be further used to reduce winter electricity consumption and bring further savings.

German government is giving me nearly €20K in subsidies for energy efficient building and with a total investment of €25K for the energy system, I should easily recoup my investments within 5 years! The best part though is being a net electricity supplier, so I will have a monthly income rather than bills and essentially remove the risk of rising electricity prices!
I'm doing something similar, but on a listed building, so with various restrictions, and limited grants. I'm also limited by the local transformer capacity.
Old 24 January 2019, 10:21 AM
  #10  
BMWhere?
Scooby Senior
 
BMWhere?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Friedrichshafen Germany/Preston UK
Posts: 3,631
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarmac terror
Great project - half the fun in that for me would be tuning it all once built, to get the outputs you want as cheaply / efficiently as possible. You got a blog / thread on that as it progresses - would be an interesting one to watch.
I thought about blogging it in the beginning, then quickly realised I've no time for it!

Its all quite fascinating though! Building using a pre-fab company local to me here in Germany. The pre-fab builds are so advanced now, they can achieve far greater energy efficiency for a fraction of the costs compared to traditional builds. I also have full design flexibility, so I'm really building "my" house! Its a wooden construction with a traditional plaster finish, so from the outside you couldn't tell the difference from a traditional build. The wood is all machine cut to within 1mm tolerance. The windows are delivered before they start construction, so the holes for the windows are cut to fit the delivered window frames perfectly rather than the typical oversized holes which are then padded to the windows which is a huge point of energy losses. Production is in a clean, dry workshop with an army of seemingly very happy workers who were all very friendly when I did a factory tour. Will take 6 days to manufacture before being packed on a truck and shipped to the building site, where on site assembly takes just three days. Fitting out is then completed within a month, then depending on the weather at the time I can either move straight in or have to wait for another month or two for everything to dry out. I'm also building a cellar (pretty standard over here), that is also pre-fabricated concrete walls with a concrete base laid on site. Celler construction starts one month before the house build and the house plans will be adjusted to the finished cellar measurements to ensure a perfect fit!

The German government has a really great incentive scheme for energy efficient new-builds which is also linked to government loan for up to €100,000 - In Germany, its typical to split your mortgage across multiple lenders! The scheme is based on achieving energy savings related to the average German house which gets re-assessed every few years (last time 2016) to force a continued energy saving. There are various levels; KFW70 is the minimum build standard, then there is KFW55, KFW40, KFW40+ and Pasiv - the number stands for the % of energy needed to heat the house based on the current average - So essentially, the minimum build standard requires you to save 30% energy compared to the average. I'm building to KFW40+, so a 60% energy saving over the average, the "+" being that it's fitted with renewable energy source which will supply more electricity than you consume. A "Pasiv" house requires that your only active heating source is a wood burning fire which heats water, otherwise all heating has to come from the sun through clever windows which let heat in but not out and solar heating panels on the roof. My house will actually be built to "Pasiv" standard, including the clever windows, but as I have a full heating system, I only qualify for KFW40+. Each standard affects the level of grants you can receive, the interest rate you get on the loan and your council tax rate afterwards. To qualify, I had to do a "KFW" plan to detail the building standard and envisaged energy consumption before applying for the finance. Once the building is completed, I then have to pass a "blower-door" test, where they attach a big fan in the place of the front door and pressurise the house to measure how air-tight it is. Once the test is passed, then the grants are released in the form of a loan repayment on the government credit. I should get €15,000 for the KFW40 and an additional €5,000 minus the cost of the KFW plan (~€600) for the solar install

The total build cost is about the same as building to the KFW70 standard using traditional construction techniques without solar and would get no grants (you could still get the €5,000 if you fitted solar). So essentially, I'm saving 30% energy for no additional outlay simply by using a modern construction technique. Plus I'm saving myself a countless amount of stress by not having to deal with tradesmen and all the various construction problems! No wonder nearly 40% of the houses being built in Germany now are pre-fabricated. There is a lot of skepticism about building pre-fabricated houses, so many people still build traditionally as they see it as a lower risk, plus a large percentage of plots are sold to developers who still build brick houses, so the purchaser often has no choice anyway. Still, Germany is leading the way with pre-fab building and energy efficient housing - the UK has a lot of catching up to do in this area, but without any financial incentives from the government, progress will be slow!

Last edited by BMWhere?; 24 January 2019 at 10:22 AM.
Old 24 January 2019, 12:07 PM
  #11  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Wow @BMWhere - yes indeed the UK has a lot of catching up to do!

I'm in the process of converting an old stone barn, though in the end only part of the back wall will remain (and a dividing internal) as the rest is ropey, so will come down and be replaced with modern blockwork/insulation with stone facing. Floor is being dug up/replaced and will have u/floor heating. Triple glazing throughout & new (reclaimed slate roof with insulation). Will probably have an ASHP and solar water feeding into a heat store + a wood burning stove w/back boiler. 8kw solar in the garden on a scaffold frame - I am also limited by local transformer capacity but you can cap how much you put into the grid. Might do a GSHP as I have the land for it but depends on budget in the end (I can get the ASHP essentially free).

Aim is to have as little outlay on energy as possible in the future.
Old 24 January 2019, 12:30 PM
  #12  
BMWhere?
Scooby Senior
 
BMWhere?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Friedrichshafen Germany/Preston UK
Posts: 3,631
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Thanks!

As I understand it, for renovation work, solar water heater panels are a far more cost effective solution than fitting solar electric cells.

If you are heating water with electric, then the best way is via an air to water heat pump, but for most renovations that is not possible due to space restrictions, hence using solar water instead.

If you have room to fit a heat pump, then that is the way to go!
Old 24 January 2019, 03:48 PM
  #13  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I have an ASHP on the main house (it will be holiday rental once conversion completed) and it costs a friggin' fortune in electricity. House is cavity wall but had a fire in the 70s and was repaired badly, leaving crap in the cavities that breach the gap, so I can't add insulation but have done the best otherwise (roof, windows, big pipes/rads). If I was living there full time, then I would be looking at 20,000+ kwh a year and even part-time it was 9000 kwh last year. I try not to use the ASHP for heating and rely on a wood stove.

For the renovation I'm fortunate enough to be able to use modern construction for nearly all of it, so it will be well insulated. We get RHI over here and there are some schemes around that you can get an ASHP and Solar Water for free as long as you let them have the RHI. That suits me as my total budget is minimal and I am doing as much of the work as possible. Solar electric is to provide power for the ASHP during the day + other amenities. Solar water for hot water with the back up of the stove and/or a solar immersion (why not use solar to top up HW if not being used elsewhere). If I had the money then I would have chosen a GSHP instead as much more efficient.

I'm hoping that the whole thing will not require too much energy anyway as should end up being less than 90 sqm over 2 floors and super insulated.
Old 24 January 2019, 07:03 PM
  #14  
BMWhere?
Scooby Senior
 
BMWhere?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Friedrichshafen Germany/Preston UK
Posts: 3,631
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Always a problem with old buildings that you waste so much energy through the building itself. Even new houses with traditional build are pretty inefficient. Pre-fab building let's you get the best compromise between cost and energy efficiency.
​​​​​
​​​​​​On a refurb, there is not much you can do other than clad it and add roof insulation. Even with new windows, you'll get big losses around the frame gap.

I love the idea of a GSHP, and for a refurb it could be a great solution, but for a new build to the highest energy standards, you'd probably never recover the investment costs Vs an ASHP (at least I wouldn't in my remaining lifespan!).

The company that's building my pre-fab have an awesome solution in their 7 storey fitting-out centre. They have a huge water tank in the basement and use a water source heat pump. Over the winter, they great from the water in the tank which eventually freezes. In the summer, they then reverse the system and cool the building storing the extracted heat back in the water tank ready for hearing again the next winter. Combined with solar on the roof, they are essentially heating and air conditioning a seven storey commercial building for free and with zero emissions! If only all businesses did that, we could solve global warming right there!
Old 24 January 2019, 08:43 PM
  #15  
RobsyUK
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
RobsyUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Milk on Beans
Posts: 6,403
Received 183 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Remember to put that caging up to stop pigeons nesting.

I hear pigeons love using solar panels as a hotel. Like eating the wires too
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vallumlj
Non Scooby Related
2
23 August 2011 01:19 PM
EddScott
Non Scooby Related
60
25 July 2011 11:34 AM
Janspeed
Non Scooby Related
1
16 March 2008 06:43 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Solar panels



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 PM.