North Korea - so what would YOU do?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
North Korea - so what would YOU do?
Now climate change may do us all in in a couple of hundred years but Kim-Jong-Il, the totally evil b,astard who runs North Korea could well destroy much of the world in the next decade as he develops nukes that may work. He is possibly the only world leader that would be prepared to sacrifice his own country to make a point.
So what should we do about him? The West seems to have kept a lid on Iran's nuclear ambitions and Israel could always step in if Iran breaks too many rules.
A N Korean coup seems unlikely and what a bloodbath that would be. More sanctions just means more starvation to the mass of N Korean citizens and S Korea would be reluctant to take on the might of the N Korean military. Interesting that China supported the recent UN condemnation and may be reluctant to give N Korea much support. Is the US missile defence system fool proof? A US/Japanese/S Korea take over is a big call.
Ideas into suggestion box please before he kills us all.
David
Last edited by David Lock; 14 February 2017 at 12:21 PM.
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Collaboration between several governments, to the tune of say £500mil Could tempt a hit man or team of mercenarys to take him out.
Off the books of course
Or the UK could donate a fully armed Trident for him to test fire, much the same effect really
Off the books of course
Or the UK could donate a fully armed Trident for him to test fire, much the same effect really
Last edited by Steve001; 14 February 2017 at 01:00 PM.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TBH its getting to the stage where need to hit his military structure. It's not like ISIS where your trying to find military in civilian areas. NK has airbases, army bases etc etc. which will be mince meat for most military forces, also china wont step in and start a war over NK given they are p!ssed off with them.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may as well ask what should we do about radical Islam.
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may as well ask what should we do about radical Islam.
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
Very different situations.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You may as well ask what should we do about radical Islam.
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
There is nothing to be done other than for his own countrymen (supporters) to decide he no longer represents their interest.
How many heads of foreign governments are we allowed to depose simply because we don't like their bullying ways?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Seems the Malaysians have the right idea
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-38971655
Just read the article and.....
Mr Kim was poisoned at the airport by two women, believed to be North Korean operatives.
This is to be confirmed BUT this nutter has a long history of doing in relatives, and he potentially has a finger hovering over the 'button'
Scary
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-38971655
Just read the article and.....
Mr Kim was poisoned at the airport by two women, believed to be North Korean operatives.
This is to be confirmed BUT this nutter has a long history of doing in relatives, and he potentially has a finger hovering over the 'button'
Scary
Last edited by Steve001; 14 February 2017 at 02:42 PM.
#11
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Now climate change may do us all in in a couple of hundred years but Kim-Jong-Il, the totally evil b,astard who runs North Korea could well destroy much of the world in the next decade as he develops nukes that may work. He is possibly the only world leader that would be prepared to sacrifice his own country to make a point.
So what should we do about him? The West seems to have kept a lid on Iran's nuclear ambitions and Israel could always step in if Iran breaks too many rules.
A N Korean coup seems unlikely and what a bloodbath that would be. More sanctions just means more starvation to the mass of N Korean citizens and S Korea would be reluctant to take on the might of the N Korean military. Interesting that China supported the recent UN condemnation and may be reluctant to give N Korea much support. Is the US missile defence system fool proof? A US/Japanese/S Korea take over is a big call.
Ideas into suggestion box please before he kills us all.
David
https://www.engadget.com/2014/11/13/...mpanies-first/
http://uk.businessinsider.com/zero-d...16-7?r=US&IR=T
Last edited by The Trooper 1815; 14 February 2017 at 04:27 PM.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cyber tech will have an effect, just like it did on the Iranian centrifuges.
https://www.engadget.com/2014/11/13/...mpanies-first/
http://uk.businessinsider.com/zero-d...16-7?r=US&IR=T
https://www.engadget.com/2014/11/13/...mpanies-first/
http://uk.businessinsider.com/zero-d...16-7?r=US&IR=T
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree. Both situations are idealogical, and you can't defeat an idea with external intervention.
And Saddam was the equivalent 'smoking gun', albeit of a chemical weapon (supposedly). That piece of intervention worked well didn't it?
I'm not saying I know the answer, he's a crackpot for sure, but any attempt at aggressive suppression is going to leave the west with egg on its face - again.
I'm not saying I know the answer, he's a crackpot for sure, but any attempt at aggressive suppression is going to leave the west with egg on its face - again.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Close, the test fired Trident was American.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
I disagree. Both situations are idealogical, and you can't defeat an idea with external intervention.
And Saddam was the equivalent 'smoking gun', albeit of a chemical weapon (supposedly). That piece of intervention worked well didn't it?
I'm not saying I know the answer, he's a crackpot for sure, but any attempt at aggressive suppression is going to leave the west with egg on its face - again.
And Saddam was the equivalent 'smoking gun', albeit of a chemical weapon (supposedly). That piece of intervention worked well didn't it?
I'm not saying I know the answer, he's a crackpot for sure, but any attempt at aggressive suppression is going to leave the west with egg on its face - again.
There's a major difference between a chemical weapon and a nuclear bomb. Perhaps we should stand by until he explodes one or more on a Western mainland and then act? That doesn't sound like a workable solution to me.
#27
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While the leadership seem to have fanatical support it isn't as strong as made out. Even the senior members struggle to toe the party line, look how many are continually executed. Plus the issue isn't with NK going around blowing places up, at the minute, it's more to do with the threat they pose when they have the capability. T
he affect of taking out NK military structure but leaving the hierarchy in place would remove any risk to outside country's. Which is where it differs from ISIS.
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
You need to check your history before you boast about that. It's very true, there were many Irish who joined the Allies in the fight against fascism. Disgracefully, instead of being greeted as heroes when they returned to their own country they were treated like dogs. Their names were distributed throughout the country so that they found it impossible to find work and support their families. This was because the majority of Irish so hated the British they wanted the ***** to win. So much for neutrality.