Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Abortion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 July 2015, 01:29 PM
  #91  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJ Dunk
Having spent 7 months in a NICU recently, I've seen babies born at 24 weeks. One couple that we got to know quite well now have their baby at home who is doing very well. Yes, they needed a lot of major medical intervention and had lots of subsequent issues, but those babies were very much more than a collection of developing cells. They were babies, human beings; strong enough to fight and continue their lives.

Sadly, we also experienced those for whom the fight was too much, but I'm left with no doubt in my mind that at 24 weeks they are very much viable, very much alive, very much a baby in the truest sense.
What are your thoughts on Devildog's assertion his "collection of cells" only develop a "sense of awareness or existence" "from the minute they are born" rather than in the womb? Is that your experience, Dunk? I was under the impression that unborn babies could react to music and other stimulae at a fairly early age.
Old 23 July 2015, 02:27 PM
  #92  
DJ Dunk
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
DJ Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not all those who wander are lost
Posts: 17,862
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my experience (I'm not a medical practitioner, just someone who's experienced premature births) their sense of 'awareness' can be apparent from as little as 20 weeks, some may say sooner.

A sense of existence is a little more hard to define and I don't think bears any relevance to the subject, personally.

From what I've experienced, 24 weeks is a baby. Not every organ is fully prepared for life on the outside, but it's unquestionably an aware, living being.
Old 23 July 2015, 07:56 PM
  #93  
Beef
Scooby Regular
 
Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.
Old 23 July 2015, 09:54 PM
  #94  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beef
Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.
If you think it's more than enough time, doesn't that mean you think the limit should be shorter?
Old 24 July 2015, 09:57 AM
  #95  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
Old 24 July 2015, 11:35 AM
  #96  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?
Old 24 July 2015, 11:38 AM
  #97  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.
Old 24 July 2015, 12:30 PM
  #98  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

when my wife was pregnant with our 3rd and then 4/5 (twins), she was in her mid/later 30's

so we went privately to the "Fetal Medicine Centre" in London to have an early nuchal scan, (I think 8 odd weeks, may have been twelve)

http://www.fetalmedicine.com/nuchal-scan

you get the results in minutes

no test is 100% but we felt it was worth it

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 24 July 2015 at 01:30 PM.
Old 24 July 2015, 01:02 PM
  #99  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?
Old 24 July 2015, 01:41 PM
  #100  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.
If the limit is reduced then extensions for the reasons you give should be allowed where appropriate to a cut-off point (which could be the current 24 weeks). Although I'd be interested to know whether there is any time-wasting going on that could be removed instead.

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?
8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.
Old 24 July 2015, 01:44 PM
  #101  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?
I only wish I had your empathy, my life could be so much more involving/complicated/tiresome.
Old 24 July 2015, 02:02 PM
  #102  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.
There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.
Old 24 July 2015, 04:18 PM
  #103  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.


Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
Old 24 July 2015, 08:42 PM
  #104  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
Not saying it's common, but it has been known for people to go right through a pregnancy without knowing, until labour of course.

4/5 months, I would imagine would be very possible if the likes of morning sickness was absent. Not every woman puts on a lot of weight during pregnancy, so could be forgiven for just thinking they were just putting a little on, without considering being pregnant as the reason. Again, I'm not saying this is something common, I haven't got figures to support one way or another, but I do know people that have only found out they were pregnant quite far along, also one person who fell pregnant with both her children while using the implant as a form of contraceptive. Bodies are funny things.....
Old 24 July 2015, 09:28 PM
  #105  
vindaloo
Scooby Regular
 
vindaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
I'm well aware of that, but it's only one or two blokes, and that's it!
It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request.
Old 24 July 2015, 10:36 PM
  #106  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vindaloo
It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request.
That's good to know. Please keep up with this good work, if you may.
Old 25 July 2015, 01:42 AM
  #107  
Ooperbum
BANNED
 
Ooperbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: ooperbum
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.
Old 25 July 2015, 02:43 AM
  #108  
brendy76
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
brendy76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bangor Co. Down.
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ooperbum
10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.
Taking a wild stab in the dark here (and judging by your username), it wasnt you then?
Old 13 February 2016, 09:19 PM
  #109  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

How odd.
Old 13 February 2016, 10:46 PM
  #110  
wrx300scooby
Scooby Regular
 
wrx300scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Prostate cancer got me, please get checked guys
Posts: 2,333
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
How odd.
Yorkshire, clearly
Old 14 February 2016, 11:37 AM
  #111  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What on earth?
Old 14 February 2016, 11:51 AM
  #112  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.
Old 14 February 2016, 02:54 PM
  #113  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.
Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type.
Old 14 February 2016, 03:22 PM
  #114  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type.
Yes. But it's also possible that he did bump this thread up for no apparent reason and called his own act of doing so- "How odd." Something like talking/commenting on self, I mean.

Anything is possible, when it comes to Sir alcy , you know. I wouldn't be surprised.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.