Sony backing down on release of The Interview
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 9,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sony backing down on release of The Interview
Surprised no-one's mentioned this.
All the celeb's are saying it's a terrible thing to back down over the hacking, but IMO, the film should never have went ahead in the first place! OK, it's all just a joke, but the guy's a nutter! Didn't they expect some kind of come back from him?
David Walliams, although decrying what Sony has done, said...
"It's a sad day when @SonyPictures bow to the will of a brutal dictator who murders his own people."
That says it all IMO, but in the opposite of what he was intending...
All the celeb's are saying it's a terrible thing to back down over the hacking, but IMO, the film should never have went ahead in the first place! OK, it's all just a joke, but the guy's a nutter! Didn't they expect some kind of come back from him?
David Walliams, although decrying what Sony has done, said...
"It's a sad day when @SonyPictures bow to the will of a brutal dictator who murders his own people."
That says it all IMO, but in the opposite of what he was intending...
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For me, as a defender of free speech, it's a sad outcome. Having said that, if I were the CEO of Sony or one of the other decision makers involved, it should go without saying that serious consideration be given to the interests of the business and I would probably have to demote artistic, ethical and philosophical notions. Unfortunately, that is bowing down to state-sponsored cyber-terrorism. There's no easy answer to this one.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
I'm all up for free speech but when fun is poked at somebody as unstable as that then perhaps a bit of tact wouldn't go amiss.
Didn't Sony even think what would happen if he did take it the wrong way? A little extreme to say but if innocent people were killed over this how would Sony react? How do you apologise to family members of the dead..............We are really sorry xxxxxxxxx was killed, we honestly thought poking fun at a unhinged war Lord was a good idea. ..............
Yeah good one Sony.....
Didn't Sony even think what would happen if he did take it the wrong way? A little extreme to say but if innocent people were killed over this how would Sony react? How do you apologise to family members of the dead..............We are really sorry xxxxxxxxx was killed, we honestly thought poking fun at a unhinged war Lord was a good idea. ..............
Yeah good one Sony.....
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Well I would say it's become next years 'Must See'..... hahahahaha
It will slip out, either on the newsgroups, or maybe SONY will do a straight to DVD release, but I reckon its done wonders for the publicity of the movie.
In fairness I think Sony were between a rock & a hard place with this one, but I tend to agree with the David Walliams quote above...
It will slip out, either on the newsgroups, or maybe SONY will do a straight to DVD release, but I reckon its done wonders for the publicity of the movie.
In fairness I think Sony were between a rock & a hard place with this one, but I tend to agree with the David Walliams quote above...
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure Sony has some kind of insurance for this type of thing, so they will still make money from it, though they'll likely still claim it's made a loss, and it's all the naughty hackers fault, and not the fact they use skewed accounting practices to make it seem as though they don't make money from films.
I think they should have gone ahead with the screenings regardless. It's setting a precedent for this type of thing. What happened to the whole "we don't negotiate with terrorists" type stance? If not from Sony, then from, for example, the US Government. If you cave, are you not then giving them what they want?
I think they should have gone ahead with the screenings regardless. It's setting a precedent for this type of thing. What happened to the whole "we don't negotiate with terrorists" type stance? If not from Sony, then from, for example, the US Government. If you cave, are you not then giving them what they want?
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm all up for free speech but when fun is poked at somebody as unstable as that then perhaps a bit of tact wouldn't go amiss.
Didn't Sony even think what would happen if he did take it the wrong way? A little extreme to say but if innocent people were killed over this how would Sony react? How do you apologise to family members of the dead..............We are really sorry xxxxxxxxx was killed, we honestly thought poking fun at a unhinged war Lord was a good idea. ..............
Yeah good one Sony.....
Didn't Sony even think what would happen if he did take it the wrong way? A little extreme to say but if innocent people were killed over this how would Sony react? How do you apologise to family members of the dead..............We are really sorry xxxxxxxxx was killed, we honestly thought poking fun at a unhinged war Lord was a good idea. ..............
Yeah good one Sony.....
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obama is saying Sony "Did the wrong thing" when they pulled the movie. FBI confirms that NK was behind (wether that is true remains to be seen)
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...-gop/20635449/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...-gop/20635449/
#14
Making a film about the death of someone who is still alive, however unlikeable that person is, is pretty bad taste IMO.
If this was done about our Queen I'd like to think there'd be a bit of annoyance from us.
If this was done about our Queen I'd like to think there'd be a bit of annoyance from us.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am aware of that. The point is that the Americans made a film taking the **** out of one dictator and obviously thought that as the list dictator didn't complain, they could get away with doing the same again. This time Team North Korea decided to be world police.
#17
To be fair our Queen isn't a murderous Dictator, well, if you believe the whole Diana thing was real she isnt.
#18
#19
Scooby Regular
I don't recall there being so much fuss when Team America was released which also lampooned the North Korean dictatorship.
Team America: World Police (6/10) Movie CLIP - I'm So Ronery (2004) HD - YouTube
Team America: World Police (6/10) Movie CLIP - I'm So Ronery (2004) HD - YouTube
The Interview will probably go to DVD and paid streaming and downloads next year.
I think they should have gone ahead with the release although I understand the fears they have, if you remember the nutcase at the Dark Knight premiere who went postal it's not impossible that something similar could have happened at release of The Interview.
I doubt there would have been any big military response from N.Korea directly but it would have been attacks which could be sited as those perpetrated by nutcases independent of N. Korea, even if they were actually state sanctioned.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Paramount has also blocked Team America being re-shown in cinema's recently.
The Interview will probably go to DVD and paid streaming and downloads next year.
I think they should have gone ahead with the release although I understand the fears they have, if you remember the nutcase at the Dark Knight premiere who went postal it's not impossible that something similar could have happened at release of The Interview.
I doubt there would have been any big military response from N.Korea directly but it would have been attacks which could be sited as those perpetrated by nutcases independent of N. Korea, even if they were actually state sanctioned.
The Interview will probably go to DVD and paid streaming and downloads next year.
I think they should have gone ahead with the release although I understand the fears they have, if you remember the nutcase at the Dark Knight premiere who went postal it's not impossible that something similar could have happened at release of The Interview.
I doubt there would have been any big military response from N.Korea directly but it would have been attacks which could be sited as those perpetrated by nutcases independent of N. Korea, even if they were actually state sanctioned.
#21
Scooby Regular
Absolutely right, shoulda mentioned that! Major chains are the ones effectively censoring due to fear. Still it stands that it's a backwards step and an unfortunate win for terrorism (in a cyber sense) and a mad dictator.
#22
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
The press surrounding it has instantly made this film a hit now, so its just a matter of time.
There's some subterfuge mixed in with these real events.
Time will tell.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The Interview has become Sony's highest-selling online film of all time"
http://news.sky.com/story/1399040/th...online-release