Notices

which engine a 2.1 stroker or 2.5 sti?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 August 2012, 02:28 PM
  #1  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question which engine a 2.1 stroker or 2.5 sti?

Im just testing the water here. basically im looking at possibly upgrading my classic standard uk2000. im looking eventually to reach a reliable 400bhp. so would it be cheeper to drop an ej257 in and uprate the pistons etc or do a total stroker build. im new to modding cars so id just like a few pointers thanks
Old 18 August 2012, 02:34 PM
  #2  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Forgot to add id be going for a six speed conversion too
Old 18 August 2012, 03:08 PM
  #3  
sssssteeeee
Scooby Regular
 
sssssteeeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

closed deck - stroker kit. if u want a real tough solid lump - 22B engine.
Old 18 August 2012, 04:04 PM
  #4  
BlueBugEye
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
BlueBugEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Littlehampton
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2.5 will be cheapest for reliable 400, std Sti lump can do that.
Old 18 August 2012, 05:19 PM
  #5  
Bez300
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Bez300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: in modiSTification
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

2.5 sti is only good for upto 350bhp, and reliability is a big MMMM if you are going to drive it hard.
I have had my 2.5 fully forged and now running 500BHP, very happy with it.
but having a 2.0 fully closed deck block and stroking it upto 2.1 will make a much stronger engine.
If I was to build another engine
1st choice would be 22b engine. 2.2 stroked upto 2.33
2nd choice would be 2.0 fully closed deck, stroked upto 2.1
3rd choice would be 2.5 forged as I have now.
Very happy with the power of the 2.5 and the torque is ace.
but it is the weaker block of the 3
a standard sti 2.5 will not take 400bhp for long

Bez

Last edited by Bez300; 18 August 2012 at 08:20 PM.
Old 18 August 2012, 06:11 PM
  #6  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info guys.....i think planting a complete 2.5 would be the cheapest option bit from what ive been reading and the fact my mate runs a 2.1 stroker i(which is awesome)m better off with the latter.

the next thing is heads. do i just have mine ported or try and get some version 3 sti heads or some other model?
Old 18 August 2012, 06:17 PM
  #7  
snake1906
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
snake1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: cornwall
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

id go with the built 2ltr over the 2.1 anyday as i have the 2.1 and its a struggle to get the power from standard fit turbo the 2ltr will make more power with the same turbo
Old 18 August 2012, 06:38 PM
  #8  
P555SBR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
P555SBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: derbyshire
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

chepest option would be a 2.1 stroker using a semi closed deck block as you dont need a rear thrust mod good for the 400bhp you want but are you going to stop at that level if not go with a cdb good for over 500bhp with the right internals the choice is your
Old 18 August 2012, 06:44 PM
  #9  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by helium3
Im just testing the water here. basically im looking at possibly upgrading my classic standard uk2000. im looking eventually to reach a reliable 400bhp. so would it be cheeper to drop an ej257 in and uprate the pistons etc or do a total stroker build. im new to modding cars so id just like a few pointers thanks
first question you need to ask yourself is how much do I want to spend. for a reliable genuine 400HP in a classic car it will be £10k. Search the forum. this topic has been done loads of times.
Old 18 August 2012, 10:40 PM
  #10  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
first question you need to ask yourself is how much do I want to spend. for a reliable genuine 400HP in a classic car it will be £10k. Search the forum. this topic has been done loads of times.

Like i said i was testing the water, tbh i love my scoob , its been standard for the 5 years ive had it so i guess anything over 300bhp is gona be a real boost. id like to have put about 7k in it. 10 is a little rich. i may aswell go with my 2nd option and go buy an r33 gtr ive seen. with a cat back , filters and a remap i should be close to 400 without much effort
. we will have to see when its crunch time
Old 18 August 2012, 11:21 PM
  #11  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Or there maybe a 3rd option. just seen a car on ebay with all the mods i need. engines fully forged and capable of 500bhp. 3,5k for the car, now that would be an easy fix
Old 18 August 2012, 11:55 PM
  #12  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

classic are notoriously expensive to modify to a reasonable amount of power. newage cars are much easier to tune and cost a lot less. I would tend to stay away from ebay cars unless it comes with a mountain of paperwork and proof to back up certain claims. engine capable of 500HP? probably with £10K worth of other modifications. just be careful.
Old 18 August 2012, 11:57 PM
  #13  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2.1 will be mine choice if its limited budget,if its budget 2.35L will be mine choice

We are running 2.1 with the MDX321T and is awesome combination


Jura
Old 19 August 2012, 08:22 AM
  #14  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, i think il keep doing research. i did think about getting a wide track blob with dccd and mod that to about 400. i think anything on the table at the minute, i cou ald afford 10k but then i may aswell by a newage already done for that kind of $. out of curiosity would version 3 sti type r make nearly 400? perhaps a new turbo and six speed?
Old 19 August 2012, 08:39 AM
  #15  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake1906
id go with the built 2ltr over the 2.1 anyday as i have the 2.1 and its a struggle to get the power from standard fit turbo the 2ltr will make more power with the same turbo
eh? a struggle to get power from a 2.1.
Old 19 August 2012, 09:04 AM
  #16  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by helium3
Thanks, i think il keep doing research. i did think about getting a wide track blob with dccd and mod that to about 400.
The most sensible option. lower tax bracket as well

Originally Posted by helium3
i think anything on the table at the minute, i could afford 10k but then i may as well buy a newage already done for that kind of $.
again be careful what you buy here. plenty of provenance and paperwork is the key. better to buy an unmolested, well serviced blobeye and then have the mods done right by a reputable tuner.

Originally Posted by helium3
out of curiosity would version 3 sti type r make nearly 400? perhaps a new turbo and six speed?
Yes no problem if you want to put the money into it. you will need a lot more than a new turbo and gearbox. basically everything in the engine bay needs changed. rods, pistons, bearings, you can reuse heads and cams maybe get them ported, fmic, modine, oil pump, fpr, better spark, better breathing, better fuelling, new ecu, new turbo (probably rotated), full six speed drive train, new clutch, better brakes, better suspension plus lots of wee things that you don't think about but cost money. £50 here, £80 there, next thing you know £1k has gone on things you can't even see but are very necessary. Trust me on this. things can get out of hand very quickly. Ask anyone who has a big power classic shape (i.e over 400HP car).

Now you see why it costs at least £10K. better of buying your blob and modifing it. If I had to do it again the widetrack blobeye would be my choice.
Old 19 August 2012, 12:07 PM
  #17  
helium3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
helium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
The most sensible option. lower tax bracket as well



again be careful what you buy here. plenty of provenance and paperwork is the key. better to buy an unmolested, well serviced blobeye and then have the mods done right by a reputable tuner.



Yes no problem if you want to put the money into it. you will need a lot more than a new turbo and gearbox. basically everything in the engine bay needs changed. rods, pistons, bearings, you can reuse heads and cams maybe get them ported, fmic, modine, oil pump, fpr, better spark, better breathing, better fuelling, new ecu, new turbo (probably rotated), full six speed drive train, new clutch, better brakes, better suspension plus lots of wee things that you don't think about but cost money. £50 here, £80 there, next thing you know £1k has gone on things you can't even see but are very necessary. Trust me on this. things can get out of hand very quickly. Ask anyone who has a big power classic shape (i.e over 400HP car).

Now you see why it costs at least £10K. better of buying your blob and modifing it. If I had to do it again the widetrack blobeye would be my choice.

yeah i think a modded blob with good paper work or a clean standard one might be the way to go. ive just been really happy with mine but shes gona need some tlc soon so figured id check out my options.

Last edited by helium3; 19 August 2012 at 12:08 PM.
Old 19 August 2012, 01:16 PM
  #18  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snake1906
id go with the built 2ltr over the 2.1 anyday as i have the 2.1 and its a struggle to get the power from standard fit turbo the 2ltr will make more power with the same turbo
Tosh, piffle and poppycock, lol.

Who built your 2.1 ?

What turbo is it fitted with and what associated modifications do you have ?

Why are you struggling to get power from it when plenty out there will help you achieve it, budget allowing of course ?

Having built more 2.1 engines than most, I can say categorically that the 2.1 is better than the 2 litre
Old 20 August 2012, 09:04 AM
  #19  
legacy_gtb
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
legacy_gtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^completely agree! Listen to Martynj, he knows his bananas!

A 2.1 is better than a 2.0 ..... but a 2.5 for a sub 450 road car beats them all hands down IMO .... no replaacement for displacement and for on road manners, torque is the new horsepower! :-)
Old 20 August 2012, 09:10 AM
  #20  
wms-racing
Former Sponsor
 
wms-racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Holywell
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by legacy_gtb
^completely agree! Listen to Martynj, he knows his bananas!

A 2.1 is better than a 2.0 ..... but a 2.5 for a sub 450 road car beats them all hands down IMO .... no replaacement for displacement and for on road manners, torque is the new horsepower! :-)
Totally agree, but it does depend on how you drive it, if you like to rev the thing, a 2.1 would be a better choice.
Old 20 August 2012, 05:56 PM
  #21  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wms-racing
Totally agree, but it does depend on how you drive it, if you like to rev the thing, a 2.1 would be a better choice.
actually 2.35 would be a better choice
Old 20 August 2012, 06:19 PM
  #22  
Ian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

just stroke your standard t2000 block to a 2.1
Old 20 August 2012, 06:31 PM
  #23  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As I always say.

For a road car that you don't want to rev to oblivion, forged 2.5, everytime. Put something like an SC46 on it and it'll spool like a VF35 and make 450 + all day long. It's just perfect for the road.

If you want something for the track or that you can rev though the ceiling, 2.1.

For both of the above you'll need the right supporting mods (deffo a 6 speed gearbox) to exploit their potential. You'll be into a 5 figure sum easily.

If you just want something on the cheaper side. A 2.5 with better pistons and HGs with the std turbo and the standard ancillaries just dropped into a classic would go like sh*t off a shovel and make a very nice road car. Can't promise your box would last though!

If you want something that'll get you to even higher levels and provide better response for the larger turbos required to get in the 550+ range than the 2.1, go with the 2.35, but then you're talking SERIOUS money.

Last edited by New_scooby_04; 20 August 2012 at 06:36 PM.
Old 20 August 2012, 06:39 PM
  #24  
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
stevep360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
actually 2.35 would be a better choice

Old 20 August 2012, 09:25 PM
  #25  
Bez300
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Bez300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: in modiSTification
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Glad some of you like the 2.5. you here so many guys saying they are no good, the torque on them is ace.
there are a few of you saying that the built 2.5s don't rev, Martin At Alan Jeffrey set the rev limit to 7900 how high do you want them to rev to?
with a 2.5 build you get a lot of area under the graph compared to the 2.1
Here is mine
Name:  scan0001.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  88.1 KB
not the highest power in the world, but its great to drive, and pull all through the revs

Bez
Old 20 August 2012, 09:27 PM
  #26  
keljon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
keljon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: plymouth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a my99 uk turbo 2000 classic and have come to the conclusion a newage sti 2.0 is the most cost effective upgrade although I prob won't go more than 350 ish because I don't want the added expense of changing the gearbox
Old 20 August 2012, 09:34 PM
  #27  
Bez300
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Bez300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: in modiSTification
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevep360
very nice build Steve

Bez
Old 20 August 2012, 09:40 PM
  #28  
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (15)
 
IainMilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the garage
Posts: 3,924
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevep360
+2
Old 20 August 2012, 10:06 PM
  #29  
beliblisk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
beliblisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ljubljana,Slovenia
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by keljon
I have a my99 uk turbo 2000 classic and have come to the conclusion a newage sti 2.0 is the most cost effective upgrade although I prob won't go more than 350 ish because I don't want the added expense of changing the gearbox
With 350 you might end up changing gearbox any way:P
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM



Quick Reply: which engine a 2.1 stroker or 2.5 sti?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM.