which engine a 2.1 stroker or 2.5 sti?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which engine a 2.1 stroker or 2.5 sti?
Im just testing the water here. basically im looking at possibly upgrading my classic standard uk2000. im looking eventually to reach a reliable 400bhp. so would it be cheeper to drop an ej257 in and uprate the pistons etc or do a total stroker build. im new to modding cars so id just like a few pointers thanks
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
2.5 sti is only good for upto 350bhp, and reliability is a big MMMM if you are going to drive it hard.
I have had my 2.5 fully forged and now running 500BHP, very happy with it.
but having a 2.0 fully closed deck block and stroking it upto 2.1 will make a much stronger engine.
If I was to build another engine
1st choice would be 22b engine. 2.2 stroked upto 2.33
2nd choice would be 2.0 fully closed deck, stroked upto 2.1
3rd choice would be 2.5 forged as I have now.
Very happy with the power of the 2.5 and the torque is ace.
but it is the weaker block of the 3
a standard sti 2.5 will not take 400bhp for long
Bez
I have had my 2.5 fully forged and now running 500BHP, very happy with it.
but having a 2.0 fully closed deck block and stroking it upto 2.1 will make a much stronger engine.
If I was to build another engine
1st choice would be 22b engine. 2.2 stroked upto 2.33
2nd choice would be 2.0 fully closed deck, stroked upto 2.1
3rd choice would be 2.5 forged as I have now.
Very happy with the power of the 2.5 and the torque is ace.
but it is the weaker block of the 3
a standard sti 2.5 will not take 400bhp for long
Bez
Last edited by Bez300; 18 August 2012 at 08:20 PM.
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info guys.....i think planting a complete 2.5 would be the cheapest option bit from what ive been reading and the fact my mate runs a 2.1 stroker i(which is awesome)m better off with the latter.
the next thing is heads. do i just have mine ported or try and get some version 3 sti heads or some other model?
the next thing is heads. do i just have mine ported or try and get some version 3 sti heads or some other model?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: derbyshire
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
chepest option would be a 2.1 stroker using a semi closed deck block as you dont need a rear thrust mod good for the 400bhp you want but are you going to stop at that level if not go with a cdb good for over 500bhp with the right internals the choice is your
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im just testing the water here. basically im looking at possibly upgrading my classic standard uk2000. im looking eventually to reach a reliable 400bhp. so would it be cheeper to drop an ej257 in and uprate the pistons etc or do a total stroker build. im new to modding cars so id just like a few pointers thanks
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like i said i was testing the water, tbh i love my scoob , its been standard for the 5 years ive had it so i guess anything over 300bhp is gona be a real boost. id like to have put about 7k in it. 10 is a little rich. i may aswell go with my 2nd option and go buy an r33 gtr ive seen. with a cat back , filters and a remap i should be close to 400 without much effort
. we will have to see when its crunch time
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
classic are notoriously expensive to modify to a reasonable amount of power. newage cars are much easier to tune and cost a lot less. I would tend to stay away from ebay cars unless it comes with a mountain of paperwork and proof to back up certain claims. engine capable of 500HP? probably with £10K worth of other modifications. just be careful.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, i think il keep doing research. i did think about getting a wide track blob with dccd and mod that to about 400. i think anything on the table at the minute, i cou ald afford 10k but then i may aswell by a newage already done for that kind of $. out of curiosity would version 3 sti type r make nearly 400? perhaps a new turbo and six speed?
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now you see why it costs at least £10K. better of buying your blob and modifing it. If I had to do it again the widetrack blobeye would be my choice.
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The most sensible option. lower tax bracket as well
again be careful what you buy here. plenty of provenance and paperwork is the key. better to buy an unmolested, well serviced blobeye and then have the mods done right by a reputable tuner.
Yes no problem if you want to put the money into it. you will need a lot more than a new turbo and gearbox. basically everything in the engine bay needs changed. rods, pistons, bearings, you can reuse heads and cams maybe get them ported, fmic, modine, oil pump, fpr, better spark, better breathing, better fuelling, new ecu, new turbo (probably rotated), full six speed drive train, new clutch, better brakes, better suspension plus lots of wee things that you don't think about but cost money. £50 here, £80 there, next thing you know £1k has gone on things you can't even see but are very necessary. Trust me on this. things can get out of hand very quickly. Ask anyone who has a big power classic shape (i.e over 400HP car).
Now you see why it costs at least £10K. better of buying your blob and modifing it. If I had to do it again the widetrack blobeye would be my choice.
again be careful what you buy here. plenty of provenance and paperwork is the key. better to buy an unmolested, well serviced blobeye and then have the mods done right by a reputable tuner.
Yes no problem if you want to put the money into it. you will need a lot more than a new turbo and gearbox. basically everything in the engine bay needs changed. rods, pistons, bearings, you can reuse heads and cams maybe get them ported, fmic, modine, oil pump, fpr, better spark, better breathing, better fuelling, new ecu, new turbo (probably rotated), full six speed drive train, new clutch, better brakes, better suspension plus lots of wee things that you don't think about but cost money. £50 here, £80 there, next thing you know £1k has gone on things you can't even see but are very necessary. Trust me on this. things can get out of hand very quickly. Ask anyone who has a big power classic shape (i.e over 400HP car).
Now you see why it costs at least £10K. better of buying your blob and modifing it. If I had to do it again the widetrack blobeye would be my choice.
yeah i think a modded blob with good paper work or a clean standard one might be the way to go. ive just been really happy with mine but shes gona need some tlc soon so figured id check out my options.
Last edited by helium3; 19 August 2012 at 12:08 PM.
#18
Scooby Regular
Who built your 2.1 ?
What turbo is it fitted with and what associated modifications do you have ?
Why are you struggling to get power from it when plenty out there will help you achieve it, budget allowing of course ?
Having built more 2.1 engines than most, I can say categorically that the 2.1 is better than the 2 litre
#19
^completely agree! Listen to Martynj, he knows his bananas!
A 2.1 is better than a 2.0 ..... but a 2.5 for a sub 450 road car beats them all hands down IMO .... no replaacement for displacement and for on road manners, torque is the new horsepower! :-)
A 2.1 is better than a 2.0 ..... but a 2.5 for a sub 450 road car beats them all hands down IMO .... no replaacement for displacement and for on road manners, torque is the new horsepower! :-)
#20
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Holywell
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally agree, but it does depend on how you drive it, if you like to rev the thing, a 2.1 would be a better choice.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I always say.
For a road car that you don't want to rev to oblivion, forged 2.5, everytime. Put something like an SC46 on it and it'll spool like a VF35 and make 450 + all day long. It's just perfect for the road.
If you want something for the track or that you can rev though the ceiling, 2.1.
For both of the above you'll need the right supporting mods (deffo a 6 speed gearbox) to exploit their potential. You'll be into a 5 figure sum easily.
If you just want something on the cheaper side. A 2.5 with better pistons and HGs with the std turbo and the standard ancillaries just dropped into a classic would go like sh*t off a shovel and make a very nice road car. Can't promise your box would last though!
If you want something that'll get you to even higher levels and provide better response for the larger turbos required to get in the 550+ range than the 2.1, go with the 2.35, but then you're talking SERIOUS money.
For a road car that you don't want to rev to oblivion, forged 2.5, everytime. Put something like an SC46 on it and it'll spool like a VF35 and make 450 + all day long. It's just perfect for the road.
If you want something for the track or that you can rev though the ceiling, 2.1.
For both of the above you'll need the right supporting mods (deffo a 6 speed gearbox) to exploit their potential. You'll be into a 5 figure sum easily.
If you just want something on the cheaper side. A 2.5 with better pistons and HGs with the std turbo and the standard ancillaries just dropped into a classic would go like sh*t off a shovel and make a very nice road car. Can't promise your box would last though!
If you want something that'll get you to even higher levels and provide better response for the larger turbos required to get in the 550+ range than the 2.1, go with the 2.35, but then you're talking SERIOUS money.
Last edited by New_scooby_04; 20 August 2012 at 06:36 PM.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Glad some of you like the 2.5. you here so many guys saying they are no good, the torque on them is ace.
there are a few of you saying that the built 2.5s don't rev, Martin At Alan Jeffrey set the rev limit to 7900 how high do you want them to rev to?
with a 2.5 build you get a lot of area under the graph compared to the 2.1
Here is mine
not the highest power in the world, but its great to drive, and pull all through the revs
Bez
there are a few of you saying that the built 2.5s don't rev, Martin At Alan Jeffrey set the rev limit to 7900 how high do you want them to rev to?
with a 2.5 build you get a lot of area under the graph compared to the 2.1
Here is mine
not the highest power in the world, but its great to drive, and pull all through the revs
Bez
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: plymouth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a my99 uk turbo 2000 classic and have come to the conclusion a newage sti 2.0 is the most cost effective upgrade although I prob won't go more than 350 ish because I don't want the added expense of changing the gearbox
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM