Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

UK STi 8 Scoop.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 08:42 AM
  #1  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Question

Chaps,

In light of the recent disscussions on the TMIC/Scoop/Bonnet shape:

I was having a look at the new STi the other day and noticed that on the new larger scoop, inside there is a piece of plastic which directs the air to the front of the intercooler.....as opposed to the old <MY01 where it directed it to the rear.

So what do you think? Does the incomming air when pointed to the front get forced across the depth of the face of the cooler due to there being a limitation on how much air you can force through the the small frontal area that the scoop directs the air to?

Would a scoop splitter not be a more efficient way of getting air to the whole face?

And finally, PeteC, is the Scoop that you're about to sell a replica of the new STi and if so, does it include this "inner scoop"?

Anyone?

Matt
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 08:53 AM
  #2  
Subzero's Avatar
Subzero
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

It is a splitter just like the ones you can buy/make for the old model.

F
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #3  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

No, it directs all the air coming in to the front of the intercooler as opposed to "splitting" the air coming in to the front and the rear.....

Matt
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 01:34 PM
  #4  
Lunchie's Avatar
Lunchie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Post

I had a look at one the other day and it looked like a splitter to me...?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 02:06 PM
  #5  
Pete Croney's Avatar
Pete Croney
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
From: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Post

Matt I also thought it was a splitter.

Their effectiveness has been discussed to death. I'm staying out of any fresh goes at this one as my views are well known.

What amazes me about the STi is that the skirt below the bonnet is the same as the WRX, so not all of the bigger intercooler is actually in the airflow.

Surely its pointless having a bigger intercooler if the extra area isn't cooled.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 02:33 PM
  #6  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

Well I'll have another look tonight as I'm up near my dealer.....

From what I can remember, the whole of the front edge of the STi intercooler seemed to be "available" for airflow but I'll have a better look later.

Matt
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 03:48 PM
  #7  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

Matt, do you mean sti 7?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Question

Yes, well possibly. I thought the new STi UK was an STi 8/MY02?

Matt
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 04:46 PM
  #9  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

The new shape (ugly) sti be it my 01 or my02 is the sti 7 to my knowledge.

But then you and I both know my knowledge is not to be trusted unless the book I got it from is certified and licensed by the state, government and monarch.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
Lunchie's Avatar
Lunchie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Post

If it was an STi8 it migh p1ss of a lot of people who have just ordered STi7's .

By the time I can afford one it probably will be an STi8. Ho hum.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #11  
NBW's Avatar
NBW
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Wink

Mind you, calling the thread 'STi 8 scoop' sure did get a lot of views......

Cheers
Tim
PS Saving for STI v11
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 09:56 AM
  #12  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

OK,OK, I was wrong (no surprise I hear you say )

I had a "close" look last night at an STi 7 ( ), and the insert I was talking about is actually a scoop splitter like wot Pete said.... (damn )

The reason I thought it wasn't was 'cos it's really dark in there ( ) and the splitter is made of black plastic, AND the gap between the top of the splitter and the underside of the scoop is quite small (and I was looking at it inside the garage both times).

If I recall, the Scoop splitters were deemed a waste of time a while back but perhaps, if Subaru have taken it up, there's more value in it than previously thought?

Matt
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #13  
AJbaseBloke's Avatar
AJbaseBloke
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Post

the BG GT-Bs had them std, then the current did not...boy, the back of the IC was dirty, and the rest of it was obviously not getting much air flow. I put one in from ZeroSports and my buttski meter (large and sensitive ) tells me there is "some" benefit.

Not huge hp, but there nevertheless.

Cheers
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 01:23 PM
  #14  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Talking

I have to agree that the car feels slightly more "urgent" with the splitter but I haven't had a chance to take some meaningful readings (inlet temps) yet which will at least prove that it's doing something (or not)....

Matt
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 02:35 PM
  #15  
Pete Croney's Avatar
Pete Croney
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
From: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Post

Dirtier at the back... Noticeably faster... LOL at you two wind up merchants

I'm STILL not playing this one again
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 02:49 PM
  #16  
SPEN555's Avatar
SPEN555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
From: West Yorkshire
Question

If the splitter allows more air to pass through the intercooler per second what does this mean? Does it mean the car can produce more power at the same boost or does it allow the boost to rise slightly to gain more power?

Try not to get too technical with me as it will go straight above me. LOL!

Damian.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 02:52 PM
  #17  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

It means the efficiency of the intercooler will rise. Meanign the aircharge will be cooler and therefore more dense. This means that per induction stroke of the engine, more oxygen will be available for burning the fuel. More air = more power.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 02:57 PM
  #18  
SPEN555's Avatar
SPEN555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
From: West Yorkshire
Post

Adam,

So increasing the intercooler efficiency will give power increases and the turbo is not part of the equation then? Also then, how does panel filter Induction kits improving their breathing come into this?

Sorry for such numb **** questions.

Damian.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #19  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Wink

Pete,
Dirtier at the back... Noticeably faster... LOL at you two wind up merchants
Who said noticeably faster???? I hope you are not taking the pi$$ Mr Corney ( ) "Slightly more urgent" is some way from "Noticably Faster" in my book.....just like an ITG filter doesn't make you car faster or produce more power but improves the Drivability/throttle response so is better without being very quantifiably so ( )
I'm STILL not playing this one again
Aw - go on - I missed it last time....(or post the old URL?)

Matt

P.S. You still popping in tomorrow?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 04:50 PM
  #20  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Wink

...and now you're gonna tell me that an ITG does give you more power aren't you???

Matt
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2002 | 10:43 PM
  #21  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,471
Likes: 10
Wink

Oi Matt, what about me, where's my apology, I told ya first eh!

I new what it was 'cos I saw one at PE on the RR day last year, I had a real good look, see.

F
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2002 | 09:14 AM
  #22  
mutant_matt's Avatar
mutant_matt
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
From: London
Wink



Matt
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2002 | 10:13 AM
  #23  
Pete Croney's Avatar
Pete Croney
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
From: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Post

Matt

OK, here's my only comment on the subject... and only 'cos you missed it last time

They get dirtier at the back because dirt particles enter with momentum and get thrown to the back. E.G. The dirtiest part of this whole area will be the back of the scoop itself. If dirt deposit = airflow, the air must permeate through the plastic.

Plus... Air will enter the scoop at a far higher rate than it can pass through the intercooler. So the void above the intercooler will be at a raised pressure and this pressure will be equal across the top of the intercooler, from front to back. Again ensuring equal flow.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2002 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
Paul N P's Avatar
Paul N P
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

I agree with Pete and I'm a Physicist by Trade, so that means he is right!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2002 | 10:13 PM
  #25  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,471
Likes: 10
Wink

Pete

So why have Subaru (with all their millions of development money) gone and added one to the STi. Eh, Eh, get out of that one.

F
Te he.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
Nov 18, 2015 07:49 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 AM.