Well it would have done anyway, if Cech had been sent off, and Cudiccinni had come on to face the resultant penalty from cold. So shut ya feckin' whinin'

 

The fact that the ball didn't cross the line, makes the result even more enjoyable.

Get over it! (No pun intended)

 

What does it matter? Chelsea still would have needed to score at some point in the game and they didnt even come close (apart from frankies free kick)

 

Think about it ...??? the ref had to make a split second decision - allow the goal, or award a penalty and risk a goal - send off the keeper- have them play the next 86mins with 10 men plus potential extra time...... oh, and 'if' Chelsea had of won, a red card would have made the keeper inelligiable for the final.

given all the parameters, it wasnt a bad decision after all, even if the ball was '4.3'cm short of being 'fully' across the line....

about as long as this line ---------------



Frank

 

Oh dear

 

I wouldn't worry about it. Chelsea weren't good enough to beat 8 defenders camped on the goal line. Our resident Liverpool fans here at work don't really care if the team can actually play football, just as long as they get a result.

If they get a quick flukey goal (ala Chelski) then I'm sure they'll sit on the lead yet again.

PSV are the 'real' champions in my books and should've finished off Milan last night. Hopefully Milan will remember that they can play footy and finish off Liverpool in the final.

It would be nice to see an English team lift a European Cup again, but Liverpool have some talent yet show very little of it on the field. If someone could teach them how to pass ***** properly without panicing they might get on better.

And would someone please tell them that long ***** to Baros don't fecking work !!! God, sometimes players should be shot (OK, maybe fined) for not being able to pass a ball along the ground.

 

And would someone please tell them that long ***** to Drogba don't fecking work !!! God, sometimes players should be shot (OK, maybe fined) for not being able to pass a ball along the ground.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...192318585&rd=1

Oh Dear!

 

Do you really believe a cg snap shot anyway!

Just look at how far back he had to swing his leg to kick the ball back out

 

I agree Mark... that picture is one of the most inconclusive ones I have seen so far.., AFPMSL

For an accurate assessment if it was a goal would be for the bar to be dead level with the line. Anything from an angle is inconclusive.

 

It wasn't a goal Redkop, get over it.

I liked some of the banners in the crowd, especially the one that read "Romans taxes pay our giros."

 

I got over it at the final whistle. I didn't give a FF whether it was over the line or not and I still don't.

The score at the end was all that mattered... 1 - 0 to Liverpool and they're in CL Final in Istanbul and Chelsea aren't.

 

that computer sim is bollox

look at his left foot.It was next to the line,yet in this sim it was about a foot away,so its utter bollox

the ball went in,all you have to do is look at the defenders left foot

 

Yes the ball went in

 

 

detecting a lot of jealousy Lynne . .

 

I don't care Niall...

We are in Champions League Final

Let 'em all weep.

The linesman and the ref thought it was over the line and gave the goal... that's all that matters

 

Not won anything yet

 

Indeed, but it if we do, we get get to keep the cup.

UEFA rules state that when a club wins the competition five times, or three times on the run, they keep the trophy for good and a new replica is produced.

Reckon Chelsea will ever be able to?

 

Yep in three years time