Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Anybody tried this chip???

Old Jul 1, 2011 | 09:25 PM
  #61  
rogos's Avatar
rogos
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: kent
Default

I used to have an eclipse chip in mine and and the only thing it did'nt do was control boost but was ok with a manual controller, the only downside to this was that i had boost creep in higher gears. So i then changed to a major sarcasm chip and that gave excellent results and it controlled boost electronically using all the factory equipment so no need for a manual boost controller and no more boost creep. Moving forward and in search of a little extra i got hold of a genuine v2 sti ra engine and 7k ecu running with a polarperformance sti ra chip which is now fitted into my car and the performance is even better and it holds boost @ 17psi. Either way there are gains to be had from the three chips i have mentioned but there is definately differences in what is programmed onto them and it is noticeable, the main one being that the eclipse chips obviously have problems with 'boost duty' control because they require the need for a manual controller.

How well did they perform on the rollers:

1. Eclipse chip - 270bhp/230ftlb. afr spot on but boost creep'd and fuel cuts .
2. Major sarcasm chip - 295bhp/251ftlb. everything spot bollock .
3. Polarperformance chip - 307bhp/259ftlb. everything spot bollock .
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2011 | 10:03 PM
  #62  
dj219957's Avatar
dj219957
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 1
From: Staffs
Default

sounds like the eclipse chip doesnt control boost very well atall (which was hinted at earlier in the thread) which can only point to a poor map.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2011 | 10:17 PM
  #63  
eclipse performance's Avatar
eclipse performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Sunderland
Default

That's a good comparison there rogos, it's rare to see such back to back tests with figures to back it up! Although our chip came out on the bottom, it's nice to see that ALL 3 were an IMPROVEMENT and like I've been keep saying, all 3 were completely SAFE in terms of AFR's

Maybe some of our more argumentative friends will finally accept that chipping an ECU is the right thing to do!

Obviously I'll be contacting the programmer of our chips to see if we can work out a solution to the apparent boost control issue.

Last edited by eclipse performance; Jul 1, 2011 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #64  
rogos's Avatar
rogos
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: kent
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
That's a good comparison there rogos, it's rare to see such back to back tests with figures to back it up! Although our chip came out on the bottom, it's nice to see that ALL 3 were an IMPROVEMENT and like I've been keep saying, all 3 were completely SAFE in terms of AFR's

Maybe some of our more argumentative friends will finally accept that chipping an ECU is the right thing to do!

Obviously I'll be contacting the programmer of our chips to see if we can work out a solution to the apparent boost control issue.
I would'nt say your chips are bad because the one i had from you worked fine with a little extra and the afr's were good it just had a qwirk with the boost so to speak. Oh and all the figures i quoted were from surrey rolling road

Last edited by rogos; Jul 2, 2011 at 08:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 07:50 AM
  #65  
eclipse performance's Avatar
eclipse performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Sunderland
Default

Thanks rogos. I guess it also puts to bed the theory that we are all copying each others software too, as clearly the ones you tried are all different (although your polar chip was in a better spec engine so might not have given such extra bhp with your old engine)

Im sure with a bit more investigation we will get to the bottom of this problem with the boost.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #66  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
Maybe some of our more argumentative friends will finally accept that chipping an ECU is the right thing to do!
Doubt it.

<< Not remapped, not chipped standard, DET free ecu.

Oh and early imports don't need 100 RON fuel, it wasn't available in Japan back then.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #67  
P1Drifter's Avatar
P1Drifter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: Devon
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
Obviously I'll be contacting the programmer of our chips to see if we can work out a solution to the apparent boost control issue.
Good luck on that one !
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 10:21 AM
  #68  
bigsinky's Avatar
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
From: Sunny BELFAST
Default

but these chips give you so much bang for your buck
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #69  
stira2's Avatar
stira2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
Im sure with a bit more investigation we will get to the bottom of this problem with the boost.
Did you manage to sort this problem out?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #70  
Scott.T's Avatar
Scott.T
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 1
From: East Sussex
Default

Just stumbled across this thread searching for something else....some of the banter/comments/apparent knowledge made me laugh.

LOL....
Scott.T.....(previously trading as Polar Performance !!!).
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2013 | 10:40 AM
  #71  
steviechi's Avatar
steviechi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
Hi guys. I just saw this thread about our chips and thought Id throw in some info...

The software in the chip is based on Prodrive maps and is tuned for a car running a TD05 Turbo, Decat exhauaust & pannel filter, using UK fuel. So if your car is to that spec you will see the best gains. Obviously there are many different varients & specs, however you will still see an improvement with the chip fitted. It also allows you to manually adjust the boost higher without hitting fuel cut.

The only issue we hear about is sometimes Z4 ECU's dont like the chip. When we have fitted them here in the workshop they work fine, but we have had a few customers who have fitted it themselves who have reported some running issues.

We do offer a complete 100% satisfaction guarentee with them, so if you are not satisfied you can return he chip for a full refund!

To date we have sold over 500 chips, and only had around 5 or 6 issues, all with Z4 ECU's.
Originally Posted by eclipse performance
Bl@@dy IPhone stalled half way through sending it so I thought it hadn't worked!

Westy, I dont know the torque figures off the top of my head so I wont guess, I'll see if I can dig out any power graphs when I get into work tomorrow.

The price, including postage is £51.98.

You can find more info here. Theres also some genuine feedback there from a recent happy customer.

At least 1 happy customer from 500 - thats quite good going... think it says enough
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
Aug 5, 2018 07:02 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
madmover
Member's Gallery
4
Sep 28, 2015 10:46 AM
S600HBY
Subaru Parts
0
Sep 25, 2015 09:46 AM
ALi-B
Computer & Technology Related
0
Sep 14, 2015 07:49 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.