[quote=99greenwagon;9044849]Lmao

 

[QUOTE=AmandaHenderson;9044865],good luck with your motor u sexy beast!

 

 

 

well I reckon some pics of the girls figure could be in order personally .... sorry did I say figure? I meant figureS obviously

 

i hope to god u aint a hair dresser

 

But on the same count, how can you expect us to believe motorscopes inflated figures, from a rolling road that is supposed to be maintained really well yet the last rolling road day that was held at the site, had everybody coming away with insane AFR readings that went off the scale ?

Totally crazy AFR readings that were fine when checked by 3rd partys ?

The only thing they are maintaining, is a constant stream of people who want XXX BHP


Not sure what the delay is, but as far as i am aware Gunther has bought some Dyno Dynamic rollers, they are just not fitted into the new site yet? and as you may be aware, they are supposed to be pretty good on the reliability scale regards uniform output, but i bet people will still complain about them

 

yeah i heard a few people grumble about their AFR's showing too rich but mine were pretty much identical to my previous run there just over a year ago. you do realise though that the AFR readings they take are purely there as a safety factor and do not influence the power calculations.

no doubt about the dyno dynamics rollers. they are known as being one of the best so would be interesting to see a comparison. although saying that, if someone is wanting to see the gains from fitting a particular mod then they should really re-use the dyno their car was last on.

however,...... as has just been stated a few posts ago, this is not meant to be a figures thread.

now forget dynos and trying to sound like ya know it all and start to admire the fit lass and fit car

unless ofcourse scoobys dont do it for ya anymore now that you aint got one, in which case go play on the rover forum

 

Scoobys still do it for me, but only the fast/real ones with a turbo, the snidey wannabes that are actually slower then my Rover (now thats a ****ing insult lmfao!) , don't really do anything for me at all, not surprising really

 

Codswallop.
Subaru do not under estimate at all, in fact they have been rather guilty of over playing their hand in recent incarnations. Remember the PPP debarkle and the supposed 305bhp?
They have also been quite happy to sit back and let word of mouth and rumour run its course, such as the reputed 350bhp from a 22b and the 300 bhp from the late classic STIs.

As for getting 50bhp from a decat, oh please, pull the other one.
I'm by no means a tuner, at best a keen amatuer but I've been playing with my own imprezas for about 7 years now.
I remember back in the day when people like myself, Floyd, Pickle et all were all chasing a magical 300bhp.
a decat on its own at best will be looking at 15 bhp, this is proven by the fact that the original stage 1 tune back in the day was an uprated panel filter, a full decat and a dawes set to 1.15bar. On average this netted 255bhp.

I have no gripe with you or your company but to tell people what you have is misleading and irresponsible imo.

 

*cough* no ***** = FAIL

 

double post, whoops.

 

Damn remember the days when 300bhp was a mystical figure that you could not get past without the engine blowing up

I remember Rich from jap innovations doing 350 bhp at well lane and every body was stunned, Scoobynet was crazy with "shes gonna blow" messages


As far as i know YellowPeril does not own a company, i don't think he is affiliated with anything scooby related

He just needs a little guidance

I can remember when TTS thought my car must be around 330bhp (in the beguining of the club) as it was fast as hell compared with everybody elses, we stick it on the rollers and it puts out 280bhp and 260lbft
That says it all!

 

ah Well Lane, you didn;t mention this thread included figures from Well Lane

 

Think we can safely say its not the fastest on here by a long shot, but its CERTAINLY not the slowest by a hell of a long shot!!!!

and by the way....... my mam's hard than you mam!

 

not the best looking face iv seen on here aswell by a hell of a LONG shot!!!

 

okay, i'll bite. what i say is not misleading and not irresponsible at all. please feel free to view page 104 onwards of the current total impreza magazine and take note of the modifications fitted to the cars and their power outputs. everyone is entitled to their opinion and it is mine that subaru do understate the power outputs. times change and its a lot easier to extract power from the later cars than the early ones. mine doesnt have a turbo but ive managed to up power by 50% just with an exhaust system, inake and increased fuel pressure. well from what subaru say the original power was anyway . micky, my car might not have a turbo but im damn sure i could give you a run for your money so dont be saying its slow.

now, can you guys stop hijacking the thread

 

Christ, 8 pages?!?!

 

this thread it pointless, who cares a blonde girl drives a scooby put your d*cks back in your pants

 

Pmsl!! You cant put ya d*ck back in ya pants cos its on ya head

If its that pointless........say off it!!

 

You're probably a bloke with a fetiche for lingerie.

 

It depends on what kind of lingerie, only the expensive stuff

 

I must be a woman.............. I like expensive things

 

I doubt it to be honest, i have more grunt and i believe a lighter car .......

A stock zs180 has 177bhp and 177ish lbft


Your modded sport has according to the motorscope rollers 170bhp and 150lbft.


My car is not stock either

I consider my current car slow, so yours must be positively snail like

 

i have just spent 10mins reading this and still no pics,should have gone straight to page 8,lol,

 

Just out of curiosity what car do you have?

 

tbh i wouldnt waste my time getting my d*ck out over you

 

Now that is a shame I could do with a really good laugh

 

look in mirror and you'll get one or a rolling road print out

 

the only thing ill see in my mirror is your car!