Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

bmw 330d

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #31  
mgcvk's Avatar
mgcvk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 9
Default

The BMW oil burners are all about mid range torque and scoobs are all about acceleration from a standing start and boosting out of corners. If you are doing about 70mph and even drop a cog in an impreza you are going to be hard pressed to out accelerate a powerful oil burner. Imprezas aren't that fast when moving after the initial burst of acceleration. Things may be different at around 400-500bhp but at around 300bhp and below thats my experience.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #32  
RRH's Avatar
RRH
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
From: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Default

I did, but the pace of that thing was phenominal.

I was already pressing on up the hill when it came up behind me, dropped to 4th and pulled over as soon as I was able, whilst keeping it planted, to see what he had, and he just sailed past at a hell of a rate.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #33  
mgcvk's Avatar
mgcvk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 9
Default

Torque.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #34  
RRH's Avatar
RRH
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
From: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Default

Originally Posted by mgcvk
Torque.
yep
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #35  
Spooky Mulder's Avatar
Spooky Mulder
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: York
Default

Originally Posted by Mikkel
You need to drop a cog every now and then mate. I'm aware the Impreza is not the fastest car in the world as some on here think but a 350/350 STI should not be left standing by a loaded 535d.
By the time you have changed down the BMW will have outflanked you.

Remember masses of torque and an auto box mapped to keep the engine right at the peak torque level to maximise acceleration, especially going up hill.

Having owned both (STi, Spec C) and BMW 330 and 530 I am pretty sure that while the Spec C will be far faster around Cadwell, on real roads there is much less in it.

As for the 335/535 they are simply awesome. I wouldn't even bother with the petrol cars.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #36  
hhh1234's Avatar
hhh1234
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: N.IRELAND
Default

torque is the winner in the end.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:44 PM
  #37  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

It's a diesel FFS ... not yet good enough to beat a like for like petrol engined car eg 2 litre vs 2 litre etc. They are catching up though

Might it have been a 335d?

TX.

PS

My old Spec C was 375/375 & could take on & thrash ANY diesel at any revs

Last edited by Terminator X; Feb 11, 2009 at 11:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #38  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

Like VBH 330d was keeping up with an M3 on the track on fifth gear FFS. Get a grip 330d have good mid range torque but they are not high performance cars.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #39  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

Originally Posted by hhh1234
torque is the winner in the end.
Torque is the winner but diesels only manage it for a 2000rpm range, where as petrol manages it for as much as a 6000rpm range. The petrol car might not have as much but it has it more of the time. Honda civic type r driven properly would beat a 330d. Formular 1 cars don't have alot of torque.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:14 AM
  #40  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

Some of you guys want to go out in a well sorted Turbo Diesel as there is a lot of rubbish on here about 2000rpm powerbands and the like.

We regularly take some oil burners to the ring and the new BMW's are amazing, as are some of the later Mercedes Diesels.

Remember, BHP is a fictional figure and could easily be bananas, Torque is the rotational force that moves your car and teh more of it you have the faster the car. Its all about area under the graph, not how high the peak climbs.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #41  
GazTheHat's Avatar
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
From: 392/361 MY04 STi
Default

Originally Posted by damandblast
Dept-manager at work has a new Skoda fabia VRS which has just been chipped and it's unreal once it's going...380 torque in such a small car at the moment and it will soon be pushing 260bhp/480torque once his miltek exhaust system is on and some more minor work has been done. Would leave my scoobie for dead after 1st gear
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #42  
Paul3446's Avatar
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Default

Are F1 cars Torquey?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #43  
330dan's Avatar
330dan
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by martwrxsl
Like VBH 330d was keeping up with an M3 on the track on fifth gear FFS. Get a grip 330d have good mid range torque but they are not high performance cars.
well whats your definition of high performance? - 330d's have more torque than scoobs, more bhp than some scoobs, one thrashed the OP and numerous other people on these threads, VBH uses one on track days and beats other 'high performance' cars, people on this thread have said they are better out of twisties and on a drag strip, they are being made to rev higher and pull through a greater range of revs, they can be tuned up and modified.....tell me where they are not high performance!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:12 AM
  #44  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Are F1 cars Torquey?
Not really. An F1 car, being a race car needs maximum work done at any time so instead of looking for tractability that is low end torque, they are designed to make use of revs to generate a lot of horsepower over a wide powerband instead. (HorsePower = Work Done)

An engine generating 650bhp at 18000rpm is only actually making 190ftlb of torque at peak power.

By Comparison, A Subaru making 650bhp at 8000rpm has 426ftlb of torque at peak power.


Torque = (HPx5252) / RPM
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #45  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

Originally Posted by 330dan
well whats your definition of high performance? - 330d's have more torque than scoobs, more bhp than some scoobs, one thrashed the OP and numerous other people on these threads, VBH uses one on track days and beats other 'high performance' cars, people on this thread have said they are better out of twisties and on a drag strip, they are being made to rev higher and pull through a greater range of revs, they can be tuned up and modified.....tell me where they are not high performance!
I drive fast cars every day of my life. Its part of my job, and in my opinion you have a fast car mate. Don't let the anti diesel pundits get you down, its an argument you will never win on a keyboard because your outnumbered, but you can hunt them down one at a time on the A roads. lol

Last edited by Evolution Stu; Feb 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #46  
Paul3446's Avatar
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Default

So if speed is all about torque and not horsepower, why aren't F1 cars lower powered and torquey.

I suspect the people saying that their 350hp monsters that have been left for dead by 330Ds are simply in the wrong gear.

I'm not arguing that 330Ds can't keep up with Imprezas, but left for dead? If you floor a 350hp Impreza in 3rd gear at 70mph, there's not much on the road that will leave you for dead. And certainly not a 330D.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #47  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
So if speed is all about torque and not horsepower, why aren't F1 cars lower powered and torquey.
See my answer above.

Originally Posted by Paul3446
If you floor a 350hp Impreza in 3rd gear at 70mph, there's not much on the road that will leave you for dead. And certainly not a 330D.
Lets pin down what we are going to call; "left for dead" and then we can arrange a suitable showdown.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #48  
T123VOR's Avatar
T123VOR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Welcome home; Keano, Defoe & Chimmy...
Default

I have both a 330d (albeit MSport touring so a bit heavier) and an STI and from my experience my scoob would leave my BM behind - but, as above, midrange (as with most diesels) it would compete.
If you're caught in the wrong gear going up a hill and the diesel was at optimum torque I reckon you could be left behind (until you caught up again!)
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:28 AM
  #49  
Paul3446's Avatar
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Default

Exactly. If you're caught in the wrong gear, otherwise us Subaru drivers can relax again.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #50  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

Originally Posted by T123VOR
I have both a 330d (albeit MSport touring so a bit heavier) and an STI and from my experience my scoob would leave my BM behind - but, as above, midrange (as with most diesels) it would compete.
If you're caught in the wrong gear going up a hill and the diesel was at optimum torque I reckon you could be left behind (until you caught up again!)
Standard or properly remapped? Standard ones arent particularly fast, we are talking about optimised ones here, well, at least I am.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #51  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

Next you'll be telling me that a 535d is quicker than an m5, because it's got more torque. the spread of torque over a greater range is where you get your ultimate performance. diesels don't have that range like petrols, end of story.

I'd call the new RS6 a performance car. 485lbs/ft from 1,000-6,000rpm or there abouts. diesels are great at what they do but a 330d mapped/standard is not going to leave a standard bugeye for dead.



I
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #52  
ReggieMY99's Avatar
ReggieMY99
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default

My experience is that you always get in on boost before its too late, if you wait for the beamer to pass you and then go on boost, the bmw already has the momentum and its bye bye or you are going to struggle keeping up, remember these cars were built for autobahn race, imprezas are a different kettle of car, cant really compare them, awd against rwd, the beamer can put all its power to the ground

playing with an m5 some months ago, from standing starts and its too heavy although it got loads of bhp so its goodbye bmw until we get up at silly speeds, did him 4 times and then he would have no more of it, im running 280 approx
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #53  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

Originally Posted by ReggieMY99
My experience is that you always get in on boost before its too late, if you wait for the beamer to pass you and then go on boost, the bmw already has the momentum and its bye bye or you are going to struggle keeping up, remember these cars were built for autobahn race, imprezas are a different kettle of car, cant really compare them, awd against rwd, the beamer can put all its power to the ground

playing with an m5 some months ago, from standing starts and its too heavy although it got loads of bhp so its goodbye bmw until we get up at silly speeds, did him 4 times and then he would have no more of it, im running 280 approx
He was playing with you. A new 500+bhp M5 would destroy an impreza with 280bhp at anything past 20mph. Now that would be a better comparision of left for dead than the OP.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #54  
Spooky Mulder's Avatar
Spooky Mulder
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: York
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Exactly. If you're caught in the wrong gear, otherwise us Subaru drivers can relax again.
...but in the 'real' world the BMW auto diesel is always at optimum torque. By the time you had changed down and got on boost the BMW has passed you.

The reason why the F1 car does not need so much torque is that it does not need to accelerate out of corners as downforce (enabling lateral 4g) means it does not need to slow as much. It means that the F1 can stay in its peak power band.

They are also very light. Neither that level of downforce or lightness is very feasible on the road.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #55  
chrispy200+'s Avatar
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 1
From: Aldershot
Default

Not going to take anything away from the diesel bmw's, mate had a 535d which had been chipped and another mate that had a evo6 tme couldn't keep up with him pretty much anywhere, to be fair though the one in the 535d used to race caterhams and is a pretty good driver. Also if you read pistonheads there is nothing that can keep up with a chipped 335d.
As for the 5th gear show, surely as she is a pretty good driver that was helping a lot, as soon as they got onto a straight she said she couldn't get past the m3, was making most of the time up on the corners
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #56  
Evolution Stu's Avatar
Evolution Stu
Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
From: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Default

LOL. Always the same arguments in these topics... so pointless, yet fun.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #57  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ Internet Brands
LOL. Always the same arguments in these topics... so pointless, yet fun.


In the other 330d thread (in other marque) I was going to explain the full reason why BHP figures don't look good on engines with low rev limits (using a Bentley Arnage T for an example).

But then I thought nobody would understand or try to argue fact and try to prove that peak BHP means everything, so I thought f** it and didn't bother
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #58  
ReggieMY99's Avatar
ReggieMY99
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReggieMY99
My experience is that you always get in on boost before its too late, if you wait for the beamer to pass you and then go on boost, the bmw already has the momentum and its bye bye or you are going to struggle keeping up, remember these cars were built for autobahn race, imprezas are a different kettle of car, cant really compare them, awd against rwd, the beamer can put all its power to the ground

playing with an m5 some months ago, from standing starts and its too heavy although it got loads of bhp so its goodbye bmw until we get up at silly speeds, did him 4 times and then he would have no more of it, im running 280 approx


He was playing with you. A new 500+bhp M5 would destroy an impreza with 280bhp at anything past 20mph. Now that would be a better comparision of left for dead than the OP.

so true, unfortunately you didnt care to read my post, 20 mph is hardly a standing start is it

big M5 he has 3 settings and he tried them all, always a car length in front of him, and he wasnt trying you say.. well why would he undertake in the buslane to get next to me at the lights for the first run he got whooped and he didnt like it at all, the fourth time i waved to him when he was next to me, didnt look too glad always a car length infront of him

the point was standing starts and and imprezas
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #59  
330dan's Avatar
330dan
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by martwrxsl
Next you'll be telling me that a 535d is quicker than an m5, because it's got more torque. the spread of torque over a greater range is where you get your ultimate performance. diesels don't have that range like petrols, end of story.

ok well im not going to start arguing this point aswell but as someone has already explained a 535d is faster than an m5 30 - 70 and thats quite a spread of torque.

I'd call the new RS6 a performance car. 485lbs/ft from 1,000-6,000rpm or there abouts. diesels are great at what they do but a 330d mapped/standard is not going to leave a standard bugeye for dead.


No - a mapped 330d really is going to leave a standard bugeye for dead...


I
...

Last edited by 330dan; Feb 12, 2009 at 02:17 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #60  
jonny_693's Avatar
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 1
From: Hudds
Default

Is there much in it between a 330d and a 530d? A 5 must weigh a good 300kilos more?
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.