Were they really?

I take it you rep'd yourself with various usernames then

 

On the quiet, I'm quite sad to see it go. I'd just sneaked past the 50 mark despite a volley of early reds.

 

Incorrect. It was illuminating to find out that so many people agree with some of the things I say.

 

Now what will we moan about?

 

You leaving us then??

 

 

I Think a lot of people would agree with with some of the things you say.

It's just the way you say it you ******* retarded ********

 

They were from the asylum

 

Trolls......

 

And PSLewis

 

Very valid points there

It takes a few mouse clicks to enable the ability for everyone to see who is leaving reputation. There isn't an option to show only who left neg rep, but I don't see a problem in seeing who left good/bad rep anyway.

The options regarding how the reputation power is calulated could also have been tweaked to keep things at a sensible option.

As for dealing with those whose reputation becomes negative, again, a "promotion" that would automatically move users to another, more restrictive, usergroup if they had ? -1 reputation is very very simple to setup.

Another step would be to have newbies unable to give out reputation until they become regular users. This can also be done via a "promotion", criteria being reputation points, time registered and number of posts, and whether it's less than, or equal or greater than any or all of those criteria.

If a troll re-registers and it's obvious they are a troll neg rep them, they hit the -1 limit and are banned/can't post/whatever you set the permissions on the group to allow.

That's not a perfect system, there are some flaws, but it would at least have an automatic element to it, which was lacking in what was set up.

I am curious to know what, if anything will be put in the place of reputation.

 

Im disapointed to see it go actually. Id just got by the 50 mark too.

 

Thanks for the feedback-

add 'jasey' to the list of people I wound up.

 

Quite the reverse - I like almost all of you're posts

 

https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...lliterati.html

 

Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead. About time too.

That's going to screw a few people's tiny meaningless existences up on here.


PMSL

 

The irony is almost palpable

 

amazing how abusive the place has become now the rep points have gone

the people who knew they were hated, will still be gutted now matter how much they prance about thinking they have "won"

LOL

 

there is a flaw in your suggestions.................if you could see who neg repped you then you would just do it back and neg rep them as well. the system would still end up in the bin

 

It works ok on Ebay.....

 

Just getting back to as it was - Almost as good as the CWE days

 

but you can only ever leave one feedback per item, and if someone gives you a bad rep for the wrong reason you can get ebay to sort it out

 

As said, there are some flaws there. I gave negative reputation to someone if I saw them being troll like or abusive. I didn't give it just for the sake of it, or to be petty.

Interesting to note that as yet there hasn't been any feedback from Shaun/Simon as to what they thought of the system and what, if anything they are going to do to deal with the trolls, which was, I think, one of the reasons for enabling the reputation system.

 

but if someone knew it was you that neg repped them they would do it back out of spite....

i dont think there was ever anyway it would have worked, and now we have an even bigger problem...........shed loads of new trolls

i think simon/shauns silence speaks volumes

 

I didnt bother returning neg reps. Id return a pos rep though. Didnt see the point in neg repping someone just out of spite although 2 certain users on here did get bad rep from me whenever possible

Always had it signed off aswell.

 

i am going to miss you giving me one

 

The thing that screwed it was it's abuse by people that ought to know better. Shark Man made a prudent observation early doors...

https://www.scoobynet.com/6369423-post40.html

 

Except his conclusion was proved to be incorrect

 

I'll take that as a compliment, dont get many of them on here

 

By whom and where's the incrovertible evidence?