Driving a SORN'd Vehicle - Implications
19 November 2005, 01:22 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thankyou Les; Im fighting a rearguard against 'what people think they know'... This would also include: 'you cant undertake'; yes you can, and: 'if your car isnt taxed you arent insured' yes it is!
Simon
Simon
19 November 2005, 10:02 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Made it back without incident. Loads of feds on the M1 today but luckily the were targetting chavs and hoodies
TONY
TONY
20 November 2005, 10:53 AM
#33
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by GC8
Im not really sure how to reply to that. Youre arguing that youre correct based on what happened, but its apparent that you were prosecuted when you hadnt broken the law.
The lesson to be learnt there; is that under no circumstances do you speak under caution and always elect to go for jury trial.
Simon
The lesson to be learnt there; is that under no circumstances do you speak under caution and always elect to go for jury trial.
Simon
20 November 2005, 10:56 AM
#34
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by GC8
'if your car isnt taxed you arent insured' yes it is!
Simon
Simon
Even with our legal system as corrupted as it is by NL's interference, your insurance company (as yet) cannot judge you on the basis of your being in debt to the Inland Revenue/Customs & Excise.
20 November 2005, 05:13 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: In the garage or in bed
Posts: 7,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This SORN crap is a pain in the **** for us as I have to have a mot on the rally car but it doesn't have to be taxed for single venue rallying so every so every "how ever long it is" we get the sorn paperwork in the post to renew 
It's all a load of bollox to screw around with the motorist because we all know it keeps all the illegal cars off the road
It's all a load of bollox to screw around with the motorist
because we all know it keeps all the illegal cars off the road
20 November 2005, 09:36 PM
#36
If a car driver has 3rd party insurance only ,which is all that is required by law then the vehicle actually isnt insured when its parked as it is not being driven.
As you or your mate can drive a vehicle under the 3rd party insurance of your own policy how do the police ascertain whether the said vehicle is insured or not?
I just dont see how this is going to work.
As you or your mate can drive a vehicle under the 3rd party insurance of your own policy how do the police ascertain whether the said vehicle is insured or not?
I just dont see how this is going to work.
20 November 2005, 10:07 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Llandudno
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
They informed me that if I moved the car within 24hrs I could go down to the station, receive a police caution and thatr would be the end of it. No problem, moved the car, got the caution, carried on with my life. Four months later I received a registered letter saying that a date for my magistrates court appearance, with respect to driving a car whilst un-inisured, had been set for the following week
Originally Posted by Beastie
If a car driver has 3rd party insurance only ,which is all that is required by law then the vehicle actually isnt insured when its parked as it is not being driven.
As you or your mate can drive a vehicle under the 3rd party insurance of your own policy how do the police ascertain whether the said vehicle is insured or not?
I just dont see how this is going to work.
As you or your mate can drive a vehicle under the 3rd party insurance of your own policy how do the police ascertain whether the said vehicle is insured or not?
I just dont see how this is going to work.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
