Notices
Projects For Serious DIY Car Projects

New Engine / DriveTrain Project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #301  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

I thought of that !
But I assume (again ) that they foul when fitted, with engine in position.

Andy
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #302  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Post

So the thing you would be welding back in place would allow clearance still?

Be nicer to be able to lift engine in and out without removing headers.. but then if it has to come out then mostlikely the headers will have to come off anyway..

Fuzz you must be right..

Perhaps we should wait for David to fill up in..

Simon
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 09:58 PM
  #303  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Post

shift the engine over to one side

Andy
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #304  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

no offence you two.. but look at the fooking picures.. how the **** am I going to fit them after.. especially as there is external wastegate pipework and also a bracket to be fitted yet..

tsk tsk tsk..

they foul the left side of the subframe.. will cut out curve and weld box section in hopefully

David
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #305  
hypoluxa's Avatar
hypoluxa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Exclamation

David,

Those headers will not work, I'm just off out but I'll explain later.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #306  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #307  
hypoluxa's Avatar
hypoluxa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Post

"Don't work" was perhaps a little strong

I use the same manifold. The joints expand and bleed off pressure, greatly effecting spool up. You can hear them blowing at idle. I don't get 1bar until over 4000rpm (and that's in 5th) - p20 EH, and don't hit peak boost until over 100mph. LOL. Not very practical. They are jigged for a STI7, hence a few clearance issues.

However it's not all bad news, once a certain pressure (and temp) is achieved they appear to stop expanding and then they do produce the goods. IIRC max duty cycle was increased from 83 to 95% (fuel pressure was also upped a little more) to hit the same wideband AFR.

I'm going to try fitting stronger springs and a smattering of lockwire - It may end in tears though
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 07:10 PM
  #308  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

I think any sort of springs are to be avoided. Curved or slotted tie bars are required IMHO.

Back pressure will blow the thing apart.

Hypoluxa, I thought you meant it would be no good for power, which is what David thought too I believe.

Paul
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #309  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

hypoluxa, are you sure yours are the same???

Slip joints are very good on them, and when I spoke to paul iirc (at tony law) they werent jigged for an sti 7 (not that it matters..) if slip joints blow then Ill weld the ******* up..

Think im joking?? Try Me

David
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #310  
hypoluxa's Avatar
hypoluxa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Post

Yes David they are the same. I had one of the first. Had to remove the EGT boss from the uppipe (off 3&4) for it to fit (STi5). I spoke to Paul about this, and that's when he mentioned the STi7. I have not spoken to him regarding the pressure loss though.

You will have to do something regarding the joints, end off. Judging by the amount they expand they would probably crack within a matter of minutes if welded. Apart from the expansion arrangement they are of very good design.

Sorry to be alarmist on the power front btw
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 08:08 PM
  #311  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Question

David

My concern was the material ? I think mild steel (if that's what they are) will have a fatigue issue, cycling at 900+ degC ?
Paul, your a material person what do you think ?

Andy
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #312  
ustolemyname??stevieturbo's Avatar
ustolemyname??stevieturbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Post

Id hav thought the heat thing would have been the only issue. I have heard of a manifold actually melt before ( although it was some years ago, and it was made of box section...lol ) Im sure that it wasnt running very efficiently either.
But as we all know, these things do get hot.
I agree tho, that if they leak, weld em up. Mild steel expands less than stainless, so if a stainless one can stay together with no expansion joints, then I dont think mild steel should have any problems.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 09:34 PM
  #313  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Post

tsk tsk tsk..
Sorry it was a boring evening.. had to find a thread to reply too..

Simon
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 11:32 PM
  #314  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Post

The joints on this manifold are not single sleeved, they are double sleeved if you know what i mean, and they a bloody tight, and very well made IMO.

I would be surprised if they leak and did not work, given that they are an "improved design" on a certain set of headers we all(well most of us) know.

Steven
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:04 AM
  #315  
hypoluxa's Avatar
hypoluxa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Post

Which headers are you refering to Steven?

Oh and prepare yourself for a surprise
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 03:39 AM
  #316  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

wooosh..


something just went over my head..



I can see me and stevie getting on, grinder and welder if that doesnt fix it then.. hmm we are both stuck :d

**** theory.. tie bar means **** need pics or simple expliantions.

hypoluxa where about do you live??

David
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 09:28 AM
  #317  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Post

i was referring to Davids headers.

Given that these are custom made, and supposedly one off design.... ahh well, i'll shut up, easier

Steven
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 09:45 AM
  #318  
Tim W's Avatar
Tim W
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Wink

Back in the dim and distant past (ie when I hated all modern cars and would only srive classics) I knee a company who would not use staiinless at all for exhausts. They used a particularly good grade of mild steel (which one I can't remember) which barely suffered corrosion.

Stainless I have been told isn't ideal for manifolds because it tends to expand more and is prone to fatigue cracking when it goes through enough heat cycles...mild steel on the other hand doesn't suffer the heat cycling issues to the same degree
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 11:31 AM
  #319  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

tim this is also what I was told and are you pissed?

Anyway they dont fit on the car.. once I have made the car fit the exhaust time will tell
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:55 PM
  #320  
LEGACYTURBS's Avatar
LEGACYTURBS
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Post

'Think im joking?? Try Me'


Classic Wallis, just classic...
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #321  
hypoluxa's Avatar
hypoluxa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Post

Near Derby David.

Most, if not all aftermarket manifolds (with slip joints) use tie bars (Maxim, Jun, HKS etc)
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #322  
ustolemyname??stevieturbo's Avatar
ustolemyname??stevieturbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Post

If it leaks, weld the ****** up. Whats the worst that can happen ??, it will blow a gasket.
Need I say more. They all seem to blow gaskets anyway. Id say the mild steel versions will be much better in this respect.
As for scaling or whatever with the heat. I wouldnt worry at all. Ive used botched together manifolds for ages. I havent had bits falling of them yet. They stay very clean.
I just use black iron welding bends, for plumbing/gas. Good thick wall stuff.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 09:20 PM
  #323  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Post

David may i suggest you use my semi famous phrase of FIIBR

Works for me
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 10:24 PM
  #324  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Angry

would someone please fix this stupid BB software it's very annoying.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 09:22 AM
  #325  
Tim W's Avatar
Tim W
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Cool

David, I was/am completely sober just wasn't watching what I was typing, or doing an Adam as it's known in the trade

(you won't beleive the number of mistakes I made in this message!)
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:07 PM
  #326  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

steven

off in the garage to make the car fit around the exhaust now..

Tim, I would (as you mentioned adam )

David
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #327  
vulnax999's Avatar
vulnax999
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 11
Lightbulb

David

Have you got your proper engine back yet? Or are you trying to fit the headers around the spare engine? Would there be any dimension differences between the two engines that would help?

Is chopping the subframe and welding bits in a safe way to get it to fit, or is modding the header pipes better?

Are you on target for TOTB ?

Keep the report and picies going...makes good reading.

Neil.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #328  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

No proper engine as yet... only dimension changes will be gasket thickness.. etc.. matter of mm's

Chopping subframe is easiest way..

No really on target for totb.. but will try my best..

anyway..

Update.. will post pics tonight..

Engine is in and does fit.. Powersteering pipes into rack however do not.. engine is bolted to box to check allignment etc..

Exhaust sits on subframe so will alter by about 7mm to eliminate noise (most likely to sound like aps pipework..) engine will not shove over enough.. I also prefer my engine to sit in the centre!

Andy made flange for PS pump at weekend and enlarged existing one to about 10 / 11mm

all spacers are now done and two are instant gasket'ed together :O

<Shut it> Do you know how much four inlet manifold gaskets cost, let alone six. </shut it>

David
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #329  
chiark's Avatar
chiark
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 13,735
Likes: 0
Post

let alone six
You're putting a 6 cylinder in there? ****!

Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #330  
vulnax999's Avatar
vulnax999
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 11
Cool

Hmmm

Manifold - gasket - spacer - gasket - head ... repeat for other bank. So 4 gaskets used.

Where would 6 gaskets come in? If there were 3 spacers ... but then just instant gasket them as mentioned above?


Arghh, obvious.... if using 2 spacers with a gasket between each one... gotcha!


Neil
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.