Saturday was a record day for wind energy.
#3
Scooby Regular
Yeah great news. So what about the other 364 days? There was some flowery dress wearing idiot on the radio celebrating the fact that wind generated more power than nuclear for the first time ever and then used the argument to shut down more coal and gas fuelled power stations, probably the nuclear ones too, but I didn't hear that bit as I'd smashed the radio up by that point.
How difficult is it to understand that we need alternatives for when the wind isn't blowing enough to generate anything like what would be a useful contribution towards the UK's energy needs?
How difficult is it to understand that we need alternatives for when the wind isn't blowing enough to generate anything like what would be a useful contribution towards the UK's energy needs?
Trending Topics
#11
Scooby Regular
#14
Scooby Regular
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Take the politics out of the equation and energy generation is simple.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much detail do you want and what's the base scenario? I.e. do EU CO2 regs matter?
As a side however, you would aim to have capacity to cover your max annual load (plus some redundancy) using larger plants such as goal/gas/nuclear. With something like pumped storage or smaller gas plants to cover any fast transients.
thing is energy policy is one of the more sensible things you'll find on UKIPs manifesto.
As a side however, you would aim to have capacity to cover your max annual load (plus some redundancy) using larger plants such as goal/gas/nuclear. With something like pumped storage or smaller gas plants to cover any fast transients.
thing is energy policy is one of the more sensible things you'll find on UKIPs manifesto.
#23
Scooby Regular
some regard to "green" issues - however you choose to interpret that -- CO2 targets!! possibly
I have no fixed view btw - I suspect the info (pro or con a particular technology) I get is tainted by some agenda or another
it is difficult to make an informed decision
I do think the wind power milestone in the OP is a good news - whatever negative spin the rabid anti-green lobby may try and put on it
#24
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
This is such a non-story to me.
On one day with a bit of wind, they've finally done their job.....meanwhile during the times they weren't be it due to weather or nobody buying energy from them (as of course, with it being more expensive, energy retailers will only buy it if they are forced to by green levys), all the other not-so-green power stations have been chugging away day in day out meeting our needs.
Bar the one that caught fire. Even then it was blown out of proportion, it going off line was never an issue...and only four cooling of the thirty towers were damaged.
I'm not against renewables, but I really think wind farms are not the answer. Solar, tidle, hydroelectric storage (pumped reservoirs)....and nuclear needs more focus IMO
On one day with a bit of wind, they've finally done their job.....meanwhile during the times they weren't be it due to weather or nobody buying energy from them (as of course, with it being more expensive, energy retailers will only buy it if they are forced to by green levys), all the other not-so-green power stations have been chugging away day in day out meeting our needs.
Bar the one that caught fire. Even then it was blown out of proportion, it going off line was never an issue...and only four cooling of the thirty towers were damaged.
I'm not against renewables, but I really think wind farms are not the answer. Solar, tidle, hydroelectric storage (pumped reservoirs)....and nuclear needs more focus IMO
Last edited by ALi-B; 22 October 2014 at 07:27 PM.
#25
Scooby Regular
This is such a non-story to me.
On one day with a bit of wind, they've finally done their job.....meanwhile during the times they weren't be it due to weather or nobody buying energy from them (as of course, with it being more expensive, energy retailers will only buy it if they are forced to by green levys), all the other not-so-green power stations have been chugging away day in day out meeting our needs.
Bar the one that caught fire. Even then it was blown out of proportion, it going off line was never an issue...and only four cooling of the thirty towers were damaged.
I'm not against renewables, but I really think wind farms are not the answer. Solar, tidle, hydroelectric storage (pumped reservoirs)....and nuclear needs more focus IMO
On one day with a bit of wind, they've finally done their job.....meanwhile during the times they weren't be it due to weather or nobody buying energy from them (as of course, with it being more expensive, energy retailers will only buy it if they are forced to by green levys), all the other not-so-green power stations have been chugging away day in day out meeting our needs.
Bar the one that caught fire. Even then it was blown out of proportion, it going off line was never an issue...and only four cooling of the thirty towers were damaged.
I'm not against renewables, but I really think wind farms are not the answer. Solar, tidle, hydroelectric storage (pumped reservoirs)....and nuclear needs more focus IMO
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure I heard something along the lines of that the renewable companies were actually being paid to dump some of the energy they'd amassed (dunno how), cos if they introduced it all to the national grid it would overload it?
Dunno if it's true or not though.
Dunno if it's true or not though.
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well in enough detail to demonstrate you understand the context that the production of energy exist in
some regard to "green" issues - however you choose to interpret that -- CO2 targets!! possibly
I have no fixed view btw - I suspect the info (pro or con a particular technology) I get is tainted by some agenda or another
it is difficult to make an informed decision
I do think the wind power milestone in the OP is a good news - whatever negative spin the rabid anti-green lobby may try and put on it
some regard to "green" issues - however you choose to interpret that -- CO2 targets!! possibly
I have no fixed view btw - I suspect the info (pro or con a particular technology) I get is tainted by some agenda or another
it is difficult to make an informed decision
I do think the wind power milestone in the OP is a good news - whatever negative spin the rabid anti-green lobby may try and put on it
My personal feeling however is that wind and solar have been over subsidised given the current technology. They really require a suitable energy storage scheme to be in place before they reach there true potential as green energy sources.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was told the UK is sitting on a whole raft of coal.Easily enough for +200 years.
Just need a bit of imagination to make good use of it.
Just need a bit of imagination to make good use of it.
#29
Scooby Regular
To be honest to do the discussion justice requires far more time and space than we have available here (having written a fairly lengthy paper on the subject at Uni).
My personal feeling however is that wind and solar have been over subsidised given the current technology. They really require a suitable energy storage scheme to be in place before they reach there true potential as green energy sources.
My personal feeling however is that wind and solar have been over subsidised given the current technology. They really require a suitable energy storage scheme to be in place before they reach there true potential as green energy sources.
but again nuclear is massively subsidised - it is just easier to hide at the backend
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 22 October 2014 at 08:29 PM.
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which would be wonderful if it was the answer but ultimately it isn't. Coal/gas/oil are finite resources and we should really be looking for a better alternative.