sudentassu
05 November 2003, 23:20
For the bright sparks on here I am proposing the adoption of "Sudentassu's Law of the RAC Rally".
It goes something like this:
x = ticket price
y = quality of service received by the enthusiasts
Taking a historical perspective, it would appear that as x increases in value, y has an inverse reaction, and decreases.
Whilst easy to quantify the shift in x, the shift in y appears to be semi-intangible. It is know that it reduces, but the ratio of relationship with x is unknown.
So why is it, that the more you pay, the more problems you hear about?
eg. no tickets, too many programmes, too few programmes, wrong passes, etc, etc
or is it merely a function of z, ie employing planks?
It goes something like this:
x = ticket price
y = quality of service received by the enthusiasts
Taking a historical perspective, it would appear that as x increases in value, y has an inverse reaction, and decreases.
Whilst easy to quantify the shift in x, the shift in y appears to be semi-intangible. It is know that it reduces, but the ratio of relationship with x is unknown.
So why is it, that the more you pay, the more problems you hear about?
eg. no tickets, too many programmes, too few programmes, wrong passes, etc, etc
or is it merely a function of z, ie employing planks?