Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2008-2010 2.5ltr Engine Failures

Old 16 August 2016, 09:44 PM
  #1801  
Imotepify
Scooby Regular
 
Imotepify's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: suffolk
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info fella
Old 23 August 2016, 11:49 PM
  #1802  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

W
Originally Posted by salsa-king
If a 2litre you'll be ok and cheaper road tax too.
Foggy SG STI is an EJ255. The SF is 2.0l and the Auto's are poor, the manuals are rare but the advert for the auto SF is a laughable price.
Old 25 August 2016, 09:09 PM
  #1803  
MrBlobby
Scooby Regular
 
MrBlobby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Without looking through the whole thread are there any reports on the reliability of the newer 2.5 sti''s from the last 2/3 years?...are mappers still hesitant to run higher boost/more power through the stock units compared to the old 2.0 sti lumps. Was just wondering if Subaru address the problems or not as it's obvious it's a great motor when built right. Just curious.
Old 29 August 2016, 10:58 PM
  #1804  
seaking22b
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
seaking22b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bury St Edmunds
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imotepify
2 hrs drive 2 get it running on our fuel is fine, how would it run on BP ultimate without a remap? I don't drive 2 hard and haven't bounced a car on the rev limiter for a long while lol
Duncan regularly maps at APT near Norwich too, done mine a few times after I've done bits
Old 02 September 2016, 12:01 PM
  #1805  
madfiddler
Scooby Regular
 
madfiddler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by salsa-king
Could be worth a phone call to Simon at APi to get some more info on what had gone on the car etc


what the max you want to spend?


You know road tax is £500 a year
Originally Posted by Imotepify
Originally Posted by fatboy_coach
I think that's a good price if you can land it for 11-12K. I was talking about 12K for my 08 which has covered more miles and is forged to a similar standard
Looks like it was bought to be resold. Now on Autotrader for £14k!!
Old 24 September 2016, 09:32 AM
  #1806  
peter a
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
peter a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Too long a thread to read the whole thing but does the 2007 Hawkeye 2.5 WRX suffer the same issues as the STI?
Old 24 September 2016, 09:55 AM
  #1807  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Great effort! This thread contains all the info you need.

In short. Yes.
Old 10 October 2016, 10:07 PM
  #1808  
topshot
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
topshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 967
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Without reading this thread at all I was under the impression the Hawkeye 2.5 WRX was a lot less likely to give up due to ringlands/HG than the hatch WRX/STI models?
Old 11 October 2016, 10:26 AM
  #1809  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Correct.
Old 12 October 2016, 01:58 PM
  #1810  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

But they still do suffer the same problems. All newage 2.5 engines from 55 reg upwards have these issues. No 2.5 engine is safe, some are worse than others.
Old 12 October 2016, 03:13 PM
  #1811  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

People with 70K+ 2.5 mileages would disagree with you.
Old 12 October 2016, 03:46 PM
  #1812  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Higher mileage engines don't mean they are immune to the potential issues, it just means the problems haven't presented themselves yet. The design & build faults are still present and the potential is very much there for failure on any of the 2.5 engines.
Old 12 October 2016, 03:52 PM
  #1813  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Never said it did, but you always make out they every single 2.5 is going to fail at some point, which is definitely not the case or true, especially with standard engines running with a decent map. After 2008-2010

Last edited by bioforger; 12 October 2016 at 03:53 PM.
Old 12 October 2016, 04:06 PM
  #1814  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I don't always make out that every single 2.5 is going to fail and as a multiple 2.5 owner I have always loved the 2.5 engines. I would have them time and time again, but will always be cautious of the potential 2.5 issues rather than being blinkered by them.


My 06 WRX 2.5 (that I owned since it was a year old) was amazing and massively over-serviced by me throughout it's life by only the best engineers. I always drove it with a massive amount of mechanical sympathy as I always do my cars. When I sold it back to Subaru at 75k miles this year, it too demonstrated the early signs of head gasket failure. Thankfully my dealership were also well aware of the issues and prepared to look into it and sort it out.


No matter how careful you are there is still a chance of failure. I'm not saying every engine will fail, because they won't. But the potential is there without a doubt.


That said, I'm still driving a 2.5 and I still love them just as much!
Old 12 October 2016, 04:11 PM
  #1815  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by bioforger
Never said it did, but you always make out they every single 2.5 is going to fail at some point, which is definitely not the case or true, especially with standard engines running with a decent map. After 2008-2010
Even after 2010 the map wasn't great and the inherent issues built into the engine are still there which are potential failures waiting to happen.
The 2.5 was a step too far in reality, they all have a tendency to crack across cylinders, the oil pick up pipe and head gaskets are also worth mentioning, and its on both the EJ257 AND EJ255.

Of course it doesn't mean they will all fail, but it does mean the failure rate will probably be considerably higher than expected of this type of engine.
Old 12 October 2016, 04:23 PM
  #1816  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yea well any engine has the potential to fail at some point Most manufacturers have issues of some sort or another.

Blinkered not at all, but if you take everything written on the net to heart, you would never drive a post 2006 subaru ever again. This site especially is prone to blowing (no pun intended) the problems way out of proportion.

Yup 2006, i'm not surprised, i think subaru definitely cleared up some of the manufacturing issues, especially for the HG bolt problems though after 2010, i guess it depends on who you speak to about that and what you are willing to believe.

To put it into perspective every single car i've owned has either blown its HG or warped the head or worse. But none of the Subarus i've owned (including an '06 sti briefly) ever have... must be good luck
Old 12 October 2016, 04:24 PM
  #1817  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Even after 2010 the map wasn't great and the inherent issues built into the engine are still there which are potential failures waiting to happen.
The 2.5 was a step too far in reality, they all have a tendency to crack across cylinders, the oil pick up pipe and head gaskets are also worth mentioning, and its on both the EJ257 AND EJ255.

Of course it doesn't mean they will all fail, but it does mean the failure rate will probably be considerably higher than expected of this type of engine.
yep ok but i meant a non subaru map.
Old 12 October 2016, 04:34 PM
  #1818  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bioforger
Yea well any engine has the potential to fail at some point Most manufacturers have issues of some sort or another.

Blinkered not at all, but if you take everything written on the net to heart, you would never drive a post 2006 subaru ever again. This site especially is prone to blowing (no pun intended) the problems way out of proportion.

Yup 2006, i'm not surprised, i think subaru definitely cleared up some of the manufacturing issues, especially for the HG bolt problems though after 2010, i guess it depends on who you speak to about that and what you are willing to believe.

To put it into perspective every single car i've owned has either blown its HG or warped the head or worse. But none of the Subarus i've owned (including an '06 sti briefly) ever have... must be good luck
I couldn't agree more. Every single supplier has weaknesses in their designs and engines without fail. If you listened to everything and took everything to heart you wouldn't drive anything at all for fear of failure.


I've owned 2.5 Subaru's, rotary RX8's high powered rotary RX7's, SR20DET Pulsar GTI-R's which are supposedly prone to bottom end failure and many more on the "worry list". It always makes me laugh and it's never put me off buying or driving any of these cars daily. Realistically the Subaru 2.5 problems may put off a few people as it's very well documented now, but most will just grit their teeth and buy one anyhow hoping it doesn't fail like I do!


If it fails, rebuild it stronger, better and faster!
Old 12 October 2016, 04:40 PM
  #1819  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

absolutely and if it does fail for me then i can fallback on my 3rd party 5yr warranty. Although that isn't worth the paper its printed on either if you believe the forums
Old 22 October 2016, 11:21 PM
  #1820  
Matty Door
Scooby Newbie
 
Matty Door's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: darlington
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I'm so glad I've decided to look on here again
Had a 2005 wrx and loved it
Now been looking at a 2015 wrx sti

But this engine problem seems a big put off
Old 23 October 2016, 08:23 AM
  #1821  
salsa-king
Scooby Senior
 
salsa-king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nottm
Posts: 15,067
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matty Door
Well I'm so glad I've decided to look on here again
Had a 2005 wrx and loved it
Now been looking at a 2015 wrx sti

But this engine problem seems a big put off

I didn't think there was a problem with the 2015-on cars
Old 23 October 2016, 09:20 AM
  #1822  
MOTORS S GT
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
MOTORS S GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by salsa-king
I didn't think there was a problem with the 2015-on cars
I have an engine here now from a 7800 mile 2015 STI with ringland failure on cylinders 2 & 4, car is not mapped & is OE std, also know of a late 2015 car that suffered bearing failure & the car was rejected by the owner & Subaru bought it back.
Old 24 October 2016, 06:58 AM
  #1823  
salsa-king
Scooby Senior
 
salsa-king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nottm
Posts: 15,067
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

will that be fix on a Warranty claim with Subaru?
Old 24 October 2016, 08:42 AM
  #1824  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Personally I think It's disgraceful that Subaru haven't addressed the issues and continue to build engines with the same known faults.


That said, It's keeping Paul employed!
Old 24 October 2016, 09:27 AM
  #1825  
Matty81
Scooby Regular
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Banned
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

like any engine, if you push it far beyond its boundaries its gonna go wrong. ive got a 2.5 and on 70,000, touch wood no problems so far.
Old 24 October 2016, 09:30 AM
  #1826  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

The problem is that some of these fail without having to be pushed due to manufacturing defects from Subaru they fail to acknowledge & rectify.
Old 24 October 2016, 10:29 AM
  #1827  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yea but the bearing failure one must have been due to a feckup in the factory build. You could argue the same for the one he mentioned that failed at 8K, also you don't know how it was treated by the owner. Too many variables. On the other hand it could have failed due to a defect as you mention, but you don't know.
Old 24 October 2016, 11:24 AM
  #1828  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bioforger
Yea but the bearing failure one must have been due to a feckup in the factory build. You could argue the same for the one he mentioned that failed at 8K, also you don't know how it was treated by the owner. Too many variables. On the other hand it could have failed due to a defect as you mention, but you don't know.

Not really. You can't say that ringland failure is due to a factory build issue. It's a weakness in the piston structure and design that causes that particular failure which is very often promoted by a poor Subaru map.
Old 24 October 2016, 12:10 PM
  #1829  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yea sure you can, if the tolerances with the rings were off when the engine was built it could cause it. You just don't know.
Old 24 October 2016, 12:17 PM
  #1830  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2008-2010 2.5ltr Engine Failures



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.