2008-2010 2.5ltr Engine Failures
#1621
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
David (or anyone else who builds these things for a living), one thing I struggle to understand is that the pistons in the 2.5 are made of the same material as those in the 2.0 cars post-2003.
I've got a friend who absolutely spanked the **** off one of these engines for several years, tracked it and all sorts - and it was pushing out over 450bhp.
I've also seen and heard of so many of these 2.0 cars "in the wrong hands" with decats and cone air filters, ones thrashed from cold and run on 95 RON - you name it. They keep going.
I don't worry too much about mine as it was built by Cosworth and would expect it to be okay for that, time will tell. But it all seems a bit unnecessary to throw so many expensive and supposedly high-tolerance bits at an engine to achieve 400/400 when a remap and turbo is sometimes enough on the older cars, albeit very "reliably" too.
I understand that with the 2.5s the head gaskets might not be up to the job or bolted down hard enough and that the map may cause issues with det or whatever, but surely there is something else responsible for the pistons breaking?
What I'm basically asking is, do you think that solving the problem could be as simple as changing the way the engine is assembled without altering any internals? Or is there some fundamental issue with the shape or structure of the engine that requires new bits?
I've got a friend who absolutely spanked the **** off one of these engines for several years, tracked it and all sorts - and it was pushing out over 450bhp.
I've also seen and heard of so many of these 2.0 cars "in the wrong hands" with decats and cone air filters, ones thrashed from cold and run on 95 RON - you name it. They keep going.
I don't worry too much about mine as it was built by Cosworth and would expect it to be okay for that, time will tell. But it all seems a bit unnecessary to throw so many expensive and supposedly high-tolerance bits at an engine to achieve 400/400 when a remap and turbo is sometimes enough on the older cars, albeit very "reliably" too.
I understand that with the 2.5s the head gaskets might not be up to the job or bolted down hard enough and that the map may cause issues with det or whatever, but surely there is something else responsible for the pistons breaking?
What I'm basically asking is, do you think that solving the problem could be as simple as changing the way the engine is assembled without altering any internals? Or is there some fundamental issue with the shape or structure of the engine that requires new bits?
That is a very simplified explanation.
There is no different way to build the engine when substandard components are being used.
I have always said that you can build a Subaru engine with NASA moonrocket quality parts - but detonation, excessive in cylinder temps, or high oil temperature will ruin it no matter what.
Taken as a problem on a worldwide scale, the numbers of failures seem high to us, but are in fact, globally, the failures are not enough to justify Subaru putting better pistons in ALL engines sold worldwide, it changes their cost equation too much. In my opinion.
David
#1622
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Guisborough
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
, BMW and VW ranked in the bottom 10 of a study into engine reliability
German-made cars are not as reliable as many believe, according to new research. Warranty Direct has studied its claims data to compile a list of the manufacturers with the most reliable engines - and*Audi,*BMW*and*Volkswagen*all finished in the bottom 10 out of a total 36 makers.In fact, the only firm whose cars had a worse engine failure rate than Audi was MG Rover.*MINI*wasn’t much better, finishing third from bottom, while its parent company BMW came seventh from bottom. And, despite its reputation for rock-solid reliability,*Volkswagen*came ninth from bottom.Honda*scooped the gold medal – the study found that just one in every 344 Honda engines failed, compared to one in every 27 Audi engines. Despite its recent recall woes,*Toyota*came second and*Mercedes*managed to outperform its fellow German brands with a respectable third-place finish.Duncan McClure, Warranty Direct Managing Director, said that engine failures are the worst for motorists as they’re the repairs that can lead to the highest costs because of the parts and hours of labour required to fix them: “The nuber of failures may be low compared to areas such as axle and suspension damage but engine repairs almost always result in costs reaching the thousands for motorists who aren’t covered by a warranty.”An engine failure on a*Range Rover*Vogue recently led to Warranty Direct’s highest ever claim of £13,000.
In 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed in United States District Court in New Jersey against Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-AMG for alleged defects in the M156 engine contained in AMG vehicles built in 2007-2011 model years leading to premature wear. The plaintiff claimed the combination of cast nodular iron camshafts and 9310 grade steel valve lifters contributed to the premature wear, but the defendants had known about the defect since 2007.[2]
http://www.pswlaw.com/Notable-Cases/...ss-Action.aspx
Honda being the most reliable engine manufacturer has 1 in 344 engine failures.
German-made cars are not as reliable as many believe, according to new research. Warranty Direct has studied its claims data to compile a list of the manufacturers with the most reliable engines - and*Audi,*BMW*and*Volkswagen*all finished in the bottom 10 out of a total 36 makers.In fact, the only firm whose cars had a worse engine failure rate than Audi was MG Rover.*MINI*wasn’t much better, finishing third from bottom, while its parent company BMW came seventh from bottom. And, despite its reputation for rock-solid reliability,*Volkswagen*came ninth from bottom.Honda*scooped the gold medal – the study found that just one in every 344 Honda engines failed, compared to one in every 27 Audi engines. Despite its recent recall woes,*Toyota*came second and*Mercedes*managed to outperform its fellow German brands with a respectable third-place finish.Duncan McClure, Warranty Direct Managing Director, said that engine failures are the worst for motorists as they’re the repairs that can lead to the highest costs because of the parts and hours of labour required to fix them: “The nuber of failures may be low compared to areas such as axle and suspension damage but engine repairs almost always result in costs reaching the thousands for motorists who aren’t covered by a warranty.”An engine failure on a*Range Rover*Vogue recently led to Warranty Direct’s highest ever claim of £13,000.
In 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed in United States District Court in New Jersey against Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-AMG for alleged defects in the M156 engine contained in AMG vehicles built in 2007-2011 model years leading to premature wear. The plaintiff claimed the combination of cast nodular iron camshafts and 9310 grade steel valve lifters contributed to the premature wear, but the defendants had known about the defect since 2007.[2]
http://www.pswlaw.com/Notable-Cases/...ss-Action.aspx
Honda being the most reliable engine manufacturer has 1 in 344 engine failures.
#1623
Scooby Regular
Essentially the piston material is not strong enough to resist the explosion of the fuel air mix and it sets up a rattle/vibration that shakes the piston to bits harmonically. More so if the timing or A'f ratio is a bit off. Rather like an opera singer hitting a high note and breaking a wine glass.
That is a very simplified explanation.
There is no different way to build the engine when substandard components are being used.
I have always said that you can build a Subaru engine with NASA moonrocket quality parts - but detonation, excessive in cylinder temps, or high oil temperature will ruin it no matter what.
Taken as a problem on a worldwide scale, the numbers of failures seem high to us, but are in fact, globally, the failures are not enough to justify Subaru putting better pistons in ALL engines sold worldwide, it changes their cost equation too much. In my opinion.
David
That is a very simplified explanation.
There is no different way to build the engine when substandard components are being used.
I have always said that you can build a Subaru engine with NASA moonrocket quality parts - but detonation, excessive in cylinder temps, or high oil temperature will ruin it no matter what.
Taken as a problem on a worldwide scale, the numbers of failures seem high to us, but are in fact, globally, the failures are not enough to justify Subaru putting better pistons in ALL engines sold worldwide, it changes their cost equation too much. In my opinion.
David
I find it quite amazing the hypereutectic pistons in the 2.5 aren't up to the job, but the same hypereutectic ones are in the 2.0 are (or at least more so, up to regular power outputs or higher).
So it would appear the material is not up to the job because the stresses (e.g. explosions caused by injection of fuel and air into the cylinder) in the 2.5 are different in some way to the 2.0?
After what I saw on the evening news I'm not entirely sure an engine built from spaceship parts would get very far at all
#1624
The 2.0 pistons are narrower than the 2.5 ones, but same design so the forces on the piston are higher, possibly just in certain points, or an imbalance, as API David suggested... so shake 'emselves to bits.
#1625
Scooby Regular
Someone best amend the thread title.... reports from the US of 2015 STI failures due to bearings on No.3 rod failure. Could very well be isolated, but at least three have been reported in the wild thus far.
#1626
Scooby Regular
To be honest this thread should include 2.5 Hawks too, my Spec D blew up.
#1627
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Naboomspruit, South Africa
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1630
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Guisborough
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1631
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Naboomspruit, South Africa
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1632
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Guisborough
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1635
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Holywell
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your reply David.
I find it quite amazing the hypereutectic pistons in the 2.5 aren't up to the job, but the same hypereutectic ones are in the 2.0 are (or at least more so, up to regular power outputs or higher).
So it would appear the material is not up to the job because the stresses (e.g. explosions caused by injection of fuel and air into the cylinder) in the 2.5 are different in some way to the 2.0?
After what I saw on the evening news I'm not entirely sure an engine built from spaceship parts would get very far at all
I find it quite amazing the hypereutectic pistons in the 2.5 aren't up to the job, but the same hypereutectic ones are in the 2.0 are (or at least more so, up to regular power outputs or higher).
So it would appear the material is not up to the job because the stresses (e.g. explosions caused by injection of fuel and air into the cylinder) in the 2.5 are different in some way to the 2.0?
After what I saw on the evening news I'm not entirely sure an engine built from spaceship parts would get very far at all
#1636
Scooby Senior
Just remember no one comes on this site & says had a drive around today and car was fine.
Also no one says my engine blew up today. Maybe it was that dodgy remap I had done / petrol I bought from the local garage that hasn't had a petrol delivery since 1957/cheap non spec oil I used/or I had been thrashing it round a track for 27 hours just before it blew up.
Also no one says my engine blew up today. Maybe it was that dodgy remap I had done / petrol I bought from the local garage that hasn't had a petrol delivery since 1957/cheap non spec oil I used/or I had been thrashing it round a track for 27 hours just before it blew up.
very true.
#1637
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just remember no one comes on this site & says had a drive around today and car was fine.
Also no one says my engine blew up today. Maybe it was that dodgy remap I had done / petrol I bought from the local garage that hasn't had a petrol delivery since 1957/cheap non spec oil I used/or I had been thrashing it round a track for 27 hours just before it blew up.
Also no one says my engine blew up today. Maybe it was that dodgy remap I had done / petrol I bought from the local garage that hasn't had a petrol delivery since 1957/cheap non spec oil I used/or I had been thrashing it round a track for 27 hours just before it blew up.
#1642
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Yep, Chocolate cranks in 57,08 & 58 plate diesels. They snap in half - [ more or less ] and then in the tangle break the cylinder block, so it is wrecked.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about £4 grand + VAT Plus £600.00 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to stretch when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about £4 grand + VAT Plus £600.00 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to stretch when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
Last edited by APIDavid; 06 November 2014 at 01:08 PM. Reason: Added info
#1643
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Guisborough
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, Chocolate cranks in 57,08 & 58 plate diesels. They snap in half - [ more or less ] and then in the tangle break the cylinder block, so it is wrecked.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about 4 grand + VAT Plus 600 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to strech when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about 4 grand + VAT Plus 600 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to strech when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
#1645
Scooby Regular
Yep, Chocolate cranks in 57,08 & 58 plate diesels. They snap in half - [ more or less ] and then in the tangle break the cylinder block, so it is wrecked.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about £4 grand + VAT Plus £600.00 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to stretch when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
A short motor from Subaru UK is about £4 grand + VAT Plus £600.00 + VAT for gaskets. We always fit chains too, as they are known to stretch when the engine tries to stop or start when all inside is mush.
Unlikely with labour to get away with a bill much less that £5000 + VAT to fix a diesel. We've done a number of them and I bought a couple that sounded cheap with busted engines that turned to be wrecked and even I could not fix them cheaply.
Don't let anyone, if you need an engine , tell you they are importing the engines from Japan. To my knowledge the diesel 2.0 turbo is not sold in Japan.
David
PS if you own one DO NOT miss aservice or delay servicing the car as IM will drop you like a ton of bricks if they can.
Also worth noting that the crank failures were down to assembly issues on the production line IIRC which is unlike the Impreza 2.5 problems which would appear be down to design issues IMO.
#1646
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
My 2.5 2011 with 19kmiles and 34months a full engine was more closer to £9+k and Subaru UK footed the bid thankfully
But as the remainder of 3 year warranty would only have been max 1 month I paid nearly £1K for forged Pistons to be fitted. Although Pistons weren't at fault
Tony
But as the remainder of 3 year warranty would only have been max 1 month I paid nearly £1K for forged Pistons to be fitted. Although Pistons weren't at fault
Tony
Last edited by T5NYW; 07 November 2014 at 12:49 AM.
#1647
Scooby Regular
My 2.5 2011 with 19kmiles and 34months a full engine was more closer to £9+k and Subaru UK footed the bid thankfully
But as the remainder of 3 year warranty would only have been max 1 month I paid nearly £1K for forged Pistons to be fitted. Although Pistons weren't at fault
Tony
But as the remainder of 3 year warranty would only have been max 1 month I paid nearly £1K for forged Pistons to be fitted. Although Pistons weren't at fault
Tony
Do you still have the car?
#1648
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
Yes a bit unlucky. The centre ring on one piston had be cracked a long time
Still got the car. I'll start to sell it soon though but can't get around to doing it.
It's done approximately 1,200 miles since rebuild and 400m since running in service. So happier to sell on as it's loosened up.
Tony
#1649
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your reply David.
I find it quite amazing the hypereutectic pistons in the 2.5 aren't up to the job, but the same hypereutectic ones are in the 2.0 are (or at least more so, up to regular power outputs or higher).
So it would appear the material is not up to the job because the stresses (e.g. explosions caused by injection of fuel and air into the cylinder) in the 2.5 are different in some way to the 2.0?
After what I saw on the evening news I'm not entirely sure an engine built from spaceship parts would get very far at all
I find it quite amazing the hypereutectic pistons in the 2.5 aren't up to the job, but the same hypereutectic ones are in the 2.0 are (or at least more so, up to regular power outputs or higher).
So it would appear the material is not up to the job because the stresses (e.g. explosions caused by injection of fuel and air into the cylinder) in the 2.5 are different in some way to the 2.0?
After what I saw on the evening news I'm not entirely sure an engine built from spaceship parts would get very far at all
Hypereutectic Pistons made for quite an interesting read. Shame Subaru ended up with such an unreliable set up from them though.
#1650
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Holywell
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I havn't done many 2.5WRX rebuilds at all, so I think the extra boost that the STI's run is just too much for the pistons.