Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Electric cars-generally..

Old 31 October 2016, 11:24 PM
  #31  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dblock
I disagree, maybe because I'm getting old but a while ago I used to commute about 1000miles a week in a Lupo tdi lol. Yeah it's terrible etc etc but it was comfortable and cheap to run. Currently I only do 300+miles a week. I'm not paid great but it's cool. The leaf and now van is free to charge up and drive, free road tax and insurance is reasonable.

Yes they aren't hardcore racecar but sometimes when I've finished work I'm tired and just want to get home. If I commuted in my Impreza I'd be broke and would have to sell it. Plus you can have a more "hardcore" weekend car and take it easy in your EV.
But that's about economics allowing you to then run a proper car

Don't get my wrong,if I could get an electric car for the boring hour and a half 10 mph journey to work for not a lot and spend money on a nice real car then I agree (save I'd worry about using the electric windows and everything else electric )then agreed

Just saying generally,they aren't like real 'cars'.Just IMHO
Old 31 October 2016, 11:27 PM
  #32  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Having 2 cars , to save money , lol
Old 01 November 2016, 07:50 PM
  #33  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Having 2 cars , to save money , lol
Not as dumb as it seems, in the long term. Less wear and tear on each car so should retain their value better and last longer, and if one of them is zero-rated for tax, the only real additional overhead is the extra insurance.
Old 02 November 2016, 11:00 AM
  #34  
boggissimo
Scooby Regular
 
boggissimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kent
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Not as dumb as it seems, in the long term. Less wear and tear on each car so should retain their value better and last longer, and if one of them is zero-rated for tax, the only real additional overhead is the extra insurance.
Agree completely. For the boring drives and short journeys, go electric. For fun and longer trips, take the Scoob.
Old 03 November 2016, 01:55 PM
  #35  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,032
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boggissimo
Agree completely. For the boring drives and short journeys, go electric. For fun and longer trips, take the Scoob.

I did that...bought a £200 MK2 Polo..did 15,000miles in 12month with it over two years and then replaced it with a N13 Sunny which I did the same over another year. Both averaged over 40mpg on the daily commute, and were cheap to tax (both below 1300cc ).

Meanwhile, what happened to the scoob?

It just sat there never being used. Really couldn't be arsed to drive it so was a waste of tax and insurance!

These days I say sod it to the running costs, and look towards drive something interesting on the daily commute, albeit with a sensible boot (hatch/estate)....then its something to enjoy on the way to/from work Afterall, if I can't afford it, I shouldn't have it anyway!

Last edited by ALi-B; 03 November 2016 at 01:59 PM.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.